The psychometric properties of the Slovenian version of the Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture
Psihometrične lastnosti slovenske različice lestvice MOSOPCS za ocenjevanje kulture varnosti
Povzetek
Namen: Varnost pacientov na primarni ravni zdravstvenega varstva se močno razlikuje od varnosti pacientov na sekundarni ali terciarni ravni. Namen študije je bil preizkusiti veljavnost in zanesljivost slovenske različice vprašalnika o kulturi varnosti pacientov (MOSOPSC) v primarnih zdravstvenih ustanovah.
Metode: Opisana študija je bila presečna študija v največjem zdravstvenem domu v Sloveniji – Zdravstvenem domu Ljubljana. Vse delavce z vodilno funkcijo (N = 221) smo povabili k sodelovanju v elektronski študiji in uporabili slovensko različico MOSOPSC. Izvedli smo analizo potrditvenega faktorja (CFA) MOSOPSC. Za določitev zanesljivosti smo izračunali ICC za notranjo skladnost. Uporabili smo tudi metodologijo deljive polovice (formula Spearman-Brown) in izračunali Pearsonov koeficient za zanesljivost preizkusa.
Rezultati: Končni vzorec je vseboval 154 udeležencev (69,7 % odzivnost), od tega 136 (88,3 %) žensk. Povprečna starost vzorca je bila 46,2 ± 10,0 let. Model CFA je pokazal dobro prileganje. Notranja konsistenca MOSOPSC je bila dobra ali zelo dobra, Cronbachov alfa pa je znašal od 0,55 do 0,90. Pearsonov koeficient časovne stabilnosti se je gibal med 0,540 in 0,712. Zanesljivost po formuli Spearman-Brown je bila dobra.
Zaključek: Izsledki študije kažejo, da bi lahko bila slovenska različica MOSOPSC z izvirnimi faktorji zanesljivo in veljavno orodje za merjenje kulture varnosti med zaposlenimi v osnovnem zdravstvu.
Prenosi
Literatura
Vincent C, Burnett S, Carthey J. The measurement and monitoring of safety. London: Imperial College London; 2013.
Richter JP, McAlearney AS, Pennell ML. The influence of organizational factors on patient safety: Examining successful handoffs in health care. Health Care Manage Rev. 2016;41(1):32-41.
Deilkas ET. Patient safety culture - opportunities and viewpoints of family medicine physicians on approaches to identify and treat medically unexplained symptoms. Acta Medico-Biotechnica. 2016;9(2):47-57.
Parker D, Wensing M, Esmail A, Valderas JM. Measurement tools and process indicators of patient safety culture in primary care. A mixed methods study by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015;21 Suppl:26-30.
Sorra JS, Franklin M, Streagle S. Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.
Hickner J, Smith SA, Yount N, Sorra J. Differing perceptions of safety culture across job roles in the ambulatory setting: analysis of the AHRQ Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture. BMJ quality & safety. 2015;25(8):588-94.
Klemenc-Ketis Z, Svab I, Poplas Susic A. Implementing Quality Indicators for Diabetes and Hypertension in Family Medicine in Slovenia. Zdr Varst. 2017;56(4):211-9.
Petek D, Mlakar M. Quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in ‘model practices’ in slovenia – first results. Zdr Varst. 2016;55(3):179-84.
Zelko E, Svab I. Overcoming cultural cleavages: results from a health promotion intervention among Roma. Acta Medico-Biotechnica. 2016;9(1):33-41.
Pavlic DR, Sever M, Klemenc-Ketis Z, Svab I. Process quality indicators in family medicine: results of an international comparison. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):172.
Klemenc-Ketis Z, Deilkas ET, Hofoss D, Bondevik GT. Patient Safety Culture in Slovenian out-of-hours Primary Care Clinics. Zdr Varst. 2017;56(4):203-10.
Klemenc-Ketis Z, Maletic M, Stropnik V, Deilkăs ET, Hoffos D, Bondevik GT. The safety attitudes questionnaire – ambulatory version: psychometric properties of the Slovenian version for the out-ofhours primary care setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:36.
Klemenc-Ketis Z, Deilkas ET, Hofoss D, Bondevik GT. Variations in patient safety climate and perceived quality of collaboration between professions in out-of-hours care. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10:417-23.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.
Jackson DL, Gillaspy JA, Purc-Stephenson R. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2009;14(1):6-23.
Timothy BA. Confirmatory factor analysis. Boston University; 2013.
Ornelas MD, Pais D, Sousa P. Patient Safety Culture in Portuguese Primary Healthcare. Qual Prim Care. 2016;24(5):214-8.
Timm M, Soares Rodrigues MC. Cross-cultural adaptation of safety culture tool for Primary Health Care. Acta Paul Enfem. 2016;29(1):26-37.
Silvestre-Busto C, Torijano-Casalengua ML, Olivera-Canadas G, Astier-Pena MP, Maderuelo-Fernandez JA, Rubio-Aguado EA. Adaptation of the Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPSC) tool. Revista de calidad asistencial : organo de la Sociedad Espanola de Calidad Asistencial. 2015;30(1):24-30.
Arafat S. Cross cultural adaptation & psychometric validation of instruments: Step-wise description. Int J Psychiatry. 2016;1(1):1-4.
Petek D, Pušnik A, Selič P, Cedilnik Gorup E, Trontelj Ž, Riou M et al. Semantic and cultural equivalence of the Working Alliance Inventory Short-Revised scale for therapeutic alliance in family medicine: lessons learned in Slovenia. Zdr Varst. 2019.
Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Medico-Biotechnica
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.