Some observations regarding cross-border debt collection in consumer disputes

  • Christophe Verdure University of Saint-Louis (Louvain Academy)
Keywords: cross-border debt collection, online mediation, consumer law, alternative litigation proceedings, Directive 2008/52/EC, private international law

Abstract

Cross-border debt collection in consumer dispute leads to many difficulties. The main one is the access to justice as consumers are generally not aware of their rights and legal proceedings may be expensive. The major difficulty in order to sue a counterpart based in another Member States is the determination of the competent court. However, this private international law issue is the first step in order to bring a legal action. This action may be disproportionate, on time and value, in comparison with the amount of the debt a consumer wants to recover. As a result, the European Commission has adopted the Directive 2008/52/EC on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters which aims at facilitating cross-border disputes involving consumers. After recalling the main characteristics of the Directive, author also discusses online mediation, that can also lead to more effective results.

Nekateri vidiki čezmejnega uveljavljanja terjatev v potrošniških sporih. Čezmejno uveljavljanje terjatev v potrošniških sporih povzroča veliko težav. Glavno težavo predstavlja dostop do pravnega varstva, saj se potrošniki v splošnem ne zavedajo svojih pravic in pravni postopki so lahko dragi. Največja težava pri vlaganju tožbe zoper nasprotno stranko s sedežem v drugi državi članici je določitev pristojnega sodišča. Vendar pa je ta težava mednarodnega zasebnega prava šele prvi korak pri vlaganju tožbe. To dejanje je lahko nesorazmerno glede na čas in vrednost v primerjavi z višino terjatve, ki jo potrošnik želi izterjati. Kot rezultat tega je bila na ravni EU sprejeta Direktiva 2008/52/ES o nekaterih vidikih mediacije v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, katere namen je olajšati čezmejne spore, v katere so vključeni potrošniki. Po pregledu glavnih značilnosti omenjene direktive avtor izpostavlja še t. i. internetno mediacijo kot različico mediacije, ki lahko prav tako vodi do učinkovitejših rezultatov.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Christophe Verdure, University of Saint-Louis (Louvain Academy)

Researcher, Brussles, Belgium. E-mail: verdure@fusl.ac.be.

References

Aubry, H., Poilot, E., Sauphanor-Brouillaud, N. (2010) Droit de la consommation – janvier 2009 – janvier 2010, Recueil Dalloz, No 13.

Blanke, G. (2008) The Mediation Directive : What will it Mean for Us?, 74 Arbitration.

Bombois, T., Renson, P.-P. (2009) La directive du 21 mai 2008 ‘sur certains aspects de la médiation en matière civile et commerciale’ et sa transposition en droit belge, European Journal of Consumer Law, vol. 2–3.

Boularbah, H., Nuyts, A., Watté, N. (2002) Le règlement ‘Bruxelles I’ sur la compétence judiciaire, la reconnaissance et l’exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale, J.T.D.E..

Busseuil, G. (2009) La nouvelle directive Timeshare: une première étape dans la révision de l’acquis communautaire en droit des contrats, European Journal of Consumer Law, 2–3.

Calais-Auloy, J. (2006) La notion de consommateur en droit français et en droit communautaire in L. Thévenoz & N. Reich (dir.), Liber Amicorum Bernd Stauder, Genève, Schulthess.

Chamoulaud-Trapiers, A. (2007) Droit des affaires, coll. Lexifac Droit, 2nd ed., Paris, Bréal.

Cole, S. (2006) Online Mediation: Where We Have Been, Where We Are Now, And Where We Should Be, 38 University of Toledo Law Review.

Crawford, E. (2009) Case Ilsinger v. Dreschers: The right, for consumers, to seek payment of the prize thery apparently won, European Journal of Consumer Law, vol. 4.

Cruyplants, J. Gonda, M, Wagemans, M. (2008) Droit et pratique de la médiation, Brussels, Bruylant, pp. 3 à 5, nos 10 à 13.

Dickie, J. (1999) Internet and electronic commerce law in the European Union, Oxford, Hart Publishing.

Diéguez, J. (2008) Mandatory Online Mediation for European Consumers: Legal Constraints and Policy Issues, Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal.

Diéguez, J. (2008) Mandatory Online Mediation for European Consumers: Legal Constraints and Policy Issues, Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal.

European Commission calls for saving time and money in cross-border legal disputes through mediation, IP/10/1060, 20 August 2010.

Gaudemet-Tallon, H. (2002) Compétence et exécution des jugements en Europe, 3ème éd., Paris, L.G.D.J..

Gilles, L. (2003) Adapting international private law rules for electronic consumer contracts in Rickett, C., Telfer, T. (ed.) (2003) International perspectives on consumers’ access to justice, Cambridge University Press.

Howells, G. (2009) The Future for the Proposed Consumer Rights Directive, European Journal of Consumer Law, vol. 4.

Idot, L. (2009) Compétence en matière de contrats conclus par les consommateurs, Europe, No 2009/7, comment No 290.

Krämer, L. (1988) La CEE et la protection du consommateur, coll. Droit et consommation, vol. XV, Brussels, Story-Scientia.

Mahieu, S. (2007) Le droit de la société de l’alimentation – Vers un nouveau modèle de maîtrise des risques alimentaires et technologiques en droit communautaire et international, Brussels, Larcier.

Mahieu, S., Van Huffel, M. (2009) Consommation – Alimentation (1er octobre 2007 – 31 octobre 2008), Journal de Droit européen, 2009.

Mahieu, S., Van Huffel, M. (2010) Consommation – Alimentation (1er novembre 2008 – 31 octobre 2009), Journal de Droit européen, 2010.

Micklitz, H. (2009) The targeted full harmonisation approach : Looking behind the curtain” in G. Howells & R. Schulze (eds.), Modernising and Harmonising Consumer Contract Law, Munich, Sellier.

Micklitz, H., Reich, N. (2009) Crònica de una muerte anunciada : The Commission proposal for a ‘Directive on consumer rights’, Common Market Law Review, vol. 2.

Nadja, A. (2006) Fall 2005 Dispute Resolution Institute Symposium: Mobile Mediation: How Technology is Driving the Globalization of ADR, 27 Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy.

Nuyts, A. (2001) La communautarisation de la Convention de Brussels – Le règlement 44/2001 sur la compétence judiciaire et l’effet des décisions en matière civile et commerciale, J.T.

Rinkes, J. (2008) European Consumer Law: Making Sense, The Yearbook of Consumer Law. Solovay, N., Reed, R. (2003) The Internet and dispute resolution : untangling the Web, New-York, Law Journal Press, No 3–24.

Tichadou, E. (2009) La jurisprudence récente de la CJCE dans les affaires concernant less consommateurs, ERA Forum 2009/1.

Verbiest, T., Wéry, E. (2001) Le droit de l’internet et de la société de l’information, Brussels, Larcier, No 954.

Verdure, C. (2008) La protection des consommateurs au regard de l’art. 15 du Règlement (CE) No 44/2001”, note sous Anvers (5ème ch.), 20 mars 2007, Annuaire juridique du crédit et du règlement collectif de dettes.

Verdure, C. (2010) Chronique de jurisprudence en droit de la consommation (1er août 2008 – 31 juillet 2009), ERA Forum, 2010/1.

Watté, N., Nuyts, A., Boularbah, H. (2006) Droit international privé européen, J.T.D.E.

Published
2021-01-28
How to Cite
Verdure C. (2021). Some observations regarding cross-border debt collection in consumer disputes. LeXonomica, 2(2), 237-256. Retrieved from https://journals.um.si/index.php/lexonomica/article/view/1046
Section
Articles