Accepting EU Private International Law Standards into the Legal System of Bosnia and Herzegovina: What Can be Done While Waiting for Godot?
The process of accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the EU implies the introduction of EU standards on Private International Law into its internal legislation. This paper includes considerations related to the ways of implementation of the reform of private international law, having in mind the complex constitutional structure of Bosnia and Herzegovina, especially the division of competencies between the State and its entities. Bearing in mind the complexity of the decision-making process of different levels and the inability to reach political consensus on the reform, the article emphasises alternative mechanisms for introducing EU standards in the field of private international law into the legal system in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Given the external competence of the EU in its relations with third countries, this article gives a thorough analysis of the possibility of concluding international agreements in the field of private international law.
Alihodžić, J. (2015) The Hague Convention 2005 and Bosnia and Herzegovina, Anali Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Zenici, 9, pp. 109–111.
Basedow, J. (2015) Gegenseitigkeit im Kollisionrecht in: Hilbig-Lugani, K., (ed.) Zwischenbilanz – Festschrift für Dagmar Coester-Waltjen, Gieseking, Bielefeld, pp. 335–349.
Basedow, J. (2017) EU-Kollisionrecht und Haager Konferenz – Ein schweriges Verhältnis, IPRax, 37(2), pp. 194–200.
Brand, R. (2005) The European Union's New Role in International Private Litigation, Loyola University Chicago International Law Review, 2(2), pp. 277–293.
Brand, R. (2015) The 2005 Hague Choice of Court Convention in the United States, Anali Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Zenici, 9(18), pp. 31–45.
Dieter, M. (2015) Die Haager Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts Eine weitere Verankerung der Parteiautonomie, RabelsZ, 79(3), pp. 624–653.
Kruger, T. (2006), Opinion 1/03, ‘Competence of the Community to Conclude the New Lugano Convention on the Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Columbia Journal of European Law, 13(1), pp. 189–201.
Mansel, H.P., Thorn, R., Wagner, R. (2014), Europäisches Kollisionrecht 2013: Atempause im status que, IPRax, Heft 1, pp. 1–27.
Meškić, Z. (2016) Regional Convention on Jurisdiction and the Mutual Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil And Commercial Matters (Sarajevo Convention) – A Perspective of Bosnia And Herzegovina, in Liber Amicorum Gaša Knežević, Belgrade, pp. 242–267.
Meškić, Z., Radončić, Dž. (2013), Brussels I recast and the south-east Europe, Revija za evropsko pravo, 15(1), pp. 55–80.
Muminović, E. (1998) O uzajamnom odnosu načela najuže veze, autonomije volje i favorabilnosti mjerodavnog prava u vezi s potrebom zakonodavnog djelovanja države Bosne i Hercegovine u materiji međunarodnog privatnog prava, Godišnjak Pravnog fakulteta u Sarajevu, 41, pp. 234–245.
Schulz, A. (2007) The Accession of the European Community to the Hague Conference on Private International Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56(4), pp. 939–949.
Stanivuković, M. (2010), Umjesto zaključka-o potrebi pristupanja Luganskoj konvenciji, Collected Papers from the VIIth Private International Law Conference-Enlargement of the European Judicial Area to CEFTA Countries, Novi Sad, pp.100–127.
V. Loon, H. (2015) The 2005 Hague Convention on the Choice of Court Agreements – An Introduction, Anali Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Zenici, 9, pp. 11–31.
© University of Maribor, Faculty of Law, University Press
Free to Read