The Simplification of Public Administration: A Managerial Perspective
Abstract
The paper addresses the issue of complexity in the administrative processes
of public institutions: in particular, accounting routines and processes are
examined. Back-office activities, although having a mere supporting role
in the delivery of public services, absorb a relevant part of the resources
of public institutions. The aim of the paper is to analyse the factors that
contribute to the enhancement of complexity of these activities. The paper
is based on an in-depth analysis of two Italian public organisations: a
university and an ASP (agency for services to persons). Italy is an interesting
context since simplification policies have been adopted in the country at
central government level and in specific sectors of public administration,
however, at the institutional level, simplification initiatives depend on the
initiative of the single organisation. The cases described in this paper show
that complexity stems from the need for inspectory controls (which is typical
of the law) as well as from the volume of information requested (which is
typical of management studies) for different stakeholders and at different, yet
correlated, levels. The paper suggests that public management scholars have
the opportunity and the burden of a contribution in this field.
Downloads
References
Agasisti T., (2017). Management of Higher Education Institutions and the Evaluation of their Efficiency and Performance, Tertiary Education and Management, 23(3), 187-190, doi: 10.1080/13583883.2017.1336250
Agasisti, T., Catalano, G., Di Carlo, F., & Erbacci, A. (2015). Accrual accounting in Italian universities: a technical perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(6), 494-508. DOI: 10.1108/IJPSM-02-2015-0026
Bartoli A., Jeannot G., Larat F. (2016). La simplification des formes et modalités de l'action publique: origines, enjeux et actualitè, Revue Francaise d'aminisration publique, 157(1), 7-22. DOI: 10.3917/rfap.157.0007
Bouckert G., Peters B.G. (2002). Performance measurement and management: The Achilles' hell in admnistrative modernization. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), 359-362. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2002.11643672
Bouckaert G., Halligan J. (2007). Managing Performance: International Comparisons. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203935958
Busetti S., Dente B. (2014). Focus on the finger, overlook the moon: the introduction of performance management in the administration of Italian universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(2), 225-237. DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2014.884674
Caccia L. and Steccolini I. (2006). Accounting change in Italian local governments: what’s beyond managerial fashion? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17, 154-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2003.05.004
Carlin T.M. (2005). Debating the Impact of Accrual Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 21(3), 309-336.
Christensen, M. (2007). What we might know (but aren't sure) about public-sector accrual accounting. Australian Accounting Review, 17(41), 51-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2007.tb00453.x
Christiaens J. and Rommel J. (2008). Accrual Accounting Reforms: Only for Businesslike (Parts of) Governments. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1), 59-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00443.x
Cohen, S., Rossi, F. M., Caperchione, E., & Brusca, I. (2021). Debate: If not now, then when? Covid-19 as an accelerator for public sector accrual accounting in Europe. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 10-12. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1834714
Cooper R., Kaplan R.S. (1988). Measure Costs Right: Make the Right Decisions. Harvard Business Review Sept-Oct., 96-103.
Collison S., Melvin J. (2012). From Complexity to Simplicity. Unleash Your Organizations' Potential!, Palgrave macmillan.
De Witte, K., & López-Torres, L. (2017). Efficiency in education: A review of literature and a way forward. Journal of the Operational Research Society 6, 339-363. DOI: 10.1057/jors.2015.92
Ferrari G.F. (2018). Simplification and consent in administrative action: a comparative perspective, Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper Series, No. 3126763. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3126763
Ferry M., Polverari L. (2018). Research for REGI Committee – Control and simplification of procedures within ESIF, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/601972/IPOL_STU(2017)601972_EN.pdf
Gobba R.M. (2020). Administrative simplification strategy with reference to the Egyptian case, Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/JHASS-05-2020-0069
Guthrie J. (1998). Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector–rhetoric or reality. Financial accountability & management, 14(1), 1-19. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0408.00047
Guyomarch A. (1999). ‘Public Service’, ‘Public Management’ And The ‘Modernization’ Of French Public Administration. Public Administration, 77 (1), 171-193. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00149
Halachmi A. (1995). Re-engineering and public management: some issues and considerations. International Review of Administrative Sciences 61, 329-341.
Hood C. (1991). ‘A Public Management for All Seasons?’ Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Jagalla T., Becker S.D., Weber J. (2011). A taxonomy of the Perceived Benefits of Accrual Accounting and Budgeting: Evidence from German States. Financial Accountability & Management 27(2), 134-163. DOI: j.1468-0408.2011.00520.x
Kaplan, R.S., Anderson S.R. (2007). Time Driven Activity Based Costing. A simpler and more powerful path to higher profits. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
Khan Z. (1989) Simplification and reduction of procedures and control and deregulation: experiences of Pakistan. International Review of Administrative Science, 55, 183-197.
Kidneigh, J. C. (1954). Simplification in Administration: A Point of View. Social Service Review 28(2), 137-145.
Lapsley, I., Mussari, R., & Paulsson, G. (2009). On the adoption of accrual accounting in the public sector: a self-evident and problematic reform. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 719-723. DOI: 10.1080/09638180903334960
Merloni F., Pioggia A. (2018). European Democratic Institutions and Administrations. Cohesion and Innovation in Times of Economic Crisis. Spinger. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72493-5
Mitchell R.D., Bradley R.A., Donna J.W. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
Moore M.H. (1995). Creating Public Value. Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press.
OECD (2011). Administrative Simplification in Poland. Making Policies Perform DOI: 10.1787/9789264097261.
Ongaro E. (2004). Process management in the public sector. The experience of one-stop shops in Italy. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(1), 81-107. DOI 10.1108/09513550410515592
Osborne S.P, McLaughlin K. (2005). The New Public Management in context, in New Public Management: current trend and future prospects, McLaughlin K., Osborne S.P., Ferlie E. Editors, Routledge.
Paulsson, G. (2006). Accrual accounting in the public sector: experiences from the central government in Sweden. Financial Accountability & Management, 22(1), 47-62.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. The Free Press.
Regonini, G. (2016). Administrative Simplification Between Utopia and Nightmare. Utopian Discourses Across Cultures, 105. Retrieved from https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/30024/650072.pdf?sequence=1#page=107
Rinaldi M., Montanari R., Bottani E., (2015). Improving the efficiency of public administrations through business process reengineering and simulation: A case study. Business Process Management Journal, 21(2), 419-462. DOI: 10.1108/ BPMJ-06-2014-0054.
Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: how managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Stoker G. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked governance?, American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41-57. DOI: 10.1177/0275074005282583
Travi A., Occhetti D., Gambino N. (2018 ). Administrative Simplification as an Instrument for Coping with the Economic Crisis, in F.Merloni and A.Pioggia (eds.) European Democratic Institutions and Administrations, 241-263.
Van Dooren W., Bouckaert G., Halligan J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
