Enforcement of Choice of Court Agreements Granting International Jurisdiction to Albanian Courts
Abstract
This paper aims to critically analyse the formal and substantive validity of choice of court agreements in favour of Albanian courts. The provisions of the Albanian Private International Law and their implementation by Albanian courts are in the focus. However, considering that the Albanian Private International Law provisions are approximated with the EU acquis communautaire and since the provisions on choice of courts agreements are drafted in terms that are fully compatible with the Council Regulation 44/2001 of December 22, 2000 "On Jurisdiction, Recognition and Implementation of Judicial Decisions in Civil Matters and Trade” (Brussels I Regulation), the interpretation of the Albanian law provisions is also done in the light of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. After a thorough analysis of the Albanian Private International Law provisions concerning choice of court agreements and of the Albanian case law, the paper concludes that they are not always interpreted and applied correctly and that the rich case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union can provide valuable guidance.
Povzetek
Namen tega prispevka je kritično analizirati formalno in vsebinsko veljavnost sporazumov o izbiri sodišča v korist albanskih sodišč. V ospredju so določbe albanskega mednarodnega zasebnega prava in njihovo izvajanje s strani albanskih sodišč. Ker pa so določbe albanskega mednarodnega zasebnega prava približane pravnemu redu EU in ker so določbe o sporazumih o izbiri sodišča oblikovane tako, da so v celoti skladne z Uredbo Sveta 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 „O pristojnosti, priznavanju in izvajanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah“ (Uredba Bruselj I), je razlaga določb albanskega prava opravljena tudi ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije. Po temeljiti analizi določb albanskega mednarodnega zasebnega prava o sporazumih o izbiri sodišča in albanske sodne prakse članek ugotavlja, da se te določbe ne razlagajo in uporabljajo vedno pravilno ter da lahko bogata sodna praksa Sodišča Evropske unije zagotovi dragocene smernice.
Downloads
References
Fawcett, J. (2001) Non-exclusive Jurisdiction Agreements in Private International Law, Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, p. 234-260.
Gutmann, D. (2009) Le droit international prive (Paris: Dalloz) translated in Albanian by Xhabija, E., and Nano, V. (2015) E drejta ndërkombëtare private (Tirana: Papirus).
Keyes, M. and Marshall, B. A. (2015) Jurisdiction agreements: exclusive, optional and asymmetrical, Journal of Private International Law, 11(3), p. 345-378, DOI: 10.1080/17441048.2015.1106718.
Keyes, M. (2020) Optional Choice of Court Agreements in Private International Law: General Report
in: M. Keyes (ed.), Optional Choice of Court Agreements in Private International Law, Ius Comparatum– Global Studies in Comparative Law, 37, (Springer Nature Switzerland AG), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23914-5_1.
Kola Tafaj, F. and Çinari, S. (2015) Zgjidhjet Alternative të Mosmarrëveshjeve (Tirana: Albas).
Kruger, Th. (2008) Civil jurisdiction rules of the EU and their impact on third states (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Magnus, U. (2016) in: Magnus, U., and Mankowski, P., Brussels Ibis Regulation, European Commentaries on Private International Law, Commentary, Volume I (Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt KG)
Ratković, T. and Zgrabljić Rotar, D., (2013) Choice-of-Court Agreements under the Brussels I Regulation (Recast), Journal of Private International Law, 9(2), p. 245-268, DOI: 10.5235/17441048.9.2.245.
Stone, P. (2014) EU private international law (Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing).
