Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies: A Systemic Approach

  • Jelena Nikolić
  • Dejana Zlatanović
Keywords: corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, CG–CSR synergies, systemic approach, combined use of selected systems methodologies

Abstract

Respecting the importance of corporate governance (CG), particularly various corporate governance mechanisms for improving corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities, the paper highlights relevant CG–CSR synergies from the perspective of systems thinking. The paper further aims to demonstrate the ways in which selected systems methodologies can support CG–CSR synergies. Accordingly, we selected appropriate systems methodologies, such as dialectical systems theory, soft systems methodology, and system dynamics. We defined the dialectical system, consisting of essential corporate governance mechanisms, which contribute to CSR; we also identified the key stakeholders and their perceptions of CG–CSR relations through CATWOE analysis; thus, the appropriate root definition and conceptual model, including the activities that are relevant for CG–CSR relations, were developed. Developed systemic framework provided a relevant methodological support to highlight the various issues of corporate governance, such as institutional framework, market for corporate control, ownership structure, board structure, and their contribution to CSR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jelena Nikolić

University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Economics, Serbia
E-mail: jnikolic@kg.ac.rs

Jelena Nikolić is an assistant professor on the following subjects: introduction to management, decision making theory, and corporate governance at the Faculty of Economics, University of Kragujevac, Republic of Serbia. She received her PhD from the University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Economics. Her research focus is on strategic decision-making, corporate governance, and corporate entrepreneurship. She is author/co-author of numerous scientific papers and monographs chapters.

Dejana Zlatanović

University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Economics, Serbia
E-mail: dejanaz@kg.ac.rs

Dejana Zlatanović is an assistant professor, teaching the subjects of management science and economic cybernetics at the University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Economics, Republic of Serbia, where she received her PhD degree. Her research interest is focused on systems thinking and its application in business economics, i.e., systems methodologies for problem situations, structuring, innovation management, and corporate social responsibility. She is author/co-author of numerous scientific papers and monographs chapters.

References

Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0322

Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00495.x

Aguilera, R.V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 483–573. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1024503

Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079

Arora, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (2011). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating roles of attainment discrepancy and organization slack. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00843.x

Babić, V., & Nikolić, J. (2016). Key factors of corporate governance model development in transition economies. Theme, XL(2), 747-761.

Babić, V. (2010). Corporate governance in transition economies. Theme, 34(2), 555-568.

Babić, V., Nikolić, J., & Erić, J. (2011). Rethinking the performance of board roles: Toward an integrative model. Economic Annals, LVI(190), 140-162. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1190140B

Babić, V., Nikolić, J., & Erić, J. (2013). Board Structure and Corporate Performance: Traditional vs. Contemporary Approach. In V. Babić (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in Economics, Business and Management (pp. 49-61). Kragujevac: Ekonomski fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujevcu

Bichta, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility a role in government policy and regulation? Retrieved from http://www.bath.ac.uk/management/cri/pubpdf/Research_Reports/16_Bichta.pdf

Block, D., & Gerstner, A. M. (2016). One-tier vs. two-tier board structure: A comparison between United States and Germany. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=fisch_2016

Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: J. Wiley

Creсpi, R., & Renneboog, L. (2010). (Institutional) shareholder activism new? Evidence from UK shareholder coalitions in the pre-Cadbury era. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(4), 274-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00795.x

Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703

Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2012). Does ownership type matter for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00907.x

Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2013). Ownership concentration and CSR policy of European multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1574-1

Denis, D., & McConnell, J. (2003). International corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/4126762

Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.39985540

Devinney, T., Schwalbach, J., & Williams, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: Comparative perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12041

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-326. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037

Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz-Blanco, S. (2014). Women on boards: Do they affect sustainability reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1329

Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233-236. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893932

Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0772-6

Huang, C. J. (2010). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(5), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200001784

Huse, M. (2007). Boards, Governance and Value Creation: The Human side of corporate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611070

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834-864. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.26

ISO (2010). ISO 26000:2010 ISO. International Organization for Standardization, Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/iso/social_responsibility

Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12154

Jamali, D., Hallal, M., & Abdallah, H. (2010). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: evidence from the healthcare sector. Corporate Governance, 10(5), 590-602. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011085562

Jamali, D., Safieddine, A., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: Synergies and interrelation- ships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00702.x

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economic, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115

Lane, D. (2008). The emergence and use of diagramming in system dynamics: A critical account. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.826

Larcker, D., & Tayan, B. (2011). Corporate governance matters: A closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. New Yersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Lebe, S. S., & Mulej, M., guest-editors and authors, with coauthors (2014). Social responsibility and holism in tourism. Kybernetes, 43(3-4), 346-666.

Mallin, C. A., Michelon, G., & Raggi, D. (2013). Monitoring intensity and stakeholders’ orientation: How does governance affect social and environmental disclosure? Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1324-4

Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2008). Thinking of the organization as a system: The role of managerial perceptions in developing a corporate social responsibility strategic agenda. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25, 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.900

Monks, R., & Minow, N. (2002). Corporate Governance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

Morgan, S. (2009). The impact of corporate social responsibility on mergers and acquisition. Oregon: Oregon State University - University Honors College, Corvallis

Mulej, M. (1974). Dialektična teorija sistemov in ljudski reki (in Slovene: The Dialectical Systems Theory and Proverbs). Naše gospodarstvo, 21(3-4), 207-212.

Mulej, M. (2000). Dialektična in druge mehkosistemske teorije (In Slovene: The Dialectical and Other Soft-Systems Theories). Maribor: University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business

Mulej, M. & (by ABC order): S. Božičnik, V. Čančer, A. Hrast, T. Jere Lazanski, K. Jurše, Š. Kajzer, J. Knez-Riedl, T. Mlakar, N. Mulej, V. Potočan,

F. Risopoulos, B. Rosi, G. Steiner, T. Štrukelj, D. Uršič, Z. Ženko (2013a). Dialectical Systems Thinking and the Law of Requisite Holism Concerning Innovation. Litchfield Park, AZ: Emergent Publication

Mulej, M., Hrast, A., & Ženko, Z. guest-editors and authors, with coauthors (2013b). Social responsibility – measures and measurement. Systems Practice and Action Research, 26(6), 471-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-013-9297-5

Mulej, M., Hrast, A., & Dyck, R., guest-editors and authors, with coauthors (2015). Social responsibility – a new socio-economic order. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(2),147-264 https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2253

Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277797

Nikolić, J., & Babić, V. (2016). The implications of ownership concentration for shareholder protection and strategic decision-making. Economic Annals, LXI(211), 47-76. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1611069N

Rees, W., & Rodionova, T. (2015). The influence of family ownership on corporate social responsibility: An international analysis of publicly listed companies. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 23(3), 184-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12086

Sánchez, J. L. F., Sotorrío, L. L., & Díez, E. B. (2011). The relationship between corporate governance and corporate social behavior: a structural equation model analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(2), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.244

Savović, S. (2012). The importance of post-acquisition integration for value creation and success of mergers and acquisitions. Economic Horizons, 14(3), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonhor1203193S

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x

Sjöström, E. (2008). Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility: What do we know? Sustainable Development, 16(3), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.361

Stojanović-Aleksić, V., Erić-Nilesen, J., & Bošković, A. (2016). Social responsibility in the banking sector: Experience from Serbia. Bankarstvo, 45(2), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.5937/bankarstvo1602034S

Tricker, B. (2009). Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies and Practices. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00584.x

Yoshikawa, T., & Rasheed, A. (2009). Convergence of corporate governance: Critical review and future directions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00745.x

Ženko, Z., & Mulej, M. (2011). Diffusion of innovative behaviour with social responsibility. Kybernetes, 40(9/10), 1258-1272. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921111169378

Ženko, Z., Hrast, A., & Mulej, M. (2013). Social responsibility: Measures and measurement as a basis for organizational systemic action. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26, 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-013-9306-8

Zhang, J. Q., Zhu, H., & Ding, H. (2013). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1352-0

Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z., & Zhu, J. (2010). Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: Evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan earthquake. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0067-3

Zlatanović, D. (2012). System dynamics models in management problems solving. Economic Horizons, 14(1), 25-38.

Zlatanović, D. (2015). A holistic approach to corporate social responsibility as a prerequisite for sustainable development: empirical evidence. Economic Annals, LX(207), 69-94. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1507069Z

Zlatanović, D., & Mulej, M. (2015). Soft-systems approaches to knowledge-cum-values management as innovation drivers. Baltic Journal of Management, 10(4), 497-518. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2015-0015

Published
2018-07-22
How to Cite
Nikolić J., & Zlatanović D. (2018). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies: A Systemic Approach. Naše gospodarstvo/Our Economy, 64(3), 36-46. Retrieved from https://journals.um.si/index.php/oe/article/view/2178