Integrating Advanced Technologies in Education: Empowering Youth for a Sustainable Future through New Literacies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.5189Keywords:
advanced technologies, digital competence, humanoid robots, sustainability education, teacher training.Abstract
The quasi-experimental study explores how contemporary technologies, such as artificial intelligence and humanoid robots, enhance sustainability education for pre-service teachers. The study, involving 112 participants, assessed the effectiveness of these technologies compared to traditional methods in improving sustainability literacy. Pre- and post-tests revealed significant improvements in understanding sustainability concepts, with humanoid robots increasing response variability. Results highlight the technologies’ ability to engage educators in sustainability topics, promoting new literacies critical for addressing environmental challenges.
Downloads
References
Aberšek, B. (2018). Problem-based Learning and Proprioception. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Aberšek, B., Borstner, B., and Bregant, J. (2014). Virtual Teacher: Cognitive approach to E-learning material. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Asan, U., and Soyer, A. A. (2022). Weighted Bonferroni-OWA operator-based cumulative belief degree approach to personnel selection based on automated video interview assessment data. Mathematics, 10(1582). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10091582
Barut Tugtekin, E., and Koc, M. (2020). Understanding the relationship between new media literacy, communication skills, and democratic tendency: Model development and testing. New Media & Society, 22(10), 1922–1941. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819887705
Bauer, K., and Bai, Y. (2018). Using a model to design activity-based educational experiences to improve cultural competency among graduate students. Pharmacy, 6(48). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6020048
Bonnett, M. (2019). Environmental education and the issue of nature. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 71–85). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315144566-4
Burbles, N. C., Fan, G., and Repp, P. (2020). Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future. Geography and Sustainability, 1(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.–05.001
Chen, J., Zhuo, Z., and Lin, J. (2023). Does ChatGPT play a double-edged sword role in the field of higher education? An in-depth exploration of the factors affecting student performance. Sustainability, 15, 16928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416928
Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., and Leu, D. (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, and D. J. Leu (eds.), Handbook of Research on New Literacies (pp. 1–21). Routledge.
Cooper, H. (2009). Research questions and research designs. In P. A. Alexander, and P. H. Winne (eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 849-878). New York, London: Routledge.
Deguchi, A., Hirai, C., Matsuoka, H., Nakano, T., Oshima, K., Tai, M., and Tani, S. (2020). What is Society 5.0? In Hitachi-UTokyo Laboratory (ed.), Society 5.0: A people-centric super-smart society (pp. 1–24). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2989-4
Hajj-Hassan, M., Chaker, R., and Cederqvist, A.-M. (2024). Environmental education: A systematic review on the use of digital tools for fostering sustainability awareness. Sustainability, 16, 3733. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093733
Herič, J., Zemljak, D., and Aberšek, B. (2019). Human awareness and ecological footprint. In S. Uyaver (ed.), Proceedings of International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Energy Calculation (Turkish-German University). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3597797
Kerneža, M. (2023). Fundamental and basic cognitive skills required for teachers to effectively use chatbots in education. In V. Lamanauskas (ed.), Science and Technology Education: New developments and innovations. Proceedings of the 5th International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education (BalticSTE2023) (pp. 99-110). Scientia Socialis Press. https://doi.org/10.33225/BalticSTE/2023.99
Kerneža, M., and Zemljak, D. (2023). Science teachers’ approach to contemporary assessment with a reading literacy emphasis. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 5(22), 851–864. http://dx.doi.org–/10.33225/jbse/23.22.851
Kougias, K., Sardianou, E., and Saiti, A. (2023). Attitudes and perceptions on education for sustainable development. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3, 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s436–15-022-00174-w
Lemut Bajec, M. (2023). The role of formal and non-formal education in the development of technological literacy. Journal of Elementary Education, 16(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.–18690/rei.16.3.2711
Leu, D., Coiro, J., Castek, J., Hartman, D. K., Henry, L. A., and Reinking, D. (2008). Research on instruction and assessment in the new literacies of online reading comprehension. In C. C.
Block, S. Parris, and P. Afflerbach (eds.), Comprehension Instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 321-346). New York: Guilford Press.
Mian, S. H., Salah, B., Ameen, W., Moiduddin, K., and Alkhalefah, H. (2020). Adapting universities for sustainable education in Industry 4.0: Channel of challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 12(15), 6100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156100
Mishra, D., Parish, K., Lugo, R. G., and Wang, H. (2021). A framework for using humanoid robots in the school learning environment. Electronics, 10, 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ele–ctronics10060756
Niu, W., Zhang, W., Zhang, C., and Chen, X. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence autonomy in higher education: A uses and gratification perspective. Sustainability, 16, 1276. https://doi.–org/10.3390/su16031276
Oe, H., Yamaoka, Y., and Ochiai, H. A. (2022). Qualitative assessment of community learning initiatives for environmental awareness and behaviour change: Applying UNESCO education for sustainable development (ESD) framework. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063528
Okulich-Kazarin, V., Artyukhov, A., Skowron, Ł., Artyukhova, N., Dluhopolskyi, O., and Cwynar, W. (2024). Sustainability of higher education: Study of student opinions about the possibility of replacing teachers with AI technologies. Sustainability, 16, 55. https://doi.org/10.339–0/su16010055
Omotosho, A. O., Akintolu, M., Kimweli, K. M., and Modise, M. A. (2023). Assessing the Enactus global sustainability initiative’s alignment with United Nations sustainable development goals: Lessons for higher education institutions. Education Sciences, 13, 935. https://doi.or–g/10.3390/educsci13090935
Portuguez Castro, M., and Gomez Zermeno, M. G. (2020). Challenge-based learning: Innovative pedagogy for sustainability through e-learning in higher education. Sustainability, 12(10), 4063. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104063
Reilly, E. (2009). What is learning in a participatory culture? https://clalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/files/THSpring09WhatisLearning.pdf
Relmasira, S. C., Lai, Y. C., and Donaldson, J. P. (2023). Fostering AI literacy in elementary science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics (STEAM) education in the age of generative AI. Sustainability, 15, 13595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813595
Robinson, A. C., Downey, L., Ford, T. C., Lomas, J. E., and Stough, C. (2019). Green teens: Investigating the role of emotional intelligence in adolescent environmentalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 138(1), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.009
Saldana, J. (2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Research. SAGE.
Schina, D., Esteve-Gonzalez, V., Usart, M., Lazaro-Cantabrana, J. L., and Gisbert, M. (2020). The integration of sustainable development goals in educational robotics: A teacher education experience. Sustainability, 12(23), 10085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310085
Sila A., and Klančar A. (2024). TiDE Model – Creating Plurilingual Digital Materials with Future Preschool Teachers. Journal of Elementary Education, 17 (Special Issue), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.4579
Starc S., and Komninos N. (2023). Editors’ introduction. Journal of Elementary Education, 16 (Special Issue), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.16.Spec.Iss.2994
Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Villagra Sobrino, S., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Martinez Mones, A., and Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
UNESCO. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf?_gl=1*1apurm*_ga*MTc0MzU4MTA2Ny4xNzEyNDY1NTUx*_ga_TK9BQL5X7Z*MTcxNDk4NjU4OC4xLjEuMTcxNDk4NjYyMC4wLjAuMA.
UNESCO. (2022) Berlin declaration on Education for Sustainable Development. https://unesdoc.unesco–.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381228
Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Fellander, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M., and Fuco Nerini, F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11. https://www.nature.co–m/articles/s41467-019-14108-y
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., and Punie, Y. (2022). DigiComp 2.2. The digital competence framework for citizens. With new examples of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. European Union.
Xu, W., and Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: A systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 59. https://doi.org/1–0.1186/s40594-022-00377-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Andrej Flogie, Daniel Hari, Matevž Bratina, Dr. Maja Kerneža, Ddr. Boris Aberšek, Dejan Zemljak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.