Učinkovitost Uredbe o postopkih v sporih majhne vrednosti in analiza predvidenih novosti po predlogu o spremembi uredbe

  • Tjaša Ivanc University of Maribor, Faculty of Law
Keywords: civil procedure law, European law, European small claims procedure, civil matters, Regulation (EC) No. 861/2007, proposal for amendments of the Regulation (EC) No. 861/2007, comparative law

Abstract

The effectiveness of the regulation establishing a European small claims procedure and the analysis of foreseen novelties under the proposal for amendments of the regulation. This paper deals with a European small claims procedure, which was the first to introduce the adversarial principle with the objective to simplify and speed up the settlement of disputes with cross-border elements and to reduce costs. European small claims procedure is an alternative proceeding, which allows customers to opt for either procedure under the national laws of the Member States or supranational procedures. This is a European instrument that allows mutual recognition of judgments in civil matters and enforcement of judgments in the Member States with the exclusion of the exequatur. Regulation no. 861/2007 on the procedure for Small Claims provides written procedure on the basis of standard forms promotes the use of modern communication technologies and lays down minimum standards for the protection of procedural rights. Despite the advantages, there are courts in the Member States which are hardly aware of this procedure. The author presents normative and empirical aspects of the Regulation no. 861/2007 and highlights current weaknesses, which are the reason that the use of this transnational procedure in practice did not come to life as expected after the regulation was adopted.

Povzetek. Ta prispevek obravnava evropski postopek v sporu majhne vrednosti, ki je prvi uvedel kontradiktorni postopek, s ciljem poenostavitve in pospešitve reševanja sporov s čezmejnim elementom in znižanjem stroškov. Evropski postopek majhne vrednosti je alternativni postopek, kar omogoča strankam, da se odločijo bodisi za postopek na podlagi zakonov držav članic ali za nadnacionalni postopek. Gre za evropski instrument, ki omogoča medsebojno priznanje sodnih odločb v civilnih zadevah in izvršitev sodnih odločb v državah članicah z izključitvijo eksekvature. Uredba št. 861/2007 o postopkih v sporih majhne vrednosti predvideva pisen postopek na podlagi standardnih obrazcev, pospešuje uporabo modernih komunikacijskih tehnologij in določa minimalne procesne standarde za varstvo pravic. Kljub prednostim pa so sodišča s tem postopkom v državah članicah slabo seznanjena. Avtorica predstavi normativni in empirični vidik Uredbe št. 861/2007 ter izpostavi trenutne slabosti, zaradi katerih uporaba tega nadnacionalnega postopka v praksi ni zaživela, kot je bilo pričakovano ob njenem sprejetju.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tjaša Ivanc, University of Maribor, Faculty of Law

PhD. Assistant Professor, Maribor, Slovenia. E-mail: tjasa.ivanc@um.si.

References

Caramelo-Gomes, J. (2010) Principles of National Procedural Law in Summary Procedures and the Principles of Effectiveness of the European Law (LeXonomica), Let. II, št. 2, str. 145–160.

Ekart, A., Rijavec. V. (2010): Čezmejna izvršba v EU:osrednja tema evropskega civilnega procesnega prava (Ljubljana: GV).

Galič, A., Betetto, N. (2011) Evropsko civilno procesno pravo (Ljubljana: GV založba).

Hau, W. (2013) Europski postupak za tražbine male vrijednosti v Garašić, J., Europsko građansko procesno pravo – izbrane teme (Zagreb: Narodne novine).

Hau, W. (2013) Experience of German and Austrian courts and legal practice in applying the European Small Claims Procedure, Conference proceedings "European Small Claims Procedure – How civil law instruments serve the interests of EU citizens", Vilnius, Lithuania: [http://www.eu2013.lt/en/events/political-meetings/conferencesandseminars/conferenceeuropean-small-claims-procedurehow-civil-law-instruments-serve-the-interests-of-eu-citizens] (obiskano 28.5.2014).

Hess B. (2010) Europäisches Zivilprozessrecht (Heidelberg: C.F. Müller).

Hess B. (2012) Procedural Harmonisation in a European Context, v Kramer, X. E. (ur.), van Rhee, C. H. (ur.), Civil Litigation in a Globalasing World (Haag: Springer).

Hess, B., Pfeiffer, T., Schlosser, P. (2007) Report on the Application of Brussels I Regulation in the Member States, (“The Heidelberg Report”), (Study JLS/C4/2005/03), [http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/news/docs/study_application_brussels_1_en.pdf] (obiskano: 28.5.2014).

Jelinek, W. (2009) Das Europäische Bagatellverfahren aus österreichischer Sicht, v König, B., Mayr, P.G., Europäisches Zivilverfahrensrecht in Österreich II (Wien: Manz).

Keresteš, T. (2005) Evropski izvršilni naslov, Podjetje in delo, 31(6-7), str. 1162–1174.

Kramer, X., K. (2008) A Major Step in the Harmonization of Procedural Law in Europe: The European Small Claims Procedure Accomplishments, New Features and Some Fundamental Questions of European Harmonization [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1120742 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1120742] (obiskano: 28.5.2014).

Nunner-Krautgasser, B., Anzenberger, F. (2012) General principles in European Small Claims Procedure – How far can Simplifications go? (LeXonomica), IV(2), str. 133–146.

Ontanu, E.A., Pannebakker,E. (2013) Tackling Language Obstacles in Cross-Border Litigation: The European Order for Payment and the European Small Claims Procedure Approach (Erasmus Law Review), Vol. 5, No. 3, 2013 [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2212081] (obiskano: 28.5.2014).

Rijavec, V. (2009) v Ude, L. (ur.), Galič, A. (ur.), Pravdni postopek : zakon s komentarjem (Ljubljana: GV založba).

van Rhee, C.H. (2012) Harmonisation of Civil procedure: An Historical and Comparative Perspective, v Kramer, X. E. (ur.), van Rhee, C.H. (ur.), Civil Litigation in a Globalising World (Haag: Springer).

Zangl, S. (2010) Die Verordnungen (EG) Nr. 805/2004, (EG) Nr. 1896/2006 und (EG) Nr. 861/2007 und deren Umsetzung in das österreichische Recht, (LeXonomica), II(2), str. 199–221.

Evropska komisija, Deloitte (2013), Assessment of the socio-economic impacts of the policy options for the future of the European Small Claims Regulation, No. RTD-L05-2010, Final Report (Belgium), [http://ec.europa.eu/justice/civil/files/small_claims_report_ia_en.pdf]

Commission staff working document: Extended Impact Assessment on a Proposal for a Community Small Claims Instrument, COM(2005)87 final, 15.3.2005, str.12: http://ec.europa.eu/smartregulation/impact/ia_carried_out/docs/ia_2005/sec_2005_0351_en.pdf.

Evropska komisija (2013) Eurobarometer 395 »European Small Claims Procedure Report [http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_395_en.pdf],

ECC-Net, Small Claims Procedure Report (2012): http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/ecc/docs/small_claims_210992012_en.pdf; študija Eurobarometer 395 »European Small Claims Procedure Report (2013): http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_395_en.pdf.

Evropska komisija (2005) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (Bruselj) [http://euzpr.eu/eudocs/01prozessr/10zivilhandelsr/40egbagatellvo/egbagatellvo-115-rat_15054-05_en.pdf].

Published
2021-02-04
How to Cite
Ivanc T. (2021). Učinkovitost Uredbe o postopkih v sporih majhne vrednosti in analiza predvidenih novosti po predlogu o spremembi uredbe. LeXonomica, 6(1), 49-72. Retrieved from https://journals.um.si/index.php/lexonomica/article/view/1062
Section
Articles