Zahar Prilepin's blogs as the new modern literary creativity measurement
Povzetek
BLOGI ZAHARJA PRILEPINA KOT NOVO MERILO SODOBNE LITERARNE USTVARJALNOSTI
Modern technological development affects literature not only in the form of perception and reading books but also in the way writers create and publish their literary pieces of art. Prilepin, as a famous and popular contemporary writer with a confirmed position in the Russian literary environment, promotes his books and Russian literature using internet blogs. The author attempts to analyse his blogs and other internet resources in order to show Prilepin's involvement in creating e-literature. Contemporary blogs are explained in the context of the public literary sphere, which creates unique social opportunities in social communication. The activities of writers and literary critics who have a well-established position in the literary environment appear to have an undeniably significant impact on the revolution in Russian web literature that is represented by a new genre of literature, which is expressed in the wide distribution of literary works over the internet and the interactive communication of the author with readers and their direct influence on the author’s further creativity.
Prenosi
Literatura
Ekaterina BARKOVA, 2013: Taste tendencies evolution in 20th century everyday culture (fashion and dress). Bulletin of A. S. Pushkin Leningrad State University 3.
Peter BERGER, Thomas LUCKMANN, 2010: Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości. Traktat z socjologii wiedzy. Przeł. J. Niżnik. Warszawa: PWN.
Аnna BURZYNSKA, Michal MARKOWSKI, 2007: Teorie literatury XX wieku. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
Natalia CHERKASOVA, 2012: Linguoculturological characteristics of a blog as a genre. Internet communications. Chelyabinsk State University Bulletin 5/259, Philology, History of the Art 63, 164–169.
Anthony GIDDENS, 2003: Stanowienie społeczeństwa. Zarys teorii strukturyzacji. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.
Anna GUMKOWSKA, Maciej MARYL, 2009: Blog to blog. Blogi oczyma blogerów. Raport z badania jakościowego zrealizowanego przez. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN i Gazeta.pl. Tekst (w) sieci.
Andrew KEEN, 2007: Kult amatora. Jak internet niszczy kulturę. Warszawa. Tł. M. Bernatowicz, K. Topolska-Ghariani.
Olga KHUDYAKOVA, 2015: Language orientation showdown in the English-speaking blogosphere. Cognitive Linguistics Issues 3/44.
Maria KOCHETKOVA, Inna BATALOVA, 2014: Dynamics of blog progress as a genre of blogosphere discourse. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology 1/27, 39.
Niklas LUHMANN, 2009: Einführung in die Systemtheorie, Carl Auer Verlag, Heidelberg 2006. Cyt za: Głażewski M., Teoria systemów autopojetycznych Niklasa Luhmanna – między metafizyką a metabiologią. Przegląd Pedagogiczny 1, 39–55.
Dmitry MICHURIN, 2014: Precedent poly-code text in verbal communication of Internet communities (based on materials of Russian-speacking image forums). Tver: Tver State University. 162.
Andrzej OCHMAN, 2015: Zarys koncepcji Habermasowskiej sfery publicznej. Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego 35, 19–45.
Zahar PRILEPIN, 2018a: Prilepin. Livejournal. Accessed 06.01.2020: https://prilepin.livejournal.com/1080871.html.
– –, 2018b: I like to live on a wide foot! Litres. Accessed 06.01.2020: https://www.litres.ru/pages/cms/?page=10518.
Valeria PUSTOVAYA, 2011: Anthology of screenshots. October 12.
Byron REEVES, Clifford NASS, 2000: Media i ludzie. Tł. H. Szczerkowska. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
Andrey RUDALEV, 2018a: Zahar Prilepin (interview). Teacher’s newspaper 24. Accessed 06.01.2020: http://www.ug.ru/archive/74923.
– –, 2018b: Zahar Prilepin: Literature is wall to wall. Teacher’s newspaper. Accessed 06.01.2020: http://www.ug.ru/guest/529.
Roger SELL, 2000: Literature as Communication. The Foundations of Mediating Criticism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Elena SELYUTINA, Andey SELYUTIN, 2016: The culture of reading in modern communicative practices: online media and picture of the modern reader’s world. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University 13, 395.
Julia SISHCHUK, Irina GERASIMOVA, Maria GONCHAROVA, 2019: Anthropocentric world picture in german and english geological and mining metaphoric terms. InnovationBased Development of the Mineral Resources Sector: Challenges and Prospects - 11th conference of the Russian-German Raw Materials.
Maria STEBLYANKO, 2018: Zahar Prilepin: I like to live on a wide foot!. Vladnews. Accessed 06.01.2020: https://vladnews.ru/2018-06-13/132735/zahar_prilepin.
Andrey SUVOROV, 2016: Blogosphere as literary space: Yevgeni Grishkovetz’s "digital" reader. Philology, Journalism 16/2.
Piotr SZTOMPKA, 1999: Trust. A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tatyana TILININA, 2012: Reasons of value system crisis in modern Russian families. Theory and practice of social development 6. Accessed 06.01.2020: http://teoria-practica.ru/rus/files/arhiv_zhurnala/2012/6/sоciоlоgiyа/tilinina.pdf.
Marina ZAGIDULINA, 2017: Literary’s criticism of the mental and institutional transformations of the literary workshop: the historical context of the thesis "we don’t have a literature".
Międzynarodowe seminarium naukowe “Czasopisma literackie w aspekcie teoretycznym i historyczno-kulturowym”. Polska, Sosnowiec: Uniwersytet Śląski.
Anna ZALIZNYAK, 2010: A Diary: definition of the genre. The new literary review, 106.
Copyright (c) 2020 Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Avtorske pravice
Avtorji sprejetih prispevkov ohranijo avtorske pravice svojega besedila, obenem pa uredništvu revije Slavia Centralis priznavajo pravico do elektronske distribucije prispevka. Avtorji lahko svoje besedilo (v natisnjeni ali elektronski verziji) ponovno objavijo zgolj ob navedbi prvotne objave v reviji Slavia Centralis. Avtorji lahko objavljeno besedilo dodajo tudi na osebno spletno stran, oddelčno spletno stran ali na institucionalne repozitorije.
Plagiatorstvo
Slavia Centralis je nekomercialna in prosto dostopna mednarodna znanstvena revija. Kot taka je zavezana etičnim načelom glede zaupnosti, izvirnosti in intelektualne poštenosti. Kršenje avtorskih pravic in plagiatorstvo obravnava zelo resno, zaradi česar z ustrezno programsko opremo preverja morebitno podobnost z vsebino drugih besedil.
Avtorji morajo upoštevati naslednje:
Predloženo besedilo mora biti izviren znanstveni članek. Vsi viri morajo biti korektno navedeni. Besedilo ne sme biti istočasno predloženo uredniški presoji drugih publikacij.
Za vključeno gradivo (citati, ilustracije, tabele ipd.) je treba pridobiti ustrezna dovoljenja, ki izhajajo iz avtorskih pravic.
Objava v reviji Slavia Centralia ne predvideva plačila.