Provisional Security of Creditors in Cross-border Civil and Commercial Matters
Abstract
Provisional measures can be of utmost importance to creditors especially in relationships with a cross-border element. The Regulation 1215/2012 is the legal source that provides rules regarding the jurisdiction to issue a provisional measure but also offers imperfect provisions regarding the recognition and enforcement of foreign provisional measures issued in other Member States of the European Union. Due to the inadequate regulation, CJEU case law has played an important role, but nevertheless the article finds and opens new questions that have not yet been answered.
Downloads
References
Dickinson, A., Lein, E. (2015) The Brussels I Regulation Recast (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Geimer, R., Schütze, R. A. (2010) Europäisches Zivilverfahrensrecht, Kommentar (München: Verlag C. H. Beck).
Heinze, C. (2011) Choice of Court Agreements, Coordination of proceedings and Provisional Measures in the Reform of the Brussels I Regulation, Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht (RabelsZ), 75(3), pp. 581–618.
König, B. (2012) Einstweilige Verfügungen im Zivilverfahren (Wien: MANZ).
Kramer, X. E. (2013) Cross-border enforcement and the Brussels I-bis Regulation: towards a new balance between mutual trust and national control over fundamental rights, Netherlands International Law Review, 60(3), pp. 343–373.
Kunštek, E., Puljko, V. (2013) Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Temporary Measures, JURA – A Pécsi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Karának tudományos lapja, 1(1), pp. 51–62.
Magnus, U., Mankowski, P. (2016) European Commentaries on Private International Law, Commentary, Vol. 1. (Cologne: Selp, Verlag dr. Otto Schmidt KG).
Pogorelčnik Vogrinc, N. (2019) Izdaja in izvršitev evropskega naloga za zamrznitev bančnih računov, Liber amicorum Dragica Wedam Lukić, pp. 267–280 (Ljubljana: Pravna fakulteta).
Pogorelčnik Vogrinc, N. (2017) Evropski nalog za zamrznitev bančnih računov, In Razsežnosti zasebnega prava: liber amicorum Ada Polajnar Pavčnik, pp. 319–334 (Ljubljana: Pravna fakulteta).
Pretelli, I. (2017) Provisional and Protective Measures in the European Civil Procedure of the Brussels I System, In Brussels I bis Regulation, pp. 97–117 (The Hague: Springer).
Rauscher, T. (2011) Europäisches Zivilprozess- und Kollisionrecht EuZPR/EuIPR: Kommentar (München: Sellier).
Rauscher, T. (2016) Europäisches Zivilprozess- und Kollisionrecht EuZPR/EuIPR: Kommentar, Band I (Cologne: Dr. Otto Scmidt Verlag KG).
Report on the Application of Regulation Brussels I in the Member States (the Heidelberg Report), Study JLS/C4/2005/03. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/news/docs/study_application_brussels_1_en.pdf (accessed: 24. 2. 2016).
Rijavec, V. in Rijavec, V., Repas, M. (2018) Mednarodno zasebno pravo Evropske unije (Ljubljana: Uradni list).
Schlosser, P., Hess, B. (2015) EU-Zivilprozessrecht: EuGVVO, EuVTVO, EuMahnVO, EuBagVO, HZÜ, EuZVO, HBÜ, EuBVO, EuKtPV: Kommentar (München: C. H. Beck).
Sladič, J. (2018) Ukrepi zavarovanja v evropskem civilnem pravu, začasne odredbe z mednarodnim elementom, Pravosodni bilten, 1, pp. 75–102.
Stone, P. (2016) EU Private International Law (Northampton: E. Elgar).
Wilke, F. M. (2015) The impact of the Brussels I Recast on important ʻBrusselsʼ case law, Journal of Private International Law, 11(1), pp. 128–142.