Professional Languages Alone Do Not Suffice for Successful and Socially Responsible Internal Communication between Different Cultures

  • Darja Kukovec
  • Matjaž Mulej
  • Simona Šarotar Žižek
Keywords: organizational culture, social responsibility, communication, internal communication, business languages

Abstract

Successful internal communication in an intercultural environment depends on the organizational culture, business environment, social responsibility, and leaders’ skills. Thus, internal communication and employee adaptation to changing business environments ask what a successful socially responsible internal communication requires. This contribution discusses theoretical foundations of qualitative research, how the organizational culture can define which direction the organization should chose to attain social responsibility, and how internal communication can improve understanding of professional language and be decisive in a working environment. The generated model offers insights into understanding social responsibility and organizational culture to improve internal communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Darja Kukovec

PhD student at the University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business, Slovenia
E-mail: darja.kukovec@student.um.si

Darja Kukovec is a master of business economics in the field of management. She received a master’s degree at the Faculty of Economics and Business in Maribor in 2010. After that, she started her business career abroad as a financial assistant to the CFO of institution for nuclear energy. After one year of work experience, she continued her business career as a specialist in telecomunications purchasing. After more than two years of work experience, she became employeed as a project purchaser for People Development Trainings.

Matjaž Mulej

University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business, Slovenia
E-mail: matjaz.mulej@um.si

Matjaž Mulej. Born in 1941, is a doctor of economy (in systems theory) and of (innovation) management. He is Professor Emeritus of systems and innovation theory at the Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Maribor. He developed the dialectical systems theory and innovative business theory (covering transitional conditions). He has published (with co- authors, mostly) more than 1,800 texts (including more than 70 books/proceedings and more than 60 articles in first-class journals) in almost 50 countries. He served as a visiting professor abroad for 15 terms, including at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY. He is a member of three international academies of sciences and arts.

Simona Šarotar Žižek

University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business, Slovenia
E-mail: simona.sarotar-zizek@um.si

PhD Simona Šarotar Žižek is Associate Professor at the University of Maribor’s Faculty of Economic and business. She holds a PhD in Economic and Business Sciences. She has been permanently completed her theoretical knowledge by practical work and career development in the Slovenian company Mura d. d. She joined University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business in 2007 as Assistant Professor in the field of Human Resource Management. She is author or co-author of articles in several international and Slovenian journals and scientific and expert conferences. She is also the main leader of many international projects.

References

Alvesson, M. & Sveningsson, S. (2008). Changing organizational culture (pp. 4-18). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Alvesson, M. & Sveningsson, S. (2014). Changing organizational culture. Second edition. London: Sage Page.

Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage Publication. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280072

Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2003). Women in entrepreneurship. The entrepreneurial advantage of nations. First Annual Global Entrepre- neurship Symposium, 29(1), 4-8.

Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1), 7-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2001.00007.x

Bhatt, R. M. (2001). World Englishes. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 527-550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.527

Bitenc, P. (2006). Interno komuniciranje v podjetju Cordia [Internal communication in Cordia organization]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani,Ekonomska fakulteta.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296

Cateora, P. R., & Graham, J. L. (2002). International Marketing, 11th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing. Crystal, D. (1997). The language that took over the world. The Guardian, 22(21).

Cunk, Z. (2016). Presoja inovativnosti menedžerjev s kazenskopravnega vidika kot bistvenega kriterija družbene odgovornosti, doktorska disertacija [Assessment of Innovation Managers with criminal Law aspects as the crucial Criterium of Social responsibility, Doctoral Dissertations]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

Dauber, D., Gerhard, F., & Yolles, M. (2012). A configuration model of organizational culture. Sage Open, 1(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012441482

Denison, D. eds. (2012). Leading culture chnge in global organizations: Aligning culture and strategy. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Felber, C. (2012). Die Gemeinwohl-Ökonomie. Eine demokratische Alternative wächst. Wien: Deuticke im Paul Zsolnay Verlag.

Fullan, M. (2014). Leading in a culture of change personal action guide and workbook. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Golobič, M. (2010). Transformation processes of Alpine landscapes and policy responses: top-down and bottom-up views. Society and Natural Resources, 23(3), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802029177

Gostiša, M. (2014). Ekonomska demokracija kot nova sistemska paradigma kapitalizma [Economic democracy as a new systemic paradigm of capitalism]. Kranj: ŠCID.

Gostiša, M. (2017). Ekonomska demokracija v 21. Stoletju [Economic democracy in the 21st century]. Kranj: ŠCID – Študijski center za industrijsko demokracijo.

Hrast, A., Lorbek, D., Mulej, M., eds. (2015). Proceedings of all Ten IRDO International Conferences: Social Responsibility and Current Challenges. Maribor: IRDO - Institute for Development of Social Responsibility.

Hrast, A., Slapnik, T. & Mulej, M. (2017). Nacionalna strategija družbene odgovornosti v Sloveniji – idejni osnutek [National strategy of social responsibility in Slovenia - Conceptual draft]. In: Mulej, M., & Bergant, Ž. (2017). Družbena odgovornost in izzivi časa 2017: Dodana vrednost kot poslovna informacija z vidika družbene odgovornosti in trajnostnega razvoja podjetij [Value added as business information from the view of social responsibility & enterprise sustainability] (pp. 13-16). Retrieved from www.irdo.si.

Hrastelj, T., & Makovec-Brenčič, M. (2003). Mednarodno trženje [International marketing]. Ljubljana: Založba GV.

ISO (2010): 26000. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/discovering_iso_26000.pdf.

Jaakson et al. (2012). Is there a coherence between organizational culture and changes in corporate social responsibility in an economic downturn? Baltic Journal of Management, 7(2), 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261211219813

Keyton, J. D., Ford, J., & Smith, F. L. (2012). Communication, collaboration and identification as facilitators and constraints of multiteams systems. Multiteam Systems: An Organization Form for Dynamic and Complex Environments, 21, 173-190.

Koskinen, Y., eds. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and organization risk. Theory and empirical evidence (pp. 1- 64). Retrieved from http://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/working_papers/documents/SSRN-id1977053.pdf.

Lipičnik, B. (2005). Reševanje konfliktov, ne nasprotij [Conflict resolution, and not the opposite]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

Martin, R. (2002). Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 427-449. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.427

McWiliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility; strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x

McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies 43(1), 1-18.

Meyer, S. D., & Hathaway, W. (1993). Competition and cooperation in social movement coalitions. Lobbying for peace in the 1980s. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 38, 157-183.

Mihalič, R. (2006). Management človeškega kapitala [Human capital management]. Škofja Loka: Mihalič in Partner d.n.o. Milfelner, B., Potočnik, A., & Šarotar Žižek, S. (2015). Social responsibility, human resource management and organizational performance. System Research and Behavior Science, 32(2), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2263

Možina, S., Tavčar, M., Zupan, N. & Kneževič, N. (2004). Poslovno komuniciranje [Business Communication]. Maribor: Obzorja, založništvo in izobraževanje.

Mulej, M. & Hrast, A. (2016). Nehajte sovražiti svoje otroke in vnuke, 2. knjiga [Stop hating your children and grandchildren, 2nd Book]. Maribor: IRDO- Institute for development of social responsibility.

Mulej, M. (1979). Creative work and dialectical systems theory. Maribor: Mladinska knjiga.

Mulej, M., & Dyck, R., eds. (2014, 2015). Social responsibility beyond neo-liberalism and charity; four books. Shirjah UAE Bentham Science: E-book, 33 chapters, 48 authors from 13 countries 1. SR – A Non-Technological Innovation Process; 2. SR – Range of Perspectives per Topic and Countries; 3. SR – Sustainability, Education and Management and 4. SR – Methods, Dilemmas and Hopes.

Mumel, D. (2008). Komuniciranje v poslovnem okolju [Communication in a business environment]. Maribor: De Vesta.

Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence. London: Harper and Row.

Potočnik, A. (2016). Viabilna regija - rezultat inoviranja z dialektično teorijo sistemov in kibernetiko poslovnih sistemov, doktorska disertacija [Viable region – result of innovation process applying the dialectical systems theory and cybernetics of business systems, Doctoral Dissertation]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

Quible, Z. K. (1991). Writing competencies needed by business employers. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 33, 33-51.

Radej, B., Golobič, M., & Istenič, M. Č. (2010). Beyond new public management doctrine in policy impact evaluation. Slovenian Evaluation Society, Retrieved from:https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-1YD7BDLY/c93535f3-0157-4807-adaf-43303efde43c/PDF.

Rašič, K. (2015). Sistem indikatorjev tehnično-tehnoloških raziskav, inovativnosti in znanja na primeru tranzicijskega gospodarstva, doktorska disertacija [The system of the technical-technology research, innovation and knowledge indicators in a transitional economy, Doctoral Dissertation]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

Rozman, R. (2007). Pomeni in zahtevnost analiziranja za boljše odločanje [Meaning and complexity of analysis for better decision making]. Zbornik referatov 13. strokovnega posvetovanja o sodobnih vidikih analize poslovanja in organizacije [Collection of 13th edition of professional papers on professional consultations on modern aspects of business analysis and organization] (pp. 9-23). Portorož: Zveza ekonomistov Slovenije.

Rozman, R. (2008). Spreminjanje kulture v združbah [Changing culture in organizations]. 9. znanstveno posvetovanje o organizaciji [9th Scientific consultation on the organization] (pp. 57-59). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za organizacijske vede.

Rozman, R. (2010). Razmerja med organizacijskimi procesi upravljanja in ravnateljevanja, koordinacije in odločanja [Relationships between organizational processes of management and governance, coordination and decision-making]. In: 11. znanstveno posvetovanje o organizaciji: Koordinacijski in komunikacijski vidiki organizacije združb [11th Scientific organizational consultation: Coordination and communication aspects of the organization entities] (pp. 15-21). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za organizacijske vede UM.

Šarotar-Žižek, S. & Mulej, M. (2013). Social responsibility: A way of requisite holism of humans and their well-being. Kybernetes, 42(2), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921311310639

Šarotar-Žižek, S., Mulej, M., & Treven, S. (2009). Dobro počutje/subjektivna blaginja sodelavcev kot bistveni dejavnik prehoda v inovativno družbo [Well-being / subjective well-being of employees as an essential factor in the transition to an innovative society]. Organizacija, 42(3), A122-A132.

Šarotar-Žižek, S., Treven, S., & Mulej, M. (2013). Creativity-based well-being of employees as a basis of future economy and society. Emerald Insight, 43(2), 210-227.

Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American psychologist. San Francisco: A Wiley Imprint. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Schwab, K. (2016). Četrta industrijska revolucija [Fourth Industrial Revolution]. World Economic Forum, Ženeva. Retrieved from: http://assets.cdnma.com/8475/assets/Cetrta-industrijska-revolucija.pdf.

Štrukelj, T., & Boršič, D. (2014). Inoviranje posameznika, podjetij in družbe za družbeno odgovornost in dobro počutje [Innovating individuals, organizations and society for social responsibility and well-being]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta, 1 optični disk (CD-ROM).

Štrukelj, T. (2015). Dialektični sistem vidikov za inoviranje upravljanja in vodenja tranzicijskega podjetja [Dialectical system of viewpoints for innovating of governance and management of a transitional enterprise]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (2002). Organizational behavior, solutions for management. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Terpstra, V., & Sarathy, R. (2000). International marketing. Fort Worth: Dryden Press.

Thill, J.V., & Bovee, C.L. (2002). Essentials of business communication. Boston: South End Press.

Treven, S. (2001). Mednarodno organizacijsko vedenje [International Organizational Behavior]. Ljubljana: GV.

Verčič, A.T., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2012). Internal communication. Definition, parameters, and the future. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.019

Vidovič-Muha, A. (2003). Sodobni položaj nacionalnih jezikov v luči jezikovne politike [Modern position of national languages regarding to the language policy] (pp. 5–25). Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta,.

Visser, W. (2005). Corporate citizenship in South Africa: A review of progress since democracy. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 18, 18-20. https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2005.su.00004

Waldman, D. A., et al. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 823-837. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400230

Waldman, D. A., Ramirez, G. G., House, R. J., & Puranam, P. (2004). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived enviromental uncertainity. Academy of management Journal, 44(1), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069341

Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758-769. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279099

Wright, M. (1999). Influences on learner attitudes towards foreign language and culture. Educational Research, 41(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188990410207

Zore, M. (2016). Krepitev inovativnosti podjetij v Sloveniji z razvojem družbene odgovornosti, doktorska disertacija [Strengthening Slovene Enterprises’ Innovativeness By Development Of CSR, Doctoral Dissertations]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

Zupančič, M. (2016). Inovacija upravljanja starejših znanjskih sodelavcev kot dejavnik inovativnosti in konkurenčnosti trga dela kot podsistema gospodarstva v Sloveniji [Innovation of management of older knowledge workers as a factor of innovativeness and competiveness of the labour market as a subsystems of economy in Slovenia]. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko poslovna fakulteta.

Published
2018-07-22
How to Cite
Kukovec D., Mulej M., & Šarotar Žižek S. (2018). Professional Languages Alone Do Not Suffice for Successful and Socially Responsible Internal Communication between Different Cultures. Naše gospodarstvo/Our Economy, 64(3), 47-55. Retrieved from https://journals.um.si/index.php/oe/article/view/2179