Post-Contractual Non-Compete Clause in Commercial Agency Contracts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18690/lexonomica.17.1.59-78.2025Keywords:
commercial agent, indemnity, commission, post-contractual non-compete clause, monthly compensation for post-contractual non-compete clause, Directive 86/653/EECAbstract
This paper deals with the legal regime governing post-contractual non-compete clauses in commercial agency contracts, analysing Slovenian legislation and its compliance with Directive 86/653/EEC. The Slovenian Obligations Code (OZ) requires the mandatory payment of compensation for compliance with a non-compete clause only in cases where the contract is terminated for reasons attributable to the principal. The author stresses that such a regime may lead to a restriction of contractual freedom without adequate compensation, which is not in line with the spirit of the Directive. Based on a review of the regimes in respect of non-compete clauses after the termination of a commercial agency contract in various European countries, including Croatia, the author finds that the regimes vary considerably between countries. The paper also focuses on the impact of non-compete clauses on indemnity, as the OZ requires such clauses to be taken into consideration in determining the amount. The author draws attention to the need for a fair balance of interests and for legislation to be revised to ensure that agents are protected against disproportionate restrictions without adequate compensation.
Povzetek članka v slovenskem jeziku (abstract in Slovene language):
Članek obravnava pravno ureditev konkurenčne klavzule po prenehanju pogodbe o trgovskem zastopanju, v okviru katere analizira slovensko zakonodajo in njeno skladnost z Direktivo 86/653/EGS. Slovenski Obligacijski zakonik (OZ) zahteva obvezno plačevanje odmene za spoštovanje konkurenčne klavzule zgolj v primerih, ko je pogodba prenehala zaradi razlogov na strani naročitelja. Po mnenju avtorja takšna ureditev lahko vodi v omejitev pogodbene svobode brez ustreznega plačila, kar ni v skladu z duhom direktive. Na podlagi pregleda ureditev konkurenčne klavzule po prenehanju pogodbe o trgovskem zastopanju v različnih evropskih državah, tudi na Hrvaškem, avtor ugotavlja, da se ureditev po posameznih državah zelo razlikuje. Avtor se osredotoča tudi na vpliv konkurenčne klavzule na odpravnino, saj OZ zahteva njeno upoštevanje pri določanju višine. Opozarja tudi na potrebo po pravičnem ravnotežju interesov in prilagoditvi zakonodaje, ki bi zagotavljala zaščito zastopnika pred nesorazmernimi omejitvami brez primernega nadomestila.
Downloads
References
Bortolotti, F., Bortolotti S. (2022), Country Report Italy, Commercial Agency (Torino: International Distribution Institute).
Balke, M., de Groot, S. E. (2010), Der Handelsvertreterausgleich nach § 89 b HGB im Umbruch, Neue Juristische Online 29, p. 1551-1556.
Emde, R (2014), Vertriebsrecht, Kommentierung zu §§ 84 bis 92c HGB, Handelsvertreterrecht, Vertragshändlerrecht, Franchiserecht, 3. Auflage (Berlin: De Gruyter Recht).
Engelmann, J. (2017), International Commercial Arbitration and the Commercial Agency Directive, A perspective from Law and Economics (Berlin: Springer International Publishing).
Fock, T. (2001), Die europäische Handelsvertreter-Richtlinie Kompetenzgrundlage, Systematik, Angleichungserfolg (Baden-Baden: Nomos).
Friedl, A. (2018), Nadomestilo distributerju ob prenehanju pogodbe, Pravna praksa 37, no. 36–37, p. 2–7.
Gregersen, P. E. P. (2023), Country Report Denmark, Commercial Agency (Torino: International Distribution Institute).
Herresthal, C., Henssler M., Paschke M. (Ed.) (2020), Beck-online. GrossKommentar zum HGB (Munich: C.H. Beck).
Kerčmar, S. (2024a), Der Ausgleichsanspruch des Handelsvertreters nach slowenischem Recht im Lichte der EU-Richtlinie 653/86 -The Commercial Agent’s Indemnity under Slovenian Law in the Light of EU Directive 653/86, Internationales Handelsrecht 24, no. 3, p. 89-96.
Kerčmar, S. (2024b), Odpravnina po pravilih agencijske pogodbe v primerjalnem pravu (Ljubljana: GV Založba).
Kerčmar, S., Odpravnina trgovskega zastopnika, in: Repas, M. (Ed.) (2024), Studia Iuridica Miscellanea MMXXI, p. 123-158.
McKendrick, E. (2006), Harmonisation of European Contract Law: The State We Are In, The Harmonisation of European Contract Law, p. 5–28.
Meier, P., Kommentar zu § 89b HGB, in: Küstner, W., Thume K. H. (2014), Handbuch des gesamten Vertriebsrechts, Band 2, Der Ausgleichsanspruch des Handelsvertreters, Warenvertreter, Versicherungs- und Bausparkassenvertreter (Frankfurt am Main: Fachmedien Recht und Wirtschaft).
Rot, P. (2016), Upravičenost do odpravnine ob prenehanju distribucijskega razmerja, Master's thesis (Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana).
Stabej, M. (2020), Pomenska interpretacija prvega odstavka 833. člena Obligacijskega zakonika, strokovno mnenje.
Zabel, B., Pogodba o trgovskem zastopanju (Agencijska pogodba), in: Plavšak, N, et al. (2004), Obligacijski zakonik (OZ) (posebni del) s komentarjem, 4. knjiga (Ljubljana: GV Založba), p. 399-534.
Zabel, B., Pogodba o trgovskem zastopanju (Agencijska pogodba), in: Plavšak, N. et al. (2021), E-paket Obligacije z e-komentarjem Obligacijskega zakonika (OZ). (Ljubljana: Tax-Fin-Lex).
Legal sources:
Bekendtgørelse af lov om aftaler og andre retshandler på formuerettens område of August 26, 1996, Act No. 781 with last amendments of December 15, 2015, Act No. 1565.
Bundesgesetz über die Rechtsverhältnisse der selbständigen Handelsvertreter of February 11, 1993, BGBl. Nr. 88/1993, with last amendments of June 2, 2016, BGBl. I Nr. 29/2016.
Civil Obligations Act Zakon o obveznim odnosima, Official Gazette, no. 35/05, 41/08, 125/11, 78/15, 29/18, 126/21, 114/22, 156/22, 155/23.
Code of Economic Law [Code de droit économique] of March 29, 2013, Moniteur belge no. 2013A11134.
Codice Civile, approved by Royal Decree of March 16,1942, No. 262, and as amended by Decree of December, 7, 2016, No. 291.
Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia [Ustava Republike Slovenije], Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia Nos.33/91-I, 42/97 – UZS68, 66/00 – UZ80, 24/03 – UZ3a, 47, 68, 69/04 – UZ14, 69/04 – UZ43, 69/04 – UZ50, 68/06 – UZ121,140,143, 47/13 – UZ148, 47/13 – UZ90,97,99, 75/16 – UZ70a in 92/21 – UZ62a.
Council Directive of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents, OJ L 382, 31.12.1986.
Evaluation of the Council Directive on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents (Directive 86/653/EEC)/REFIT Evaluation of 16 July 2015, Ref. Ares (2015)3019308.
Handelsgesetzbuch of May 10, BGBl. Nr. III. 4100-1, with last amendments of December 27, 2024, BGBl. 2024 I Nr. 438.
Lov om handelsagenter og handelsrejsende of May 2, 1990, Act no. 272.
Obligations Act Zakon o obligacijskih razmerjih, Official Gazette of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Nos. 29/78, 39/85, 45/89 – Constitutional Court decision, and 57/89.
Obligations Code [Obligacijski zakonik], Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia Nos. 97/07 – official consolidated text, 64/16 – Constitutional Court decision, and 20/18 – OROZ631.
Case law:
Judgement of Italian Supreme Court [Corte Suprema di Cassazione], No. 12127 of June 11, 2015.
Judgement of Italian Supreme Court [Corte Suprema di Cassazione], No. 17239 of August 22, 2016.
Judgement of Italian Supreme Court [Corte Suprema di Cassazione], No. 13796 of May 31, 2017.
Judgement of Ljubljana Higher Court, No. I Cpg 924/2016 of April 24, 2018.
Judgement of March 23, 2006, Honyvem Informazioni Commerciali Srl v Mariella De Zotti, C-465/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:199.
Judgement of March 16, 2006, Poseidon Chartering BV v Marianne Zeeschip VOF and Others, C-3/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:176.
Judgement of March 26, 2009, Turgay Semen v Deutsche Tamoil GmbH, C-348/07, ECLI:EU:C:2009:195.
Judgement of Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, No. II Ips 565/2000 of June 14, 2001.
Judgement of Ljubljana Higher Court, No. I Cpg 74/2024 of October 21, 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 University of Maribor, University Press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Univerza v Mariboru, Pravna fakulteta, Univerzitetna založba
Prosti pristop