Operational and thermodynamic methodology for integrating a gas–steam cycle into a legacy coal-fired power block
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18690/jet.18.4.%25p.2025Keywords:
natural gas, power, recovery, steam, turbineAbstract
This paper investigates the thermodynamic integration of a gas–steam combined cycle into an existing coal-fired power block with the objective of reducing coal utilisation and associated emissions. In the baseline configuration, the legacy unit relies entirely on pulverised coal combustion, whereas the retrofit concept introduces a natural gas-fired gas turbine with heat recovery steam generation. The recovered exhaust heat is used to supplement steam production for the existing steam turbine train, thereby increasing the overall cycle efficiency and enabling partial fuel substitution. From an ecological perspective, natural gas presents a significantly lower carbon emission factor compared to coal, resulting in a proportional reduction of CO₂ and other greenhouse gas emissions at the system level. Additional benefits include lower NOₓ formation due to cleaner combustion and improved operational flexibility, enabling more efficient load following under variable renewable penetration. The results suggest that such hybridisation offers a viable decarbonisation pathway for thermal assets by leveraging the existing infrastructure while achieving meaningful reductions in specific emissions.
Downloads
References
[1] Strušnik D., Avsec J., (2022). Exergoeconomic machine-learning method of integrating a thermochemical Cu–Cl cycle in a multigeneration combined cycle gas turbine for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 47., Iss. 39, pp 17121-17149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.230
[2] Strušnik D., Avsec J., (2022) Exergoeconomic machine-learning method of integrating a thermochemical CueCl cycle in a multigeneration combined cycle gas turbine for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 47, Iss. 39, pp 17121-17149.
[3] Strušnik D., Marčič M., Golob M., Hribernik A., Živić M., Avsec J., (2016). Energy efficiency analysis of steam ejector and electric vacuum pump for a turbine condenser air extraction system based on supervised machine learning modelling. Applied Energy, Vol. 173, pp 386-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.047.
[4] Strušnik D., (2021). Integration of machine learning to increase steam turbine condenser vacuum and efficiency through gasket resealing and higher heat extraction into the atmosphere. International Journal of Energy Research https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7375.
[5] Siemens Energy. SGT-800 gas turbine. https://www.siemens-energy.com.
[6] Strušnik D., Avsec.J., (2022). Energo economics paybeck investment calculation modelling og gas steam combined cycle power plant. Journal of energy technology, Vol. 15, Iss. 4, pp 11-28. https://www.dlib.si/stream/URN:NBN:SI:DOC-82E8QCOH/1e34bffc-2b36-4053-b2d5- 8f3193d9e389/PDF.
[7] Abbaspour G., Ghaebi H., Ziapour B. M., Javani N., (2025). Comprehensive thermoeconomic analysis of a novel solar based multigeneration system by incorporating of S–CO2 Brayton, HRSG and Cu–Cl cycles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 122, pp 192-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.294.
[8] Sasmoko, Bekti A. F., Cheng P., Chen C., Tseng C., (2025). Energy and exergy analyses of protonic ceramic fuel cell/gas turbine/organic Rankine cycle hybrid systems with methanol and230 JOURNAL OF ENERGY TECHNOLOGY Vol. 18, No. 4, December 2025 octane steam reformers. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 137, pp 948-960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.325.
[9] Li K., Zhang S., (2025). Novel selective exhaust gas recirculation strategy for part-load performance of a gas turbine combined cycle with MEA-based CO2 capture. Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 346, pp 120439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120439.
[10] Vescovi G., Alpy N., Haubensack D., Azzaro-Pantel C., Stouffs P., (2025). Optimizing the flexibility of the steam Rankine cycle of an SMR for load following and cogeneration by combining a double partial arc admission for the turbine. Energy, Vol. 339, p 139068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.139068.
[11] O’Brien S., Qureshi Z. U. A., Aghamolaei R., (2025). Comparative life cycle assessment of district heating supply pathways: Insights from waste heat and CHP configurations. Results in Engineering, Vol. 28, p 107718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107718.
[12] Mehrgoo M., Amidpour M., (2025). A constructal theory framework for optimizing HRSG design: Enhancing thermal performance and cost-effectiveness. Results in Engineering, Vol. 27, p 105849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105849.
[13] Ahmadi G., Jahangiri A., Toghraie D., (2023). Design of heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) and selection of gas turbine based on energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergo-environmental prospects. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 172, pp 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.02.025.
[14] SCADA system-TE-TOL Ljubljana.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 University of Maribor, University of Maribor Press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.