Integracija generativne umetne inteligence v oblikovanje učnih gradiv za angleščino v osnovni šoli: ugotovitve iz raziskav stališč indonezijskih učiteljev

Avtorji

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18690/rei5409

Ključne besede:

umetna inteligenca, oblikovanje učnih gradiv za angleščino, generativna umetna inteligenca, osnovnošolsko izobraževanje, zaznava učiteljev.

Povzetek

V študiji smo raziskovali zaznave učiteljev osnovnih šol o uporabi generativne umetne inteligence (GUI; angl. Generative Artificial Intelligence – GenAI) pri oblikovanju učnih gradiv za pouk angleščine. Podatke dvajsetih učiteljev iz Indonezije smo zbrali z intervjuji in analizo dokumentov. Ugotovitve kažejo, da učitelji GUI cenijo zaradi povečanja učinkovitosti in personalizacije, zlasti pri ustvarjanju delovnih listov, bralnih besedil, slovničnih vaj in seznamov besedišča. Kljub temu so se pojavile skrbi glede pedagoške rabe, etične rabe in pomanjkanja tovrstnega usposabljanja. V študiji poudarjamo nujnost stalnega, na praksi temelječega usposabljanja učiteljev za razvoj tovrstne pismenosti in podporo pri pedagoških odočitvah.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Ahmad, S. F., Alam, M. M., Rahmat, Mohd. K., Mubarik, M. S., and Hyder, S. I. (2022). Academic and administrative role of Artificial Intelligence in education. Sustainability, 14(3), 1–11. https://–doi.org/10.3390/su14031101

Al-Abdullatif, A. M., and Gameil, A. A. (2020). Exploring students’ knowledge and practice of digital citizenship in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(19), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i19.15611

Al-Adwan, A. S., Meet, R. K., Anand, S., Shukla, G. P., Alsharif, R., and Dabbaghia, M. (2025). Understanding continuous use intention of technology among higher education teachers in emerging economy: evidence from integrated TAM, TPACK, and UTAUT model. Studies in Higher Education, 50(3), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2343955

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cahyono, B. Y., Kurnianti, O. D., and Mutiaraningrum, I. (2016). Indonesian EFL teachers’ application of TPACK in in-service education teaching practices. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(5), 16–30. https://eajournals.org/ijelt/vol-4-issue-5-may-2016/indonesian-efl-teachers-application-tpack-service-education-teaching-practices/

Chang, D. H., Lin, M. P. C., Hajian, S., and Wang, Q. Q. (2023). Educational design principles of using AI chatbot that supports self-regulated learning in education: Goal setting, feedback, and personalization. Sustainability, 15(17), 12921. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU151712921

Chow, B. W.-Y., Hui, A. N.-N., Li, Z., and Dong, Y. (2023). Dialogic teaching in English-as-a-second-language classroom: Its effects on first graders with different levels of vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 27(6), 1408–1430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820981399

Creswell, J. W., and Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., and Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342

Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543

Eguchi, A., Okada, H., and Muto, Y. (2021). Contextualizing AI education for K-12 students to enhance their learning of AI literacy through culturally responsive approaches. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00737-3

George, B., and Wooden, O. (2023). Managing the strategic transformation of higher education through Artificial Intelligence. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.33–90/admsci13090196

Gozali, I., and Cahyono, B. Y. (2022). Studentsʼ perspective on the importance of EFL teachersʼ TPACK (technological pedagogical content knowledge) and XK (contextual knowledge) for learning English during the pandemic. PASAA Journal, 64, 244–277. https://har–rt.in.th/handle/123456789/1465

Hastomo, T., Sari, A. S., Widiati, U., Ivone, F. M., Zen, E. L., and Andianto, A. (2025). Exploring EFL teachers’ strategies in employing AI chatbots in writing instruction to enhance student engagement. World Journal of English Language, 15(7), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.5430/–wjel.v15n7p93

Hu, W., and Shao, Z. (2025). Design and evaluation of a GenAI-based personalized educational content system tailored to personality traits and emotional responses for adaptive learning. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 19, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100735

Ibrahim, A., and Shiring, E. (2022). The relationship between educators’ attitudes, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use of Instructional and web-based technologies: Implications from Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(4), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.285

Kong, S. C., Yang, Y., and Hou, C. (2024). Examining teachers’ behavioural intention of using generative artificial intelligence tools for teaching and learning based on the extended technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1–12. https://d–oi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100328

Kvale, S., and Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.

Lee, K. W., and Tseng, Y. F. (2025). When ChatGPT meets classical management theories: the role and impact of AI chatbots on management learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 33, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2482589

Leung, C. H. (2024). Promoting optimal learning with ChatGPT: A comprehensive exploration of prompt engineering in education. Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, 8(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.55493/5052.v8i2.5101

Li, J., Gao, X. (Andy), and Cui, X. (2023). Language teachers as materials developers. RELC Journal, 54(3), 881–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211061627

Lin, T., Zhang, J., and Xiong, B. (2025). Effects of technology perceptions, teacher beliefs, and AI literacy on AI technology adoption in sustainable mathematics education. Sustainability, 17(8), 3698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083698

Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Liu, X., and Xiao, Y. (2025). Chinese university teachers’ engagement with generative AI in different stages of foreign language teaching: A qualitative enquiry through the prism of ADDIE. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13117-9

Lucas, C. (2023). “Too young to learn English?”—Nurturing preschool children’s English language learning across an early years curriculum: A case study. Education Sciences, 13(9), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090949

Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, and Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

Massala, K. (2023). Navigating bias and ensuring fairness equity unveiled in the AI-powered educational landscape. Intelligence Artificielle et Technologie, 13(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.7202/11075–42ar

Mohamed, A. M. (2024). Exploring the potential of an AI-based Chatbot (ChatGPT) in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching: perceptions of EFL Faculty Members.

Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3195–3217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11917-z

Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., Kohnke, L., Ho, T. Y., and Kwong, T. (2024). Developing language teachers’ professional generative AI competence: An intervention study in an initial language teacher education course. System, 125, 103399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103–399

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publications.

Petrucco, C., Favino, F., and Conte, A. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions on the introduction of Generative AI in schools: A mixed-method study on the opinions of 1,223 teachers in the Veneto Region, Italy. Education Sciences & Society, 2, 17–37. https://doi.org/10.3280/ess2-2024–oa18406

Rudolph, J., Tan, Shannon., and Tan, Samson. (2023). War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 364–389. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23

Safitri, M., and Fithriani, R. (2024). Exploring higher education EFL students’ perception of AI writing tools in the 5.0 era. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.37329/–cetta.v7i1.3158

Saldana, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.

Silvola, A., Näykki, P., Kaveri, A., and Muukkonen, H. (2021). Expectations for supporting student engagement with learning analytics: An academic path perspective. Computers & Education, 168, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104192

Taşçı, S., and Tunaz, M. (2024). Opportunities and challenges in AI-assisted language teaching: Perceptions of pre-service EFL teachers. Araştırma ve Deneyim Dergisi, 9(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.47214/adeder.1575897

Tong, F., Zhang, H., Zhen, F., Irby, B. J., and Lara-Alecio, R. (2021). Supporting home literacy practices in promoting Chinese parents’ engagement in their children’s English education in low-SES families: An experimental study. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101816

Tugtekin, E. B., and Dursun, O. O. (2022). Effect of animated and interactive video variations on learners’ motivation in distance Education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3247–3276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10735-5

Yeh, H.-C. (2025). The synergy of generative AI and inquiry-based learning: transforming the landscape of English teaching and learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2335491

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.

Zulianti, H., Hastuti, H., Nurchurifiani, E., Hastomo, T., Maximilian, A., and Ajeng, G. D. (2024). Enhancing novice EFL teachers’ competency in AI-powered tools through a TPACK-based professional development program. World Journal of English Language, 15(3), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n3p117

Objavljeno

18.03.2026

Izjava o dostopnosti podatkov

 Izjava o dostopnosti raziskovalnih podatkov

Članek temelji na podatkih, ki so v celoti predstavljeni in obravnavani v besedilu prispevka, zato njihovo dodatno arhiviranje ni potrebno.

Številka

Rubrika

Znanstveni članki

Kategorije

Kako citirati

Hastomo, T., Widiati, U., Ivone, F. M., & Zen, E. L. (2026). Integracija generativne umetne inteligence v oblikovanje učnih gradiv za angleščino v osnovni šoli: ugotovitve iz raziskav stališč indonezijskih učiteljev. Revija Za Elementarno izobraževanje, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.18690/rei5409