Abolition of Exequatur in Brussels Ia Regulation – New Challenges for the National Judge (Croatia)

  • Paula Poretti University of Osijek, Faculty of Law J.J. Strossmayer, S. Radića 17, HR-31 000 Osijek
Keywords: exequatur, abolition, Brussels Ia Regulation, adaptation, measure, order, recognition, enforcement, execution, judgment

Abstract

This article will analyse and evaluate if and to what extent enforcement of judgments according to the Brussels Ia Regulation may be challenging for Croatian judges. It seeks to answer the questions a) which novelties in terms of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are introduced through the system of cross-border enforcement of judgments under Brussels Ia and b) with regard to the lack of implementation provisions in Croatian legal system, how will a new “adaptation device” according to Art. 54 of the Brussels operate. In particular, how and by whom will the adaptation of measure or order be carried out and how will it be challenged pursuant to Art. 54 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation. In a
search for possible answers, approaches as well as solutions adopted in the legal systems of some Member States will also be taken into account. Considerations which can be attributed to the lack of
provisions regarding implementation of the Brussels Ia Regulation in Croatian legal system will be highlighted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adolphsen, J. (2014) Europäisches Zivilverfahrensrecsht (Gießen, DE: Springer).

Dickinson, A. (2011) The Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Recast) (“Brussels I bis” Regulation), Sydney Law School Legal Study Research Paper, no.11/58, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1930712 (June 22, 2016).

Dickinson, A. & Lein, E. (eds.) (2015) The Brussels I Regulation Recast (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Linton, M. (2016) Abolition of Exequatur, All in the Name of Mutual Trust!, In: Hess B., Bergström M. & Storskrubb, E. (eds.) EU Civil Justice, Current Issues and Future Outlook, pp. 257-282 (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing).

Meškić, Z. &. Radončić, Dž. (2013) .Brussels I recast and the South East Europe, Revija za

evropsko pravo, 15(1), pp. 51-75.

Oberhammer, P. (2010) The Abolition of Exequatur,” IPRax, 30, pp. 197-199.

Schramm, D. (2013/2014) Enforcement and the Abolition of Exequatur under the 2012 Brussels I Regulation, Yearbook of Private International Law, 15, pp. 143-174.

Sladic, J. (2013) The remedies and recourses in European civil procedure after the intended abolition of the exequatur, Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 3, pp. 329-358.

Vuković, Đ. & Kunštek E. (2005) Međunarodno građansko postupovno pravo (Zagreb: Zgombić i partneri).

Triva, S. & Dika, M. (2004) Građansko parnično procesno parvo (Zagreb: Narodne novine).

Published
2017-09-15
How to Cite
Poretti P. (2017). Abolition of Exequatur in Brussels Ia Regulation – New Challenges for the National Judge (Croatia). LeXonomica, 8(1), 13-28. Retrieved from https://journals.um.si/index.php/lexonomica/article/view/18557147.8.13-28%282016%29
Section
Articles