Impediments to Kindergarten Children Identifying Geometric Shapes

Marija Vorkapić; Jasmina Milinković Milinković; Mila Milošević Milošević

doi:10.18690/rei.2503

Marija Vorkapić University of Belgrade, Teacher Education Faculty
Jasmina Milinković Milinković University of Belgrade, Teacher Education Faculty
Mila Milošević Milošević University of Belgrade, Teacher Education Faculty

Keywords: a non-example, distractor, geometrical shape, properties of geometric shapes, kindergarten children.

Abstract

Research shows that children aged 3 to 6 years do not fully grasp the concept of geometric shapes. This paper aims to examine children’s intuitive knowledge of triangles and squares. We analysed the effects of distractors on identification and the neglected properties of (non)examples. The purpose of the study was to establish the developmental path in the identification of shapes. It was operationalized by determining types of interfering distractors in shape recognition and properties neglected. The data obtained from individual interviews were processed by the method of statistical and descriptive qualitative analysis. A classification was made of distractors and properties of non-examples affecting identification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bernabeu, M., Llinares, S., and Salvador, S. (2019). The evolution of a 9-year-old students’ understanding of the relationship among geometrical shapes. Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Netherlands: Utrecht.

Burger, W. F., and Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.5951/jre-sematheduc.17.1.0031

Clements, D. H., and Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (pp. 420–464). New York: Macmillan.

Clements, D. H., Swaminathan, S., Hannibal, M., and Sarama, J. (1999). Young children’s concepts of shape. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 192–212. https://doi.or-g/10.2307/749610

Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., and Joswick, C. (2018). Learning and teaching geometry in early childhood. Quadrante, 27(2), 7‒31. https://doi.org/10.48489/quadrante.22970

Đokić, O., and Zeljić, M. (2017). Teorije razvoja geeometrijskog mišljenja prema van Hilu, Fišbajnu i Udemon Kuzniaku [Theoretical frameworks in the development of geometrical thinking according to van Hiele, Fischbein and Houdement-Kuzniak]. Teme, 41(3), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME1703623D

Đokić, O., Jelić, M., and Ilić, S. (2020). The Correlation between Figural and Conceptual Properties of Angle and Cube in Pre-Service Teachers Geometric Reasoning. Teaching Innovations, 33(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2001001D

Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel

Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273689

Hannibal (1999). Young children’s developing understanding of geometric shapes. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.5.6.0353

Hershkowitz, R. (1989). Visualization in geometry–two sides of the coin. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1), 61–76.

Kellog, R. T. (1980). Feature frequency and hypothesis testing in the acquisition of rule-governed concepts. Memory & Cognition, 8(3), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197618

Koleza, E., and Giannisi, P. (2013). Kindergarten children’s reasoning about basic geometric shapes. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, and M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education. CERME 8. (pp. 2118–2127). Ankara: Middle East Technical University and ERME

Markman, E. (1988). Categorization and naming in children. Massachusetts: MIT.

Mitchelmore, M. C., and White, P. (2000). Development of angle concepts by progressive abstraction and generalization. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(3), 209–238. https://doi.or-g/10.1023/A:1003927811079

Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., Langdon, F. J., and Lunzer Trans, J. L. (1967). The child’s conception of space. New York: W. W. Norton.

Satlow, E., and Newcombe, N. (1998). When is a triangle not a triangle? Young children's developing concepts of geometric shape. Cognitive Development, 13(4), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.101-6/S0885-2014(98)90006-5

Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., and Levenson, E. (2008). Intuitive non-examples: the case of triangles. Educational, Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9133-5

Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Levenson, E., Barkai, R., and Tabach, M. (2015). Early years teachers’ concept images and concept definitions: triangles, circles, and cylinder. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47, 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0641-8

Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Waxman, S. R. (1999). The dubbing ceremony revisited: Object naming and categorization in infancy and early childhood. In D. L. Medin and S. Atran (Eds.), Folk Biology (pp. 233–284). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books

Walcott, C., Mohr, D., and Kastberg, S. E. (2009). Making sense of shape: An analysis of children's written responses. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/1-0.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.001

Wilson, S. (1986). Feature frequency and the use of negative instances in a geometric task. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.-17.2.0130

Štemberger, T. (2021). Statistical Significance and or Effect Size? Journal of Elementary Education, 14(4), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.14.4.485-500.2021

Žilkova, K., Partová, E., Kopácová, J., Tkačik, Š., Mokriš, M., Budínová, I., and Gunčaga, J. (2019). Young children's concepts of geometric shapes. London: Pearson.