The Social, Cognitive and Socio-Demographic Profile of Potentially Gifted Children

Keywords: giftedness, academic competence, sociability, gender, parental education

Abstract

The research results suggest that teachers find potentially gifted children to be academically more competent and sociable as opposed to students without the same potential. Likewise, potentially gifted children tend to have better academic achievements. When it comes to their socio-demographic profile, there seem to be more female students than male, and they often live in urban areas. Additionally, both parents of potentially gifted children show higher levels of education when compared to parents of non-potentially gifted children. The results of the hierarchical regression analysis point to significant effects by gender, place of residence and parental education have in explaining children’s academic competence and sociability; results also reveal significant incremental validity in the assessment of cognitive ability, motivation, and creativity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amini, M. (2005). Identifying stressors and reactions o stressors in gifted and non-gifted students. International Education Journal, 6(2), 136–140.

Ayğar, D. B., and Gűndoğdu, M. (2017). The relationship between gifted and unfigted students'self-perceptions and their parents'farenting styles: A structural equation model. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(3), 334–350.

Bain, S. D., and Bell, S. M. (2004). Social Self-Concept, Social Attributions, and peer Relationships in Four, Fith, and Sixth Graders Who Are Gifted Compared to High Achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 167–178.

Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., and Brown, M. (2000). Students' experiences of ability grouping -Disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Education Research Journal, 26, 631–648.

Çetinkaya, Ç. (2010). An Examination of Creative Thinking Skills of Gifted and Talented Preschool Children. International Journal of Early Childhood Education research, 1(1), 48–61.

Conejeros-Solar, M. L., and Gómez-Arízaga, M. P. (2015). Gifted Students' Characteristics, Persistence, and Difficulties in College. Roeper Review, 37(4), 241–251.

Cross, T. L. (2002). Competing with Myths about the Social and Emotional Development of Gifted Students. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 44–45. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4219%2Fgct-2002-76. (Accessed 20. 5. 2022.)/uploads/ 2019/02/

Curby, T. W., Rudasill K. M., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., and Konold, T. R. (2008). The role of social competence in predicting gifted enrollment. Psychology in the Schools, 45(8), 729–744.

França-Freitas, M. L. P., Del Prette, A., and Del Prette, Z. A. P. (2014). Social skills of gifted and talented childre. Estudos de Psicologia, 19, 4. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-294X2014000400006 (Accessed 18. 6. 2022. )/uploads,/2022/06/

Freeman, J., and Garces-Bacsal, R. M. (2015). Gender differences in gifted children. In M. Neihart, S. I. Pfeiffer and T. L. Cross (Eds.), The Social and Emotional Development of Gifted Children: What do we know?, Waco, Texas: Prufrock Press Inc. Retrieved from http://www.joanfreeman-.com/pdf/Freeman-Garces-Bascal-on-gender-2015.pdf /uploads 2022/06/. (Accessed 18. 6. 2022.)

Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studie, 15(2), 119–147.

Guénolé, F., Louis, J., Creveuil, C., Baleyte, J., Montlahuc, C., Fourneret, P., and Revol, O. (2013). Behavioral Profiles of Clinically Referred Children with Intellectual Giftedness. BioMed Research International, Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/540153 (Accessed .)/uploads/2019/02/

Guez, A., Peyre, H., Le Cam, M., Gauvrit, N., and Ramus, F. (2018). Are high-IQ students more at risk of school failure?. Inteligence, 71, 32–40.

Heilbronner, N. M. (2013). The STEM pathway for women: What has changed? Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 39–55.

Infantes-Paniagua, A., Fernández-Bustos, J. G., Ruiz, A. P., and Contreras-Jordán, O. R. (2022). Differences in self-concept between gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis from 2005 to 2020. Annals of psychology, 38(2), 278–294.

Kroesbergen, E. H., van Hooijdonk, M., Van Viersen, S., Middel-Lalleman, M. M. N., and Reijnders, J. J. W. (2015). The Psychological Well-Being of Early Identified Gifted Children. Gifted Child Quarterly, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215609113 (Accessed /uploads/20022/05/.)

Litster, K., and Roberts., J. (2011). The self-concepts and perceived competencies of gifted and non-gifted students: a meta-analysis, Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11(2), 130–140.

Lovecky, D. V. (1992). Exploring Social and Emotional Aspects of Giftedness in Children. Roeper Review, 15(1), 18–25, Retrieved from doi 10.1080/02783199209553451 (Accessed 20. 5 2022.)

Parekh, G., Brown, R. S., and Robson, K. (2018). The Social Construction of Giftedness: The Intersectional Relationship Between Whiteness, Economic Privilege, and the Identification of Gifted, Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 7(2) 1–32, Toronto: Canadian Disability Studies Association.

Petersen, J. (2013). Gender differences in identification of gifted youth and in gifted program participation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4): 342–348.

Peterson, J. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and Talented Individuals Do Not Have Unique Social and Emotional Needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 280–282.

Peyre, H., Ramus, F., Melchior, M., Forhan, A., Heude, B., and Gauvrit, N. (2016). Emotional, behavioral and social difficulties among high IQ children during the preschool period: Results of the EDEN mother, child cohort. Personalitx and Individual Differences, 94, 366–371.

Reis, S. M. (2002). Gifted females in elementary and secondary school. In. M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, and S.M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp 13–18), Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Reis, S. M., and Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 1, 119–130.

Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring definition of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 246–280). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Robinson, N. M. (2008). The Social World of Gifted Children and Youth. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psycho educational theory, research and best practices (pp. 33–51). NY: Springer Science + Business Media.

Sekulić-Majurec, A. (1995). Darovita djeca i obitelji: istine i zablude. Društvena istraživanja 18–19, 4–5, 551–561.

Shechtman, Z., and Silektor, A. (2010). Social Competencies and Difficulties of Gifted Children Compared to Nongifted Peers. Roeper Review, 34, 63–72.

Silverman, J. K. (2002). Asynchronous development. In Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N. M., and Moon, S. M. (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?, (pp. 31–37). Waco, TX: Prufrock press.

Stankovska, G., Pandilovska S., Taneska, A., and Miftari Sadiku S. (2013). Psychological apsects of gifted children, International Journal of Cognitive Research in science, engineering and education, 1(2), 33–36.

Šimić Šašić, S. Proroković, A., Klarin, M., and Šimunić A. (2020). Skala za procjenu potencijalne darovitosti kod djece. In V. Čubela Adorić, I. Burić, I. Macuka, M. Nikolić Ivanišević, and A. Slišković (Eds.), Zbirka psihologijskih skala i upitnika, Svezak 10 (pp. 87–103), Zadar: University of Zadar.

Terrassier, J. C. (1985). Dyssynchrony: Uneven development. In J. Freeman. (Ed.), The psychology of gifted children: Perspectives on development and education, (pp. 265–274). Chichester, England: Wiley.

Vialle, W., Heaven, P. C. L., and Ciarrochi, J. (2007). On Being Gifted, but Sad and Misunderstood: Social, emotional, and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong. Youth Study, 13/6, 569–586.

Zeidner, M., and Schleyer, E. J. (1998). The Big – Fish – Little – Pond Effect for Academic- Self Concept, Test Anxiety, and School Grades in Gifred Children. Contemporary Educationa Psychlogy, 24, 305–329.

Published
2023-12-05
How to Cite
Klarin M., Šimić Šašić S., & Proroković A. (2023). The Social, Cognitive and Socio-Demographic Profile of Potentially Gifted Children. Journal of Elementary Education, 16(4), 357-374. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.3116