Protestantizem in deliberacija
Abstract
Protestantism and Deliberation
Deliberation as critical, open, inclusive and argument-based discussion about matters of public interest is a crucial mechanism of a healthy democracy. According to deliberative democracy defenders, like Jürgen Habermas, deliberation contributes to achieving a better and more just society. The present essay analyses the intertwinement between the development of this political value in the Euro-Atlantic world on the one hand, and Protestantism and its development on the other. Recent works in the history of Protestantism and the political history of democracy paint a complex, but powerful picture: despite the religious conservative tendencies in Protestantism, it seems that a notable measure of freedom of research, belief and debate could be found in the societies where Protestantism had become a dominant religious culture. While this development is partly a result of contingent historic
events, it also had much to do with internal theological impulses within the Protestant thought.
Downloads
References
– –, 1996b: Exile and Tolerance. Tolerance and Intolerance in the European Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 165–181.
Jürgen HABERMAS, 1997: Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Scott HENDRIX, 2017: Martin Luther: Visionary Reformer. London: Yale University Press.
James KLOPPENBERG, 2016: Toward Democracy: The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
Michael LEGASPI, 2010: The Death of Scripture and the Rise of Biblical Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Andrew R. MURPHY, 2018: William Penn: A Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
William PENN, 2008: Concessions to the Province of Pennsylvania, July 11, 1681. Dostopno 13. 5. 2018 na spletni strani Lilian Goldman Law Library: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/pa02.asp.
– –, 2016: Charter of the Liberties and Frame of Government of Pennsylvania. Dostopno 13. 5. 2018 na spletni strani Library of Liberty: http://oll.libertyfund.org/pages/1682-charter-of-the-liberties-and-frame-of-government-of-pennsylvania.
Alec RYRIE, 2017: Protestants: The Radicals that Made the Modern World. London: William Collins.
Jeffrey STOUT, 1990: Ethics After Babel. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co.
– –, 2004: Democracy and Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Baruch de SPINOZA, Jan BEDNARIK, 1999: Teološko-politična razprava. Phainomena 9/27–28, 151–178.
Henry David THOREAU, 1994: Slavery in Massachusetts (1854). Dostopno 13. 5. 2018 na spletni strani Centra za afriške študije univerze v Pennsylvaniji: http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Slavery_Massachusetts.html.
Jeremy WALDRON, 2002: God, Locke and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2019 University of Maribor Press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyrights
Authors of accepted manuscripts will retain copyright in their work, but will assign to Slavia Centralis the permanent right to electronically distribute their article. Authors may republish their work (in print and/or electronic format) as long as they acknowledge Slavia Centralis as the original publisher. Authors may also share the published version on their own websites, departmental webpages, or institutional repositories.
Plagiarism Policy
Slavia Centralis is a non-commercial, open access, electronic research journal. As such it pledges to uphold certain ethical principles regarding confidentiality, originality and intellectual fair play. Slavia Centralis takes copyright infringement and plagiarism very seriously and all submissions may be checked with duplication detection software.
Authors must:
- Ensure that all work submitted is original, fully referenced and that all authors are represented accurately. The submission must be exclusive and not under consideration elsewhere.
- Obtain all permissions from copyright owners for 3rd party material (e.g. quotations, illustrations, tables, etc.).