Uporaba strategij diferenciacije za nadarjene učence pri začetnem poučevanju naravoslovja

Alena  Letina

doi:10.18690/rei.14.3.281-301.2021

Alena Letina Univerza v Zagrebu, Učiteljska fakulteta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.14.3.281-301.2021

Ključne besede: differentiation, primary school science class, development of pupils' competences, gifted pupils

Povzetek

Namen raziskave je bil ugotoviti, v kolikšni meri so nadarjeni učenci vključeni v procese diferenciacije v začetnem poučevanju naravoslovja, katere strategije diferenciranega poučevanja učitelji izvajajo in kako pogosto. V raziskavo je bil vključen vzorec 134 učiteljev v osnovni šoli. Rezultati raziskave kažejo, da učitelji najpogosteje uporabljajo zasliševalne postopke za razvijanje študentskega mišljenja, vendar v redni učni načrt vnesejo le manjše spremembe, da bi zadovoljili potrebe znanstveno nadarjenih študentov. Nadarjeni učenci so redko vključeni v dejavnosti, kot so zagotavljanje izzivov in izbire, uporaba različnih bralnih in pisnih nalog, individualno delo, dejavnosti v katerih so vključene spremembe učnega načrta in dejavnosti v obogatitvenih centrov.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Ancrum, J. W., and Bean R. M. (2008). Differentiated Reading Instruction: What and How, Reading Horizons, 48(2), 133–146.

Archambault, F. X., Westberg, K. L., Brown, S. W., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C. L., and Zhang, W. (1993). Regular Classroom Practices with Gifted Pupils: Results of a National Survey of Classroom Teachers. The University of Connecticut Storrs, Connecticut.

Burstein, L., McDonnell, L. M., Van Winkle, J., Ormseth, T., Mirocha J., and Guitton G. (1995). Validating National Curriculum Indicators. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Chan, S. and Yuen, M. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs and practices for nurturing creativity in pupils: perspectives from teachers of gifted pupils in Hong Kong. Gifted Education International, 31(3), 200–213.

Cheung, H. Y. and Hui, S. K. F. (2011). Competencies and characteristics for teaching gifted pupils: a comparative study of Beijing and Hong Kong teachers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(2), 139–148.

Clay, M. (1991). Becoming Literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., and Gross, M. (Eds.) (2004). A Nation Deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest pupils (pp. 109-117). Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa Council of Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) (2006). Gifted and Talented Children in (and out) of the Classroom. Retrieved from https://giftedphoenix.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/gifted_children_060306.pdf (Accessed: 25. 5. 2020.)

Davidson, J., Davidson, B., and Vanderkam, L. (2004). Genius Denied: How to stop wasting our brightest young minds. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks

Davis. G. A., and Rimm, S. (2004). Education of the Gifted and Talented. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15, 119–147.

Hall, T., Strangman, N., and Meyer, A. (2007). Differentiated Instruction and Implications for UDL Implementation. NCAC Effective Classroom Practice Report.

Hawkins, V. J. (2009). Barriers to Implementing Differentiation: Lack of Confidence, efficacy and preserverance. NERA Journal, 44(2), 11–16.

Huebner, T. (2010). Differentiated Learning. Educational Leadership, 67, 79–81.

Hus, V., and Legvart., P. (2016). Using questions as a tool for encouraging higher thinking processes in a social science class, Školski vjesnik: časopis za pedagogijsku teoriju i praksu, 65(2), 211–226.

Kelemen, G. (2010). A personalized model design for gifted children’ education, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, 3981–3987.

Kim, M. (2016). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Enrichment Programs on Gifted Pupils, Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102–116.

Kukanja Gabrijelčič, M. (2014). Država, učitelj in delo z nadarjenimi učenci: med poslanstvom in odgovornostjo, Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 83–97.

Maker, C. J. (1982). Teaching Models in the Education of the Gifted, Pro-Ed, Austin, TX.

Matsko, V. and Thomas, J. (2014). The problem is the solution: Creating original problems in gifted mathematics classes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 153–170.

McQuarrie, L., McRae, P., and Stack-Cutler, H. (2008). Differentiated Instruction Provincial Research Review. University of Alberta. Retrieved from Retrieved from http://www.assembly.ab.ca/lao/library/egovdocs/2008/aled/168784.pdf (Accessed: 25. 5. 2020.)

Morelock, M. J. (1996). On the nature of giftedness and talent: Imposing order on chaos, Roeper Review,19(1), 4-12. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199609553774 (Accessed: 25. 5.2020.)

Mönks, F. J. (1992). Development of gifted children: The issue of identification and programming. In: F. J. Mönks and W. A. M. Peters (Eds.), Talent for the future. Proceedings of the ninth world conference on gifted and talented children (pp. 191–202). Assen: Van Gorcum.

Munro, J. (2012). Effective strategies for implementing differentiated instruction [Paper presentation]. 2012 - School Improvement: What does research tell us about effective strategies? Retrieved from https://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference/RC2012/27august/14 (Accessed: 7. 6. 2020.)

Pereira Da Costa, M. and Lubart, T. I. (2016). Gifted and talented children: Heterogeneity and individual differences, Anales de Psicología, 32(3), 662–671.

Petrovich, G. (2005). Gifted and Talented Education. University of Michigan.

Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150 159.

Rogers, K. (2002). Grouping the gifted and talented. Paper Review, 24, 103–107.

Rogers, K . B ., a nd S pan, P . ( 1993). A bility g rouping w ith g ifted a nd t alented p upils: research and guidelines. In: K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, and A. H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook of Research and Development of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 3–28). Oxford, Pergamon Press.

Schmitt, C., and Goebel, V. (2015). Experiences of high-ability high school students: A case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(4), 428–446.

Skribe Dimec, D. (2013). Diferenciacija pri poučevanju naravoslovja v prvem in drugem vzgojno izobraževalnem obdobju osnovne šole, Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2-3), 193–211.

Southern, W. T., Jones, E. D. (2004). Types of acceleration: Dimensions and issues. In Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., Gross, M. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest pupils (Vol. 2, pp. 5–12). Retrieved from http://www.accelerationinstitute.org/Nat– ion_Deceived/ND_v2.pdf (Accessed: 25. 5. 2020.)

Stavroula, V. A., Leonidas, K., and Mary, K. (2011). Investigating the Impact of Differentiated Instruction in Mixed Ability Classrooms: It’s [sic] impact on the Quality and Equity Dimensions of Education Effectiveness. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticschol–

ar.org/2105/2d28179d01df264cad4e9d015c19c6361256.pdf (Accessed: 10. 6. 2020.)

Taber, K.S. (2010). Challenging gifted learners: general principles for science educators; and exemplification in the context of teaching chemistry, Science Education International, 21(1), 5–30.

Taylor, B. M., Peardon, P. D., Peterson, D. S., Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading Growth in High-Poverty Classrooms. The Influence of Teacher Practices that Encourage Cognitive Engagement in Literacy Learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3–28.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). Differentiated Instruction in the Regular Classroom: What Does it Mean? How Does it Look? Understanding Our Gifted, 14(1), 3–6.

Tomlinson, C. A. and Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and Managing a Differentiated Classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Tomlinson, C. A. and McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating Differentiated Instruction: Understanding by Design. ASCD.

Tomlinson, C. A. and Strickland, C. A. (2005). Differentiation in Practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum, grades 9–12. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Tomlinson, C. A., Callahan, C., Tomchin, E., Eiss, N., Imbeau, M., and Landrum, M. (1997). Becoming Architects of Communities of Learning. Exceptional Children, 63(2), 269–282.

Wallace, B., Bernardelli, A., and Molyneux, C. (2012). TASC: Thinking actively in a social context. A universal problem-solving process: a powerful tool to promote differentiated learning experiences. Gifted Education International, 28(1), 58–83.

Wan, S. W. Y. (2015). Differentiated instruction: Hong Kong prospective teachers’ teaching efficacy and beliefs. Teachers and Teaching, 22(2), 1–29.

Yuen, M., Westwood, P., and Wong, G. (2005). Meeting the needs of pupils with specific learning difficulties in mainstream classrooms. International Journal of Special Education, 20(1), 67–76.

Yuen, M., Chan, S., Chan, C., Fung, D. C. L., Cheung, W. M., Kwan, T., and Leung, F. K. S. (2016). Differentiation in key learning areas for gifted pupils in regular classes: A project for primary school teachers in Hong Kong. Gifted Education International, 34(1), 36–46.