Uresničevanje pričakovanj visokošolskih učiteljev in asistentov od usposabljanj v okviru projekta INOVUP
Abstract
Meeting the expectations of higher education teachers and assistants for training within the INOVUP project. All university teachers work with students, but not all of them are aware that the teaching approach is as important and as relevant as the subject content. Within the INOVUP project, university teachers receive training in higher education didactics to raise the quality of instruction. The main premise of the project is that the teaching method is related to the acquired knowledge, understanding of the content, motivation for work and cooperation between students and teachers. The article addresses teachers’ responses to and expectations of these training events and how these expectations are met. The results show that more than three-quarters of the participants seek practical, usable knowledge. The participants are mostly satisfied with the training, which they consider to be a positive contribution to the acquisition of theoretical and practical knowledge and motivation for further deepening their knowledge. Based on these findings, recommendations can be put forward to upgrade training for future participants.
Downloads
References
Aškerc K. (2013). Didaktično usposabljanje visokošolskih učiteljev in sodelavcev z vidika razvoja človeških virov v visokem šolstvu, Magistrsko delo. Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta.
Aškerc Veniger, K. (2016). University teachers’ opinions about higher education pedagogical training courses in Slovenia. CEPS Journal, 6(4), 141–161.
Aškerc, K., Cvetek, S., Florjančič, V., Klemenčič, M., in Požarnik, B. M, Rutar, S. (2016). Izboljševanje kakovosti poučevanja in učenja v visokošolskem izobraževanju: Od teorije k praksi, od prakse k teoriji. Ljubljana: Center RS za mobilnost in evropske programe izobraževanja in usposabljanja.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and teacher education, 27(1), 10–20.
Baeten, M., Struyven, K., in Dochy, F. (2013). Student-centred teaching methods: Can they optimise students’ approaches to learning in professional higher education? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(1), 14–22.
Bidabadi, N. S., Isfahani, A. N., Rouhollahi, A., in Khalili, R. (2016). Effective teaching methods in higher education: requirements and barriers. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 4(4), 170.
Biggs, J., Harris, C. W., in Rudolph, J. (2019). Teaching for Quality Learning at Changing Universities. A tour de force of modern education history–an interview with Professor John Biggs. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 54–62.
Brinkley-Etzkorn, K. E. (2018). Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens. The Internet and Higher Education, 38(1), 28–35.
Campbell, J. L. (2018). "My Teacher Says I'm an Overachiever, but I Think He's an Overexpecter": Teacher Expectations, Self-Concept, and Academic Success, Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4546.
Castro Garcés, A. Y., in Martínez Granada, L. (2016). The role of collaborative action research in teachers' professional development. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 18(1), 39–54.
Cvetek, S. (2015). Učenje in poučevanje v visokošolskem izobraževanju: Teorija in praksa. Ljubljana: Buča.
De Graaff, Erik, Andernach, Toine, in Klaassen, Renate. (2006). Learning to teach, teaching to learn the impact of a didactic qualification programme on university teachers careers. M. E. Jones, F. Reichl, A. Steiner (ur). Proceedings of the 10th IACEE World Conference on Continuing Engineering Education (WCCEE). April 19–21, 2006, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Deaker, L., Stein, S. J., in Spiller, D. (2016). You can’t teach me: Exploring academic resistance to teaching development. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(4), 299–311.
Didakt.UM (2020). Vključevanje uporabe informacijsko-komunikacijske tehnologije v visokošolskem pedagoškem procesu. Pridobljeno s https://didakt.um.si/oprojektu/Strani/default.aspx (Dostopno: 30. marec 2020)
Digitalna univerza (2020) Digitalna univerza – z inovativno uporabo IKT do odličnosti. Pridobljeno s https://www.uni-lj.si/o_univerzi_v_ljubljani/projekti/projekti_2014_2020-/z_inovativno_uporabo_ikt_do_odlicnosti/ (Dostopno: 30. marec 2020)
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., &Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.
Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., in Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and teacher education, 67 (October 2017), 53–66.
Hassel, S., in Ridout, N. (2018). An investigation of first-year students' and lecturers' expectations of university education. C. Senior, D. Fung, C. Howard in R Senior (ur.) What Is The Role For Effective Pedagogy In Contemporary Higher Education? Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2218.
IKT v pedagoških študijskih programih UL (2018). Pridobljeno s http://ikt-projekti.uni-lj.si/splosno.html (Dostopno: 30. marec 2020)
INOVUP – Inovativne in prožne oblike poučevanja in učenja (2020). Pridobljeno s http://www.inovup.si/o-projektu (Dostopno: 30. marec 2020)
MacPhail, A., Ulvik, M., Guberman, A., Czerniawski, G., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., in Bain, Y. (2019). The professional development of higher education-based teacher educators: needs and realities. Professional development in education, 45(5), 848–861.
Ödalen, J., Brommesson, D., Erlingsson, G. Ó., Schaffer, J. K., in Fogelgren, M. (2019). Teaching university teachers to become better teachers: the effects of pedagogical training courses at six Swedish universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 339–353.
Omingo, M. (2019). Lecturers learning to teach: the role of agency. International Journal for Academic Development, 24(2), 122–134.
Picard, K., in Kutsyuruba, B. (2017). Teachers' engagement in professional development: A collective case study. Educational Policies and Current Practices, 2(2), 89–100.
Quinn, L. (2012). Understanding resistance: an analysis of discourses in academic staff development. Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 69–83.
Sadler, I. (2013). The role of self-confidence in learning to teach in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(2), 157–166.
Sander, P., Stevenson, K., King, M., in Coates, D. (2000). University students' expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher education, 25(3), 309–323.
Spivakovskiy, O., Kushnir, N., Valko, N., in Vinnyk, M. (2017). ICT Advanced Training of University Teachers. S. Batsakis et. al. (ur.) ICTERI – Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications. Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer, 176–190.
Teräs, H. (2016). Collaborative online professional development for teachers in higher education. Professional development in education, 42(2), 258–275.
IKT v pedagoških študijskih programih (2018). Pridobljeno s http://ikt-projekti.uni-lj.si/ splosno.html
van der Rijst, R., Baggen, Y., in Sjoer, E. (2019). University teachers’ learning paths during technological innovation in education. International Journal for Academic Development, 24(1), 7–20.
Zhao, G., Yang, X., Long, T., in Zhao, R. (2019). Teachers' perceived professional development in a multi-regional community of practice: Effects of beliefs and engagement. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23 (December 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100347 (Dostopno: 30. marec 2020)
Copyright (c) 2020 Matej Urbančič, Nina Kristl
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.