Zahar Prilepin's blogs as the new modern literary creativity measurement

  • Monika Karwacka University of Silesia, Philological Faculty
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18690/scn.13.1.232–243.2020
Keywords: Prilepin’s blogs, modern Russian literature, literary criticism, e-literature, public literary sphere, war experience

Abstract

Sodobni tehnološki razvoj vpliva na literaturo, ne le na dojemanje in branje knjig, ampak tudi na način, kako pisatelji ustvarjajo in objavljajo svoje literarne umetnine. Prilepin kot znan in priljubljen sodobni pisatelj, ki ima v ruskem literarnem okolju uveljavljen položaj, svoje knjige in rusko literaturo promovira s pomočjo blogov. Avtorica članka Prilepinove bloge in druge internetne vire analizira z namenom prikazati njegovo sodelovanje pri ustvarjanju e-literature. Sodobni blogi so razloženi v kontekstu javne literarne sfere, ki v socialni komunikaciji ustvarja edinstvene družbene priložnosti. Dejavnosti pisateljev in literarnih kritikov, ki imajo v literarnem okolju uveljavljen položaj, nedvomno pomembno vplivajo na revolucijo v ruski spletni literaturi, ki jo predstavlja novi literarni žanr. Ta se izraža v široki spletni distribuciji literarnih del in interaktivni komunikaciji avtorja z bralci ter njihovega neposrednega vpliva na avtorjevo nadaljnjo ustvarjalnost.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Monika Karwacka, University of Silesia, Philological Faculty

Katowice, Poland. E-pošta: karwacka.m@rambler.ru

References

Sara AKRAM, 2017: Blog – gatunek w formie kolekcji czy kolekcja gatunków. Acta Humana 8, 60–72.
Ekaterina BARKOVA, 2013: Taste tendencies evolution in 20th century everyday culture (fashion and dress). Bulletin of A. S. Pushkin Leningrad State University 3.
Peter BERGER, Thomas LUCKMANN, 2010: Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości. Traktat z socjologii wiedzy. Przeł. J. Niżnik. Warszawa: PWN.
Аnna BURZYNSKA, Michal MARKOWSKI, 2007: Teorie literatury XX wieku. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
Natalia CHERKASOVA, 2012: Linguoculturological characteristics of a blog as a genre. Internet communications. Chelyabinsk State University Bulletin 5/259, Philology, History of the Art 63, 164–169.
Anthony GIDDENS, 2003: Stanowienie społeczeństwa. Zarys teorii strukturyzacji. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.
Anna GUMKOWSKA, Maciej MARYL, 2009: Blog to blog. Blogi oczyma blogerów. Raport z badania jakościowego zrealizowanego przez. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN i Gazeta.pl. Tekst (w) sieci.
Andrew KEEN, 2007: Kult amatora. Jak internet niszczy kulturę. Warszawa. Tł. M. Bernatowicz, K. Topolska-Ghariani.
Olga KHUDYAKOVA, 2015: Language orientation showdown in the English-speaking blogosphere. Cognitive Linguistics Issues 3/44.
Maria KOCHETKOVA, Inna BATALOVA, 2014: Dynamics of blog progress as a genre of blogosphere discourse. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology 1/27, 39.
Niklas LUHMANN, 2009: Einführung in die Systemtheorie, Carl Auer Verlag, Heidelberg 2006. Cyt za: Głażewski M., Teoria systemów autopojetycznych Niklasa Luhmanna – między metafizyką a metabiologią. Przegląd Pedagogiczny 1, 39–55.
Dmitry MICHURIN, 2014: Precedent poly-code text in verbal communication of Internet communities (based on materials of Russian-speacking image forums). Tver: Tver State University. 162.
Andrzej OCHMAN, 2015: Zarys koncepcji Habermasowskiej sfery publicznej. Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego 35, 19–45.
Zahar PRILEPIN, 2018a: Prilepin. Livejournal. Accessed 06.01.2020: https://prilepin.livejournal.com/1080871.html.
– –, 2018b: I like to live on a wide foot! Litres. Accessed 06.01.2020: https://www.litres.ru/pages/cms/?page=10518.
Valeria PUSTOVAYA, 2011: Anthology of screenshots. October 12.
Byron REEVES, Clifford NASS, 2000: Media i ludzie. Tł. H. Szczerkowska. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
Andrey RUDALEV, 2018a: Zahar Prilepin (interview). Teacher’s newspaper 24. Accessed 06.01.2020: http://www.ug.ru/archive/74923.
– –, 2018b: Zahar Prilepin: Literature is wall to wall. Teacher’s newspaper. Accessed 06.01.2020: http://www.ug.ru/guest/529.
Roger SELL, 2000: Literature as Communication. The Foundations of Mediating Criticism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Elena SELYUTINA, Andey SELYUTIN, 2016: The culture of reading in modern communicative practices: online media and picture of the modern reader’s world. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University 13, 395.
Julia SISHCHUK, Irina GERASIMOVA, Maria GONCHAROVA, 2019: Anthropocentric world picture in german and english geological and mining metaphoric terms. InnovationBased Development of the Mineral Resources Sector: Challenges and Prospects - 11th conference of the Russian-German Raw Materials.
Maria STEBLYANKO, 2018: Zahar Prilepin: I like to live on a wide foot!. Vladnews. Accessed 06.01.2020: https://vladnews.ru/2018-06-13/132735/zahar_prilepin.
Andrey SUVOROV, 2016: Blogosphere as literary space: Yevgeni Grishkovetz’s "digital" reader. Philology, Journalism 16/2.
Piotr SZTOMPKA, 1999: Trust. A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tatyana TILININA, 2012: Reasons of value system crisis in modern Russian families. Theory and practice of social development 6. Accessed 06.01.2020: http://teoria-practica.ru/rus/files/arhiv_zhurnala/2012/6/sоciоlоgiyа/tilinina.pdf.
Marina ZAGIDULINA, 2017: Literary’s criticism of the mental and institutional transformations of the literary workshop: the historical context of the thesis "we don’t have a literature".
Międzynarodowe seminarium naukowe “Czasopisma literackie w aspekcie teoretycznym i historyczno-kulturowym”. Polska, Sosnowiec: Uniwersytet Śląski.
Anna ZALIZNYAK, 2010: A Diary: definition of the genre. The new literary review, 106.
Published
2020-10-17
How to Cite
Karwacka M. (2020). Zahar Prilepin’s blogs as the new modern literary creativity measurement. Slavia Centralis, 13(1), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.18690/scn.13.1.232–243.2020
Issue
Vol 13 No 1 (2020)
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2020 University of Maribor Press

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyrights

Authors of accepted manuscripts will retain copyright in their work, but will assign to Slavia Centralis the permanent right to electronically distribute their article. Authors may republish their work (in print and/or electronic format) as long as they acknowledge Slavia Centralis as the original publisher. Authors may also share the published version on their own websites, departmental webpages, or institutional repositories.

Plagiarism Policy

Slavia Centralis is a non-commercial, open access, electronic research journal. As such it pledges to uphold certain ethical principles regarding confidentiality, originality and intellectual fair play. Slavia Centralis takes copyright infringement and plagiarism very seriously and all submissions may be checked with duplication detection software.

Authors must:

  • Ensure that all work submitted is original, fully referenced and that all authors are represented accurately. The submission must be exclusive and not under consideration elsewhere.
  • Obtain all permissions from copyright owners for 3rd party material (e.g. quotations, illustrations, tables, etc.).
There are no fees associated with publishing in the journal.