Relationship of the Brussels I Regulation vis-à-vis Legal Remedies Provided by National Enforcement Laws

  • Damjan Orož Ljubljana Higher Court
Keywords: enforcement in the Member State of enforcement, foreign judgment, application for refusal of enforceability, objection against the enforcement order, creditor

Abstract

Article discuss the impact of the Brussels I and Brussels I bis Regulations on Slovenian enforcement proceedings. The aim of the Brussels I bis Regulation is to ensure creditors a simpler but mostly quicker access to enforcement in case a judgment must be enforced in a state other than the Member State of origin. The new regulatory framework will certainly facilitate quicker access to enforcement for creditors. However, this can only be ensured categorically in the first phase of enforcement, i.e. the seizure of assets (distraint). In subsequent enforcement phases successful enforcement in favour of the creditor could be stayed if the debtor decides to enforce grounds used to challenge the enforceability of a foreign judgment. A major distinction is that the control of enforceability will only proceed if and when the debtor so requests.

 

Razmerje med Uredbo Bruselj I in pravnimi sredstvi, ki jih predvidevajo nacionalne ureditve izvršilnega prava

 

Prispevek obravnava vpliv Uredb BU I in BU I bis na slovenski izvršilni postopek. Namen BU I bis je upniku zagotoviti lažji, predvsem pa hitrejši dostop do izvršbe v primeru, da je treba sodbo izvršiti v drugi državi kot v državi izvora. Gotovo bo nova ureditev upniku zagotovila hitrejši dostop do izvršbe, vendar to lahko kategorično zagotovimo le za prvo fazo izvršbe, to je rubež premoženja. V kasnejših fazah izvršitve pa se utegne upniku uspešna izvršba odložiti, če se dolžnik odloči uveljavljati razloge, s katerimi bo nasprotoval izvršljivosti tuje sodne odločbe. Pomembna razlika je ta, da se bo kontrola izvršljivosti opravila le ko in če bo dolžnik to zahteval.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Damjan Orož, Ljubljana Higher Court
Senior judge of the Ljubljana Higher Court, Tavčarjeva 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia, e-mail: damjan.oroz@gmail.com.

References

Ekart, A. and Rijavec, V. (2010), »Čezmejna izvršba v EU: osrednja tema evropskega civilnega procesnega prava« (Ljubljana: GV Založba).

Rauscher, T., Lieble, S., Mankowski, P., Pabst, S., Staudinger, A. (2016) Europäisches Zivilprozess- und Kollisinsrescht, Brüsel Ia-VO (Ottoschmidt: Köln).

Ekart, A. (2018), in Repas, M., Rijavec, V. »Mednarodno zasebno pravo Evropske unije« (Ljubljana: Uradni list Republike Slovenije).

Rijavec, V. (2006) »Izvršilni naslov (po BU I, UEIN in slovenskem pravu)«; Evropsko procesno pravo v drugem letu članstva Slovenije v EU (Ljubljana: Nebra).

Sladič, J. (2016) »Sistem ugovorov v Uredbi Bruselj Ia«, material for the Seminar for lawyers and attorneys on European procedural law: Introduction to Brussels Ia Regulation, Ljubljana, 3 June 2016.

Schlosser, P., Hess, B. (2015) EuZPR, EU-Zivilprozessrecht mit EuGVVO, EuMahnVO, EuBagVO, EuZVO, EuBVO, Kommentar, (München: C.H.Beck).

Wolf, C. (2016) »German Understanding of Abolition of Exequatur«, Corporate Entities at the Market in the European Dimension, Portorož, 20 May; https://www.pf.um.si/site/assets/files/3545/prof__dr__christian_wolf_leibniz_university_of_hannover_germany.pdf.

Zöller, R. (2014) Zivilprozessordnung: mit FamFG ([Paragraphen] 1–185, 200–270, 433–484) und Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz, den Einführungsgesetzen, mit internationalem Zivilprozessrecht, EG-Verordnungen, Kostenanmerkungen : Kommentar / begründet von Richard Zöller ; bearbeitet von Reinhold Geimer ... [et al.]. (Köln: O. Schmidt).

Nunner–Krautgasser, B. (2016) »Characteristics of Austrian Remedies against Enforcement and a General Analysis of their Suitability for Achieving the Objectives of Brussels I Recast«, LeXonomica – Journal of Law and Economics, 8(2), pp. 1–12.

Published
2018-12-26
How to Cite
Orož D. (2018). Relationship of the Brussels I Regulation vis-à-vis Legal Remedies Provided by National Enforcement Laws. LeXonomica, 10(2), 149-160. Retrieved from https://journals.um.si/index.php/lexonomica/article/view/126
Section
Articles