Growth Performance of Rabbits using Different Methods of Weaning Group Formation

Authors

  • Nejc Sitar University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
  • Dejan Škorjanc University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences
  • Maja Prevolšek Povše University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences (Corresponding Author)
  • Janko Skok University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences (Corresponding Author)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18690/

Keywords:

rabbit, weaning, weaning methods, growth rate, feed conversion ratio

Abstract

In rabbit meat production, weaning is a crucial phase and must be conducted properly to achieve adequate growth performance and slaughter weight in the shortest possible time. Studies on rabbit weaning, particularly concerning weaning methods (i.e. different approaches to forming weaning groups) and their effects on production, are scarce. Our study compared three weaning methods in indoor and outdoor breeding environment. In our experiment, rabbits were weaned by body size (same size together; n = 27), by litter of origin (littermates together; n = 30) or at random (n = 57). All rabbits were housed in wire cages in groups of three. Body weight, daily weight gain and feed conversion rate (FCR) were monitored over a period of 8 weeks from weaning to slaughter. The breeding environment and weaning methods affected most of the parameters, yet the interaction between the studied effects was insignificant during the entire experimental period. With the body size-based and random method, the rabbits reached significantly higher final body weight (2348 g and 2263 g, respectively) than rabbits weaned with the litter-based method (2168 g). Similarly, daily weight gain was 27.2 g, 25.7 g and 24.0 g (p = 0.024) for rabbits weaned using the body size-based, random and litter-based methods, respectively. Regarding the effects of the breeding environment, indoor housing provided better production results. The rabbits kept indoors grew faster than the outdoor rabbits (27.2 g/day and 24.1 g/day, respectively; p < 0.001) and had a 15% higher final weight (2345 g indoors, 2174 g outdoors, p < 0.001). Feed conversion ratio was lower (p < 0.001) in the indoor housing (≈2.5) than in the outdoor housing (≈3.0). However, the body size-based weaning method was found to be the most efficient for growth performance and final body weight, regardless of environment (indoor or outdoor). Randomly formed weaning groups or those formed from littermates performed better indoors; however, the latter (i.e. from littermates) anyway remained inferior to rabbits from the other two groups. The study therefore showed that the approach to weaning group formation and the environment crucially influence the efficiency of rabbit weaner fattening and should be considered by breeders when weaning kits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Nejc Sitar, University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences

    Pivola 10, 2311 Hoče, Slovenia

  • Dejan Škorjanc, University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences

    Pivola 10, 2311 Hoče, Slovenia

  • Maja Prevolšek Povše, University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences (Corresponding Author)

    Pivola 10, 2311 Hoče, Slovenia

  • Janko Skok, University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences (Corresponding Author)

    Pivola 10, 2311 Hoče, Slovenia

References

Alfonso-Carrillo, C., García-Rebollar, P., De Blas, C., Ibáñez, M. A., & García-Ruiz A. I. (2014). Effect of late weaning and use of alternative cages on performance of does, suckling and fattening rabbits under extensive reproductive management. Livestock Science, 167, 425-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.05.018

2. ARSO, Slovenian Environment Agency. (2025). Meteorological data portal. Retrieved December 5, 2025, from https://meteo.arso.gov.si/

3. Bautista, A., Mendoza-Degante, M., Coureaud, G., Martínez-Gómez, M., & Hudson, R. (2005). Scramble competition in newborn domestic rabbits for an unusually restricted milk supply. Animal Behaviour, 70(5), 1011-1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.015

4. Camerlink, I., Proßegger, C., Kubala, D., Galunder, K., & Rault, J. L. (2021). Keeping littermates together instead of social mixing benefits pig social behaviour and growth post-weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 235, 105230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105230

5. Cervera, C., Blas, E., & Fernández-Carmona, J. (1997). Growth of rabbits under different environmental temperatures using high fat diets. World Rabbit Science, 5(2), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.1997.322

6. D’Agata, M., Preziuso, G., Russo, C., Dalle Zotte, A., Mourvaki, E., & Paci, G. (2009). Effect of an outdoor rearing system on the welfare, growth performance, carcass and meat quality of a slow-growing rabbit population. Meat Science, 83(4), 691-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.005

7. Dorning, J., & Harris, S. (2017). The Welfare of Farmed Rabbits in Commercial Production Systems: A scientific review. https://www.compassioninfoodbusiness.com/resources/rabbits/the-welfare-of-farmed-rabbits-in-commercial-production-systems-scientific-review/

8. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010L0063

9. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2025). FAOSTAT statistical database. Rome: FAO. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/

10. Fayez, I., Marai, M., Alnaimy, A., & Habeed, M. (1994). Thermoregulation in rabbits, CIHEAM. Options Méditerranéennes, 8, 471-474.

11. Klinar, T. (2012). Rabbit breeding [Pasemski kunci]. Založba narava.

12. Kovács, M., Bónai, A., Szendrő, Zs., Milisits, G., Lukács, H., Szabó-Fodor, J., Tornyos, G., Matics, Zs., Kovács, F., & Horn, P. (2012). Effect of different weaning ages (21, 28 or 35 days) on production, growth and certain parameters of the digestive tract in rabbits. Animal, 6(6), 894-901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111002254

13. Marai, I. F. M., Habeeb, A. A. M., & Gad, A. E. (2002). Rabbits’ productive, reproductive and physiological performance traits as affected by heat stress: a review. Livestock Production Science, 78(2), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00091-X

14. Mock, D. W, Parker, G. A., & Schwagmeyer, P. L. (1998). Game theory, sibling rivalry, and parent–offspring conflict. In L. A. Dugatkin, H. K. Reeve (Eds), Game theory & animal behavior (146-167). New York, USA Oxford University Press.

15. Oke, U. K., Herber, U., Obike, O. M., & Ogbonnaya, E. O. (2011). Effect of weaner body weight on growth traits of rabbits. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research, 1(1), 22-27.

16. Oladimeji, A. M., Johnson, T. G., Metwally, K., Farghly, M., & Mahrose, K. M. (2022). Environmental heat stress in rabbits: implications and ameliorations. International Journal of Biometeorology, 66(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-021-02191-0

17. Poigner, J., Szendrö, Zs., Lévai, A., Radnai, I., & Biró-Németh, E. (2000). Effect of birth weight and litter size on growth and mortality in rabbits. World Rabbit Science, 8(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2000.413

18. Sirotkin, A. V., Parkanyi, V., & Pivko, J. (2021). High temperature impairs rabbit viability, feed consumption, growth and fecundity: examination of endocrine mechanisms. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 74, 106478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2020.106478

19. Skok, J., & Škorjanc, D. (2014). Group suckling cohesion as a prelude to the formation of teat order in piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 154, 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.02.003

20. Sommerville, R., Ruiz, R., & Averós, X. (2017). A meta-analysis on the effects of the housing environment on the behaviour, mortality, and performance of growing rabbits. Animal Welfare, 26(2), 223-238. 10.7120/09627286.26.2.223

21. Szendrő, Zs., & Dalle Zotte, A. (2011). Effect of housing conditions on production and behaviour of growing meat rabbits: A review. Livestock Science, 137, 296-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.11.012

22. Xiccato, G., Trocino, A., Sartori, A., & Queaque, P. I. (2016). Effect of weaning diet and weaning age on growth, body composition and caecal fermentation of young rabbits. Animal Science, 77(1), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800053704

Downloads

Published

04.02.2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sitar, N., Škorjanc, D., Prevolšek Povše, M., & Skok, J. (2026). Growth Performance of Rabbits using Different Methods of Weaning Group Formation. Agricultura Scientia, 22(1-2). https://doi.org/10.18690/