Aktivna vloga nadarjenega učenca pri pripravi in evalvaciji individualiziranega programa
Povzetek
Prispevek osvetljuje pomen aktivne participacije nadarjenega učenca v procesu priprave in evalvacije individualiziranega programa (INDEP), ki izhaja iz učenčevih sposobnosti, želja in potreb. S kvalitativno vsebinsko primerjalno analizo tristo individualiziranih programov za nadarjene učence smo ugotavljali upoštevanje temeljnega načela vključenosti nadarjenega učenca v vsebinsko-ciljno pripravo in evalvacijo INDEP. Ugotovili smo, da se pri načrtovanju individualiziranih programov delno upoštevajo: aktivna vloga nadarjenega učenca, vsebinske prilagoditve in izzivi pri pouku, splošni in specifični cilji ter mentorska pomoč in podpora. Zapisani cilji v individualiziranih programih ne izkazujejo individualnih ciljev nadarjenega učenca ter so pogosto enako zapisani za vse nadarjene učence znotraj iste šole.
Prenosi
Literatura
Bela knjiga o vzgoji in izobraževanju v Republiki Sloveniji (2011). Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport.
Bezić, T., in Deutsch, T. (2011). Analiza uresničevanja koncepta – odkrivanje in delo z nadarjenimi učenci v devetletni osnovni šoli ob koncu šolskega leta 2009/2010 (poročilo o raziskavi). Ljubljana: Zavod RS za šolstvo.
Buchanan, N. K., Fox, R. A., in Martin, D. E. (2006). Gifted and talented programs in charter schools. Journal of School Choice, 1(2), 101–130.
Callahan, C. M. (2004). Asking the Right Questions: The Central Issue in Evaluating Programs for the Gifted and Talented. V C. M. Callahan (ur.), Program Evaluation in Gifted Education (str. 1–11). New York: Corwin Press.
Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Oh, S., Azano, A. P., in Hailey, E. P. (2015). What works in gifted education: Documenting the effects of an integrated curricular/instructional model for gifted students. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 137–167.
Chen, W. R., in Chen, M. F. (2020). Practice and evaluation of enrichment programs for the gifted and talented learners. Gifted Education International, 36(2), 108–129.
Childre, A., in Chambers, C. R. (2005). Family perceptions of student centered planning and IEP meetings. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40(3), 217–233.
Colorado Department of Education (2015). Comprehensive Program Plan. Pridobljeno s https://www.–cde.state.co.us/gt/comprehensiveprogramplan (Dostopno 6. 1. 2022.)
Duh M., in Lep K. (2008). Evidentiranje likovno nadarjenih učencev v osnovni šoli. Journal of Elementary Education, 1(3/4), 95–104. Pridobljeno s https://journals.um.si/index.php/education/a–rticle/view/210. (Dostopno 6. 1. 2024.)
Freeman, J. (2005). Permission to be gifted. Conceptions of Giftedness, 2, 80–97.
Gagné, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. V N. Colangelo in G. A. Davis (ur.), Handbook of Gifted Education (str. 60–74). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gallagher, J., in Desimone, L. (1995). Lessons learned from implementation of the IEP: Applications to the IFSP. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15(3), 353–378.
Johnson, S. L. (1999). Discovering the potential of gifted girls: The biological and physical science interests of gifted kindergarten girls. School Science and Mathematics, 99(6), 302–312.
Juriševič, M. (2012). Nadarjeni učenci v slovenski šoli. Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani.
Kahan, D. (2008). Recess, Extracurricular Activities, and Active Classrooms: Means for Increasing Elementary School Students’ Physical Activity. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 79(2), 26–39. Pridobljeno s https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2008.10598131 (Dostopno 3. 2. 2024.)
Koncept: Odkrivanje in delo z nadarjenimi učenci v devetletni osnovni šoli (1999). Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo. Pridobljeno s 18. 3. 2024, https://www.zrss.si/zrss/wp-content/uploads/koncept-dela-z-nadarjenimi-ucenci.pdf (Dostopno 18. 3. 2024.)
Konrad, M., Trela, K., in Test, D. W. (2006). Using IEP goals and objectives to teach paragraph writing to high school students with physical and cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41(2), 111–124.
Kukanja Gabrijelčič, M. (2014). Država, učitelj in delo z nadarjenimi učenci: med poslanstvom in odgovornostjo. Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 83–98. Pridobljeno s https://journals.um-.si/index.php/education/article/view/452 (Dostopno 18. 3. 2024.)
Kukanja Gabrijelčič, M. (2017). Poučevanje nadarjenih učencev v osnovni šoli: izbrane teme iz družboslovja. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem.
Kukanja Gabrijelčič M., in Volmut T. (2020). Poskus konceptualizacije talentiranosti na športnem področju. Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4), 475–496. Pridobljeno s https://doi.org/10.18-690/rei.13.4.475-496.2020 (Dostopno 18. 3. 2024.)
Letina A. (2021). Using Differentiation Strategies for Gifted Pupils in Primary School Science Classes. Journal of Elementary Education, 14(3), 281–301. Pridobljeno s https://doi.org/10.18690/-rei.14.3.281-301.2021 (Dostopno 18. 3. 2024.)
NAGC (2010). NAGC Pre-K-Grade 12 Gifted Programming Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Association for Gifted Children.
Olszewski-Kubilius, P., in Thomson, D. (2012). Gifted Education Programs and Procedures. V W. M. Reynolds, in G. E. Miller, (ur.), Handbook of Psychology, Educational Psychology (str. 389–410). New Jersey: Wiley. Pridobljeno s https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop207016 (Do-stopno 5. 4. 2021.)
Prain, V., Cox, P., Deed, C., Dorman, J., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C, Keeffe, M., Lovejoy, V., Mow, L., Sellings, P., Waldrip, B., in Yager, Z. (2013). Personalised learning: lessons to be learnt. British Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 654–676. Pridobljeno s https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192-6.2012.669747 (Dostopno 6. 11. 2022.)
Reis, S. M., in Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119–130.
Reis, S. M., Renzulli, S. J., in Renzulli, J. S. (2021). Enrichment and gifted education pedagogy to develop talents, gifts, and creative productivity. Education Sciences, 11(10), 615–634.
Renzulli, J. S. (2016). Reflection on Gifted Education: Critical Works by Joseph S. Renzulli and Colleagues. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-forming Gifted Education: Matching the Program to the Child. Tuscon, AZ: Great Potential Press, Inc.
Rogers, K. B. in Amidon, S. (2005). Develpoment and Implementation of Written Education Plans (WEPs) Grant. Columbus,OH: Ohio Association for Gifted Children.
Rogers, K. R. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382–396.
Strokovna izhodišča posodobitve Koncepta odkrivanja nadarjenih otrok, učencev in dijakov ter vzgojno-izobraževalnega dela z njimi. (2019). Pridobljeno s https://www.zrss.si/pdf/strokovna_izhodisca_nadarjeni.-pdf (Dostopno 25. 7. 2023.)
UNESCO (2009). Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education. Pridobljeno s https://unesdoc.unesco.or-g/ark:/48223/pf0000177849 (Dostopno 5. 5. 2023.)
VanTassel‐Baska, J. (2006). A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: a clarion call for enhanced gifted program development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), 199–215.
Vötter, B., in Schnell, T. (2019). Cross-lagged analyses between life meaning, self-compassion, and subjective well-being among gifted adults. Mindfulness, 10, 1294–1303.
Zakon i šoli/Zosn (1996). Uradni list RS, št. 12 (29. 2. 1996). Pridobljeno s https://www.uradni-list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-rs/vsebina?urlurid=20063535 (Dostopno 15. 2. 2023.)
Copyright (c) 2024 Mojca Gabrijelčič
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.