Examining Determinants of Leadership Style among Montenegrin Managers

  • Anđelko Lojpur
  • Ana Aleksić
  • Sanja Vlahović
  • Mirjana Pejić Bach
  • Sanja Peković
Keywords: decision-making characteristics, demographic characteristics, internal organizational characteristics, leadership style, Montenegro

Abstract

As a leader’s behavior can have a strong impact on different employee work- related outcomes, various approaches have been put forth in an effort to determine the most effective form of leadership and determinants of individuals’ choice of leadership style. This paper analyzed whether one’s choice of leadership style is due more to personal or organizational characteristics. We used survey data to investigate the determinants of leadership style among Montenegrin managers. Our analysis showed that, although demographic characteristics such as gender, age, and education do not influence the choice of leadership style, internal organizational characteristics such as hierarchical level, managerial orientation to tasks/people, and decision-making characteristics such as decision- making style and decision-making environment are positively associated with the choice of democratic leadership style. This contributes to recent research in leadership that shows how some personal characteristics are considered to be less important in developing certain styles and that the choice of style is more dependent and contingent on external influences and situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Anđelko Lojpur

Faculty of Economics, University of Montenegro, Montenegro
E-mail: andjelko@ac.me

Anđelko Lojpur, Ph.D., is a full professor at the Faculty of Economics, University of Montenegro, and also a prorector of the University of Montenegro, Montenegro. He has published more than 80 scientific papers in the field of organization, organization development, privatization, and economic development. He is a member of several journal editorial boards and coordinates two Tempus projects. He also provides consulting services to several organizations in Montenegro.

Ana Aleksić

Faculty of Economics and Business Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Croatia
E-mail: aaleksic@efzg.hr

Ana Aleksić, Ph.D., is a senior teaching and research assistant at the Department of Organization and Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb. Her research interests include various aspects of organizational behavior, with a special emphasis on the role of organizational design practices in shaping behavior within different organizational levels. She is the author and co-author of several book chapters and journal publications and has participated as a consultant on several scientific and commercial projects.

Sanja Vlahović

Ministry of Science, Montenegro
E-mail: sanjavlahovic@t-com.me

Sanja Vlahović, Ph.D., currently works as the Minister of Science in Montenegro. She has built her career at academic institutions in Montenegro and abroad. She teaches strategic management, leadership and theory of management, entrepreneurial leadership, and a doctoral course in tourism business systems management. She has also been a visiting lecturer at universities in the Netherlands, Hungary, Poland, Italy, and the United States. Throughout her career, she has participated in several scientific research projects in Montenegro.

Mirjana Pejić Bach

Faculty of Economics and Business Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Croatia
E-mail: mpejic@efzg.hr

Mirjana Pejić Bach, Ph.D., is a full professor at the Department of Informatics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, Croatia. Her research interests include decision support systems, electronic commerce, and data mining. She has published more than 140 publications in scientific journals, conference proceedings, and books She has also participated in a number of EU FP7 projects and served as a consultant for several scientific and commercial projects.

Sanja Peković

Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France
E-mail: sanja.pekovic@dauphine.fr

Sanja Pekovic, Ph.D., is an associate professor in economics at the University of Montenegro, Montenegro and a researcher at the University of Paris–Dauphine, France. She has participated in several international scientific conferences and has published papers in recognized journals, with a special interest in industrial organization and relations, international management practices, and environmental economics.

References

Ali, H., & Ali, H. (2011). Demographics and spiritual leadership: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Business and Management Review, 1(10), 36–42.

Ansari, A. H., & Naeem, F. (2010). Different leadership styles across hierarchical levels: A case study on Indian automobile industry. Asia Pacific Business Review, VI(3), 115–123.

Barbuto Jr., J. E, Fritz, S. M., Matkin, G. S., & Marx, D. B. (2007). Effects of gender, education, and age upon leaders’ use of influence tactics and full range leadership behaviors. Sex Roles, 56(1/2), 71–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9152-6

Bartkus, E. V., Kaminskas, G., & Grunda, R. (2012). Importance of age and gender in the interface between a leader and followers. Transformations in Business & Economics. 11 (1), 184–198.

Bhatti, N., Maitlo, G. M., Shaikh, N., Hashmi, M. A., & Shaikh, F. M. (2012). The impact of autocratic and democratic leadership style on job satisfaction. International Business Research, 5(2), 192–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n2p192

Choi, S. (2007) Democratic leadership: The lessons of exemplary models for democratic governance. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(3), 243–262.

Collard, J. L. (2001). Leadership and gender: An Australian perspective. Educational Management and Administration, 29(3), 343–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263211X010293008

Druskat, V. (1994). Gender and leadership style: Transformational and transactional leadership in the Roman Catholic Church. Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), 99–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(94)90023-X

Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 807-834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004

Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233

Edwards, G., & Gill, R. (2012). Transformational leadership across hierarchical levels in UK manufacturing organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(1), 25–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437731211193106

Ekaterini, G. (2010). The impact of leadership styles on four variables of executives' workforce. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(6), 3–16.

Gastil, J. (1994). A definition and illustration of democratic leadership. Human Relations, 47(8), 953–975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700805

Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Gujrati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics. Boston: McGraw Hill

Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hassan, F. S. U., Shah, B., Zaman, T., Ikramullah, M., & Ali Shah, I. (2011). Effect of leaders’ styles of decision making on perceived organizational effectiveness: An example from Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(22), 297–307.

Hunt, J. G. (1971). Leadership-style effects at two managerial levels in a simulated organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(4), 476–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2391767

Iqbal, J., Inayat, S., Ijaz, M., & Zahid, A. (2012). Leadership styles: Identifying approaches and dimensions of leaders. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(3), 641–659.

Jonsen, K., Maznevski, M. L.,& Schneider, S. C.(2010). Gender differences in leadership—Believing is seeing: Implications for managing diversity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29(6), 549–572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02610151011067504

Kabacoff, R. I. (1999). Management level, job function and leadership style: A large sample study. Paper presented at the 107th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Boston, MA, USA.

Kabacoff, R. I. (2002). Leadership: What has age got to do with it? Research release. New York: Management Research Group.

Kabacoff, R. I., & Stoffey, R. W. (2001). Age differences in organisational leadership. Paper presented at 16th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology. San Diego, CA, USA.

Kao, H. (2006). The relationship between leadership style & demographic characteristics of Taiwanese executives. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 5(2), 35–48.

Kazan, A. L. (2000). Exploring the concept of self-leadership: Factors impacting self-leadership of Ohio AmeriCorps members. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 60(11-A), 3870.

Komives, S. R. (1991). Gender differences in the relationship of hall directors’ transformational and transactional leadership and achieving styles. Journal of College Student Development, 32(2), 155–165.

Manning, T. T. (2002). Gender, managerial level, transformational leadership and work satisfaction. Women In Management Review, 17(5), 207–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09649420210433166

Merchant, K. (2012). How men and women differ: Gender differences in communication styles, influence tactics, and leadership styles. CMC Senior Theses (Paper 513). Retreived from http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/513

Mullins, L. J. (2005). Management and organisational behaviour. Essex: Prentice Hall.

Nayak, B. (2011). Leadership style of managers and supervisors: A case study of Rourkela Steel Plant in India. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 42, 29–41.

Oshagbemi, T. (2008). The impact of personal and organisational variables on the leadership styles of managers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10), 1896–1910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190802324130

Oshagbemi, T., & Gill, R. (2004). Differences in leadership styles and behaviour across hierarchical levels in UK organizations. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(1), 93–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437730410512796

Payden, B. L. (1997). The relationship between perceived leadership behaviors and job satisfaction based on age, gender, and education level variables. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 57(7-A), 3127.

Posner, B. Z. (1992) Person–organization values congruence: No support for individual differences as a moderating influence. Human Relations, 45(4), 351–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500403

Puffer, S. M. (1990). Attributions of charismatic leadership: The impact of decision style, outcome, and observer characteristics. Leadership Quarterly, 1(3), 177–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90019-E

Rehman, R. R., & Waheed, A. (2012). Transformational leadership style as a predictor of decision making styles: Moderating role of emotional intelligence. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 6(2), 257–268.

Shadare, O. A. (2011). Management style and demographic factors as predictors of managerial efficiency in work organizations in Nigeria. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(7), 85–93.

Singh, P., Nadim, A., & Ezzedeen, S. R. (2012). Leadership styles and gender: An extension. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(4), 6–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jls.20239

Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, November, 1–9.

Tannenbauem, R., & Schmidt, W. H. (1973). How to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, 51(3), 162–180.

Taylor, T. R. (1998). Factors influencing the effectiveness of cross-functional work teams in a research and development organiza- tion. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 58 (10-B), 5685.

Thomas, B. B. (1996). The relationship of leadership style to teacher leadership preferences. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 57 (1-A), 0064.

Toren, N., Konrad, A. M., Yoshioka, I., & Kashlak, R. (1997). A cross-national cross-gender study of managerial task preferences and evaluation of work characteristics. Women in Management Review, 12(6), 234-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09649429710182459

van Engen, M. L., van der Leeden, R., & Willemsen, T. M. (2001). Gender, context, and leadership styles: A field study. Journal of Occu- pational and Organizational Psychology, 74(5), 581–598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317901167532

van Engen, M. L., & Willemsen, T. M. (2000). Gender and leadership styles: A review of the past decade. WORC Paper 00.10.09, 1–33. Retrieved from http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=4218.

Vinkenburg, C. J., van Engen, M. L., Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2011). An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women's promotion? The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 10–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.003

Vroom, V. H. (2000). Leadership and the decision-making process. Organizational Dynamics, 28(4), 82–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)00003-6

Yammarino, F. J., Dubinsky, A. J., Comer, L. B., & Jolson, M. A. (1997). Women and transformational and contingent reward leadership: A multiple-levels-of-analysis perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 205–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/257027

Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organisations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International.

Published
2015-08-01
How to Cite
Lojpur A., Aleksić A., Vlahović S., Pejić Bach M., & Peković S. (2015). Examining Determinants of Leadership Style among Montenegrin Managers. Naše gospodarstvo/Our Economy, 61(1), 13-24. Retrieved from https://journals.um.si/index.php/oe/article/view/2268