Zmote o usvajanju funkcionalne pismenosti v e-okolju in nove naloge didaktike slovenščine
Abstract
MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT FUNCTIONAL LITERACY ACQUISITION IN E-ENVIRONMENTS AND THE NEW TASKS OF SLOVENIAN LANGUAGE DIDACTICS
Over the past decade, reflections on mother tongue curricula in 21st century schools have often stemmed from certain misconceptions about Generation Z. Digital natives, as members of Gen Z are often called, supposedly do not need linear reading skills anymore; the keyboard is supposedly replacing the pen entirely, and, most dangerously, the children of today are supposed to develop their functional literacy in e-environments automatically, which is why they do not require to be taught this at school. Relevant theoretical findings and empirical
research, however, show that all these three beliefs are erroneous and that they should not influence the design of new mother tongue curricula.
Downloads
References
Richard ANDERSON, 1994: Role of readers’ schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. Theoretical models and processes of reading. Ur. Robert Ruddell, Martha Rapp Ruddell, Harry Singer. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Elizabeth BAKER, 2010: The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
Paco CALVO, Antoni GOMILA, 2012: Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Julie COIRO, Elizabeth DOBLER, 2007: Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Rading Research Quartery 42/2, 214–257.
Julie COIRO, 2011: Predicting reading comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research 43/4, 352–392.
Pablo DELAGADO, Christina VARGAS, Rakefet ACKERMAN, Ladislao SALMERON, 2018: Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review 25, 23–38.
Evolution of Reading in Age of Digitisation (ERead). Dostop 23. 9. 2020 na http://ereadcost.eu/stavanger-declaration/.
Leonardo FOGASSI, Vittorio GALESSE, 2004: Action as a binding key to multisensory integration. The handbook of multisensory process. Ur. Gemma A. Calvert, Charles Spence, Barry E. Stein. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Margaret GALLEGO, Sandra HOLLINGSWORTH, 1992: Multiple literacies: Teachers’ evolving perceptions. Language Arts 69/3, 206–213.
Raymond W. GIBBS, 2005: Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Susan GOLDIN-MEADOW, 2003: Hearing gesture: how our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Daniel KAHNEMAN D, 2011: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar: Straus and Giroux.
Kyra KAMILOFF, Anette KAMILOFF-SMITH, 2001: Pathways to language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Markus KIEFER, Natalie M. TRUMPP, 2012: Embodiment theory and education: The foundations of cognition in perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience in Education 1/1, 15–20.
Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Kosta DOLENC, Andrej FLOGIE, Ana KORITNIK, 2015: The new literacies of online research and comprehension: to teach or not to teach. Journal of Baltic Science Education 14/4, 460–473.
Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, Andrej FLOGIE, 2018: Writing versus typing during science teaching: case study in Slovenia. Journal of Baltic science education 17/1, 84–96.
Metka KORDIGEL ABERŠEK, Boris ABERŠEK, 2013: A reading curriculum for the Homo zappiens generation: new challenges, new goals. Journal of Baltic science education 12/1, 92–106.
Donald J. LEU, Julie COIRO, Jill CASTEK, Douglas K. HARTMANN, Laure A. HENRY, David REINKING, 2008: New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension. Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. Ur. Cathy Collins Block, Sheri R. Parris, Peter Afflerbach. New York: Guilford Press.
Donald J. LEU, Elena FORZANI, Chris ROADS, Cheryl MAYKEL, Clint KENNEDY, Nicole TIMBRELL, 2014: The New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension: Rethinking the Reading Achievement Gap. Reading Research Quarterly 0/0, 1‒23.
Donald J. LEU, Elena FORZANI, Clint KENNEDY, 2015: Income inequality and the online reading achievement gap: Teaching our way to success with online research and comprehension. The Reading Teacher 68, 422–427.
Marieke LONGCAMP, Jean-Luc ANTON, Muriel ROTH, Jean-Luc VELAY, 2005: Premotor activations in response to visually presented single letters depend on the hand used to write: A study in left-handlers. Neuropsychologia 43/12, 1801–1809.
Marieke LONGCAMP, Celine BOUCARD, Jean-Claude GILHODES, Jean-Luc ANTON, Muriel ROTH, Bruno NAZARIAN, Jean-Luc VELAY, 2008: Learning through hand- or typewriting influences visual recognition of new graphics shapes: Behavioural and functional imaging evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20/5, 802–815.
Anne MANGEN, Jean-Luc VELAY, 2010: Digitalizing literacy: Reflections on the haptics of writing. Advances in Haptics. Ur. Mehrdad H. ZADEH. Vienna: IN-TECH web.
Anne MANGEN, Liss G. ANDA, Gunn OXBOROUGH, Kolbjorn BRØNNICK, 2015: Handwriting versus typewriting. Effect on word recall. Journal of Writing Research 7/2, 227–247.
Pam A. MUELLER, Daniel M. OPPENHEIMER, 2014: The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological Science 25/6, 1159–1168.
John PALFREY, Urs GASSER, 2008: Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic books.
Mark PRENSKY, 2001: Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9/5, 1–6.
Rand SPIRO, 2004: Principled pluralism for adaptive flexibility in teaching and learning. Theoretical models and processes of reading. Ur. Robert B. RUDDELL, Norman UNRAU. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Lawrence SHAPIRO, 2010: Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.
Ana M. TABOADA BARBER, John T. GUTHRIE, 2006: Contributions of Student Questioning and Prior Knowledge to Construction of Knowledge from Reading Information Text. Journal of Literacy Research 38/1, 1–35.
Copyright (c) 2020 University of Maribor Press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyrights
Authors of accepted manuscripts will retain copyright in their work, but will assign to Slavia Centralis the permanent right to electronically distribute their article. Authors may republish their work (in print and/or electronic format) as long as they acknowledge Slavia Centralis as the original publisher. Authors may also share the published version on their own websites, departmental webpages, or institutional repositories.
Plagiarism Policy
Slavia Centralis is a non-commercial, open access, electronic research journal. As such it pledges to uphold certain ethical principles regarding confidentiality, originality and intellectual fair play. Slavia Centralis takes copyright infringement and plagiarism very seriously and all submissions may be checked with duplication detection software.
Authors must:
- Ensure that all work submitted is original, fully referenced and that all authors are represented accurately. The submission must be exclusive and not under consideration elsewhere.
- Obtain all permissions from copyright owners for 3rd party material (e.g. quotations, illustrations, tables, etc.).