Tax Policy and Income Inequality in the Visegrad Countries
Abstract
The financialisation of economies is believed to be the primary cause of the increase in income inequality in the world, occurring on a scale unseen for more than 30 years. One can hypothesise that it is the state that is responsible for the widening inequality, as the state has not sufficiently used the redistributive function of taxation. The purpose of this paper is to study the impact of tax policy on income inequality in Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. These so-called Visegrad countries have, in the last several years, carried out some controversial experiments with tax policy, specifically in terms of the flattening of tax progressivity or its replacement with a flat tax, which led to the weakening of the income adjustment mechanism. The imbalance between income tax and consumption tax has contributed to perpetuating income inequality. The verification of tax systems carried out during the recent financial crisis has forced the countries included in this research to implement tax reforms. The introduced changes caused various fiscal and redistributive effects. Analyses show that the changes in income taxation and an increase in the consumption tax rate had the most negative impact on the income and asset situation in Hungary.
Downloads
References
Blaug, M. (1994), Teoria ekonomii. Ujęcie retrospektywne. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
CBO. (2011). Trends in the distribution of household income between 1979 and 2007. Washington: The Congress of the United States,Congressional Budget Office.
CSO. (2011). Central Statistical Office (Główny Urząd Statystyczny), Europejskie badanie dochodów i warunków życia (EU-SILC) w 2010r., Materiał na konferencję prasową w dniu 22 grudnia 2011 r., Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Departament Badań Społecznych i Warunków Życia.
Eurostat. (2014). Taxation trends in the European Union, Data for the EU member states, Iceland and Norway. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Eurostat. (2015). Eurostat database. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
Galbraith, J. K. (1999). Godne społeczeństwo. Program troski o ludzkość. Warsaw: PTE, Dom Wydawniczy Bellona.
Hein, E. (2010). Distribution,‘financialisation’ and the financial and economic crisis – implications for post-crisis economic policies. Berlin: Berlin School of Economics and Law and Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
Kitamura, Y., & Miyazaki, T. (2014). Redistributive effects of income tax rates (Discussion Paper Series A No.610). Institute of Economic Research Hitotsubashi University.
Moździerz, A. (2015). Fiscal consolidation in Hungary in the years 2010–2013. Krakow: Argumenta Oeconomica Cracoviensia.
OECD. (2008). OECD economic surveys, Japan: Author.
OECD. (2011). Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2012). Income inequality and growth: The role of taxes and transfers (No. 9). Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2015). OECD tax database. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org
Owsiak, S. (2005). Finanse publiczne. Teoria i praktyka (Wydanie III zmienione). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Riihelä, M., Sullström, R., & Suoniemi, I (2008). Tax progressivity and recent evolution of the Finnish income inequality. Helsinki: Government Institute for Economic Research.
Smith A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218
Thoresen, T. O. (2004). Reduced tax progressivity in Norway in the nineties. The effect from tax changes. International Tax and Public Finance, 11, 487–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:ITAX.0000033989.32569.5e
Verbist, G., & Figari, F. (2014). The redistributive effect and progressivity of taxes revisited: An international comparison across the European Union. (EUROMOD Working Paper No. EM 6).
Voinea, L., & Mihaescu, F. (2009). The impact of the flat tax reform on inequality — the case of Romania. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 4, 19–41.
