Why We Are Not Free (Morally Responsible) and What (Does Not) Follow(s) from This

Authors

  • Tim Koprivnik University of Maribor, Faculty of Arts, Maribor, Slovenia

Keywords:

freedom, moral responsibility, (in)determinism, (in)compatibilism, Pereboom

Abstract

This article presents and critically evaluates Pereboom's article “Determinism al Dente” in which he mainly argues two things: firstly, hard incompatibilism is – because of “4-case argument” – the most convincing theoretical stance on freedom, determinism and their compatibilism; and secondly, objections against hard incompatibilism, namely that it prevents us from achieving important things in life, promotes immorality and impersonal relationships, and/or is practically impossible, are not convincing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Naslovnica: Analiza, Letn. 20 Št. 2 (2016)

Published

05.12.2016

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Koprivnik, T. (2016). Why We Are Not Free (Morally Responsible) and What (Does Not) Follow(s) from This. Analiza: časopis Za Kritično Misel, 20(2), 29–48. https://journals.um.si/index.php/analiza/article/view/6442