Through the looking glass: methodological features of research of alternative schools

Snježana Dubovicki; Tomislav  Topolovčan

doi:10.18690/rei.13.1.55-71.2020

Snježana Dubovicki Univerza Josip Juraj Strossmayer v Osijeku, Pedagoška fakultet https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4770-3371
Tomislav Topolovčan Univerza v Zagrebu, Fakulteta za izobraževanje učiteljev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.13.1.55-71.2020

Ključne besede: alternativne šole, vzgoja in izobraževanje, raziskovalna metodolgija, družboslovne in humanistične študije, poučevanje

Povzetek

Pod lupo: metodološke značilnosti raziskovanja alternativnih šol. Na osnovi analize splošnih značilnosti alternativnih šol in z metodo pedagoškega raziskovanja smo oblikovali primerjavo in sintezo dobljenih
dejstev. Opozarja, da je na področju pedagogike sprejetje (pozitivistične) metodologije postalo globalen trend. Poudarja nekritično uporabo raziskovalnih orodij iz korpusa kvantitativne metodologije pri raziskovanju
specifičnih problemov vzgoje in izobraževanja ter pri raziskovanju alternativnih šol, pri čemer se kontekst raziskovanja pomembno razlikuje od konteksta raziskovanja konvencionalnih javnih šol.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Biografije avtorja

Snježana Dubovicki, Univerza Josip Juraj Strossmayer v Osijeku, Pedagoška fakultet

Docentka, Univerza Josip Juraj Strossmayer v Osijeku, Pedagoška fakulteta, Cara Hadrijana 10, 31000
Osijek, Hrvaška, e-pošta: sdubovicki@foozos.hr

Tomislav Topolovčan, Univerza v Zagrebu, Fakulteta za izobraževanje učiteljev

Docent, Univerza v Zagrebu, Fakulteta za izobraževanje učiteljev Savska 77, 10000 Zagreb, Hrvaška,
e-pošta: tomislav.topolovcan@ufzg.hr

Literatura

Akmansoy, V. and Kartal, S. (2014). Chaos theory and its application to education: Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Case. Educational Science: Theory & Practice, 14(2), pp. 510-518.

Arvin, F., Espinosa, J., Bird, B., West, A., Watson, S. and Lennox, B. (2018). Mona: An affordable open-source mobile robot for education and research. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 94(3-4), pp. 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-018-0866-9

Autio, T. (2017). Curriculum theory in contestation? American curriculum, European didaktik, and Chinese wisdom traditions as hybrid platforms for educational leadership. In M. Uljens and R. M. Ylimaki (eds.), Bridging educational leadership, curriculum theory and didaktik (pp. 257–282). Cham: Springer.

Avgitidou, S. (2019). Facilitating teachers as action researchers and reflective practitioners: New issues and proposals. Educational Action Research, DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2019.1654900

Biesta, G. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(2), pp. 175–192.

Biesta, G. (2015). On two cultures of educational research, and how we might move ahead considering the ontology, axiology and praxeology of education. European Educational Research Journal, 14(1), pp. 11–22.

Blair, B. G. (1993). What does chaos theory have to offer to educational administration? Journal of School Leadership, 3, pp. 579–596.

Bognar, B. (2009). Ostvarivanje suštinskih promjena u odgojnoj praksi posredstvom akcijskih istraživanja [Conducting significant changes in educational practice through action research]. Odgojne znanosti, 11(2), pp. 147–162.

Bognar, L. and Matijević, M. (2002). Didaktika [Didactic]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

Brinton, B. and Fujiki, M. (2003). Blending qvantitative and qvalitative methods in language research and intervention. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, pp. 165–171.

Carlgren, F. (1991). Odgoj ka slobodi [Education to freedom]. Zagreb: Društvo za waldorfsku pedagogiju.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.

Cutcliffe, J. R. and Goward, P. (2000). Mental health nurses and qualitative research methods: A mutual attraction? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, pp. 590–598.

Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (second edition) (pp. 1–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dick, B. (2019). The Promise and future of action research in education. In C. A. Mertler (ed.), The Wiley handbook of action research in education (pp. 439–459). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Doll, W. E. (1993). A postmodern perspective on curriculum. New York and London: Teacher College Press.

Dubovicki, S. (2016). Kreativnost u sveučilišnoj nastavi [Creativity in university teaching]. Osijek: Fakultet za odgojne i obrazovne znanosti, Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku.

Dubovicki, S. (2017). Futurološke metode istraživanja [Futuristic research methods]. In S. Opić, B. Bognar and Ratković (Eds.), Novi pristupi metodologiji istraživanja odgoja (pp. 203–221). Zagreb: Učiteljski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.

Dubovicki, S. (2019). Methodological creativity in pedagogical research – global challenge. In C. Mafalda (Ed.), Education and new developments Vol. II (pp. 36–40). Lisbon: InScience Press.

Dubovicki, S., Mlinarević, V. and Velki, T. (2018). Istraživački pristupi i metodološki okviri u istraživanjima budućih učitelja [Research approaches and methodological framework in the research of future teachers]. Nova prisutnost 16(3), pp. 595–611.

Gleick, J. (1988). Chaos. Making a new science. London: Heinemann.

Gorard, S. and Taylor, C. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Hagsted, H. (Ed.). (1997). Freinet-Pädagogik Heute. Beiträge zum Internationalen Celestin-Freinet-Symposium in

Kassel [Freinet pedagogy today. Contributions to the International Celestin Freinet Symposiumin Kassel]. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.

Halmi, A. (2001). Metodologija istraživanja u socijalnom radu: kvalitativni i kvantitativni pristup [Research methodology in social work: Qualitative and quantitative approach]. Zagreb: Alinea.

Halmi, A. (2003). Chaos and non-linear dynamics. New methodological approaches in the social sciences and social work practice. International Social Work, 46(1), 83–101.

Halmi, A. (2013). Temelji kvantitativne analize u društvenim znanostima. [Foundation of quantitative analysis in the social sciences]. Zagreb: Alinea.

Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Hill, J. E. and Kerber, A. (1967). Models, methods and analytical procedures in educational research. Detroid: Wayne State University Press.

Inayatullah, S. (2004). Causal layered analysis: Theory, historical context, and case studies In S. Inayatullah (ed.), The Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) reader: Theory and case studies of an integrative and transformative methodology (pp. 8-49). Taipei: Tamkang University Press.

Krbec, D. (1997). Obrazovanje u tranziciji: uloga privatne škole u obrazovnom sustavu Hrvatske [Education in

Transition: The Role of Private School in the Educational System of Croatia]. [Doctoral dissertation]. Zagreb: Filozofski fakultet.

Madelin, A. (1991). Osloboditi školu: obrazovanje a la carte [Free the school: Education a la carte]. Zagreb: Educa.

Matijević, M. (2001). Alternativne škole [Alternative schools]. Zagreb: Tipex.

Matijević, M. and Radovanović, D. (2011). Nastava usmjerena na učenika [Student-centered teaching]. Zagreb: Školske novine.

Matijević, M., Bilić, V. and Opić, S. (2016). Pedagogija za učitelje i nastavnike [Pedagogy for teachers]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga i Učiteljski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.

Mejovšek, M. (2013). Metode znanstvenog istraživanja u društvenim i humanističkim znanostima [Methods of scientific research in social and humanistic sciences]. Jastrebarsko: Naklada Slap.

Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Milojević, I. (2005). Educational futures: Dominant and contesting visions. London: Routledge.

Oelkers, J. (2010). Reformpädagogik: Entstehungsgeschichten einer international Bewegung [Reform pedagogy: The origins of an international movement]. Leipzig: Klett und Balmer Verlag Zug.

Oyaid, A. (2009). Education policy in Saudi Arabia and its relation to secondary school teachers’ ict use, perceptions, and views of the future of ICT in education. Exeter: University of Exeter.

Parker, H. J. (1974). View from the boys. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.

Pataki, S. (1938). Problemi i pravci reformne pedagogije [Problems and movements of the reform pedagogy]. Zagreb: Minerva.

Rajić, V. (2008). Stavovi učitelja i roditelja o razvoju privatnog i alternativnog osnovnog školstva u Republici Hrvatskoj [Teachers’ and parents’ attitudes towards the development of private and alternative primary education in the republic of Croatia]. Odgojne znanosti, 10(2), pp. 329–348.

Relja, R. and Matić A. (2008). Socio-etnografska istraživanja rada i organizacije [Socio-ethnographical research in work and organisation]. Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Splitu, 1, pp. 147–159.

Scott, D. and Usher, R. (Eds.). (2001). Understanding educational research. London and New York: Routledge.

Seitz, M. and Hallwachs, U. (2011). Montessori oder Waldorf? Ein Orientierungbuch für Eltern und Pädagogen [Montessori or Waldorf? An orientation book for parents and educators]. München: Kösel-Verlag.

Sekulić-Majurec, A. (2000). Kvantitativni i/li kvalitativni pristup istraživanjima pedagoških fenomena – neke aktualne dvojbe [A quantitative and/or a qualitative approach to the research of pedagogical phenomena – some current dilemmas]. Napredak, 141(3), pp. 289–300.

Sherman, R. R. and Webb, R. B. (Eds.). (2005). Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods. London and New York: Routledge.

Skiera, E. (2010). Reformpädagogik in Geschichte und Gegenwart: Eine kritische Einführung [Reform pedagogy in past and present: A critical introduction]. München: Oldenburg.

Smeyers, P. and Depaepe, M. (Eds.). (2008). Educational research: The educationalization of social problems. Berlin: Speinger.

Stein-Erlich, V. (1934). Metoda Montessori u školi [Montessori method in school]. Zagreb: Minerva.

Terhart, E. (2016). “Reaserch on teaching” in the USA and “Didaktik” in (West-) Germany. Influence since 1946. In J. Overhoff, & A. Overbeck (eds.), German-American educational history: Topics, trends, fields of research (Studien zur Deutsch-Amerikanischen Bildungsgeschichte, Band 1). (pp. 159–174). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhard.

Terhart, E. (2017). Interdisciplinary research on education and its disciplines: Process of change and lines of conflict in unstable academic expert cultures: Germany as an example. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), pp. 921–936.

Topolovčan, T. (2016). Art-based research of constructivist teaching. Croatian Journal of Education, 18(4), pp. 1141–1172

Topolovčan, T. (2017). Utemeljena teorija u istraživanjima odgoja i obrazovanja [Grounded theory in educational research]. In S. Opić, B. Bognar and S. Ratković (eds.), Novi pristupi metodologiji istraživanja odgoja (pp. 129–149). Zagreb: Učiteljski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.

Topolovčan, T. and Dubovicki, S. (2019). The heritage of the cold war in contemporary curricula and educational reforms. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(2), pp. 11–32.

Topolovčan, T., Rajić, V. and Matijević, M. (2017). Konstruktivistička nastava: teorija i empirijska istraživanja [Constructivist teaching: Theory and empirical research]. Zagreb: Učiteljski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.

Tröhler, D. (2013). The technocratic momentum after 1945, the development of teaching machines, and sobering results. Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society, 5(2), pp. 1–19.

Tröhler, D. (2014). Change management in the governance of schooling: The rise of experts, planners, and statistics in the early OECD. Teachers College Record, 116, pp. 1–26.

Tröhler, D. (2016). The medicalization of current educational research and its effects on educational policy and school reforms. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), pp. 749–764.

Vrcelj, S. and Mušanović, M. (2001). Prema pedagoškoj futurologiji [Towards the Futurology of Education]. Rijeka: Hrvatsko pedagoško-književni zbor.

Waldorf, G. (2001) Doing qualitative educational research. London and New York: Continuum. Watson, C. (2015). Futures narratives, possible worlds: Causal layered analysis and the problems of youth. In S. Inayatullah and I. Milojević (eds.) CLA 2.0 Transformative research in theory and practice (pp. 449–462). Taipei: Tamkang University Press.