Labour Supply and Inequality Effects of In-Work Benefits: Evidence from Serbia
Abstract
Low labour market participation, together with the high effective tax wedge at low wage levels, create a fertile ground for the introduction of the in-work benefits (IWB) in Serbia. Our paper provides an ex-ante evaluation of the two IWB schemes, directed at stimulating the labour supply and more equal income distribution. The methodological approach combines the tax-and-benefit microsimulation model with the discrete labour supply model. Our results show that both individual and family-based IWB schemes would considerably boost labour market participation, although family-based benefits would have disincentivizing effects for the secondary earners in couples. Most of the behavioural changes take place among the poorest individuals, with significant redistributive effects.
Downloads
References
Aaberge, R., Colombino, U., & Strøm, S. (1999). Labour supply in Italy: An empirical analysis of joint household decisions, with taxes and quantityconstraints.Journal ofApplied Econometrics,14,403-422.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199907/08)14:4<403::AID-JAE520>3.0.CO;2-4
Arandarenko, M., & Vukojević, V. (2008). Labor costs and labor taxes in the Western Balkans. In C. Bredenkamp, M. Gragnolati & V. Ramljak (Eds.), Enhancing efficiency and equity: Challenges and reform opportunities facing health and pension systems in the Western Balkans (pp. 119-160). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Arandarenko, M., Vladisavljević, M., & Žarković-Rakić, J. (2012). From inactivity to work: analysis of the public policies impact and factors affecting inactivity. In Cerović, et al. ed.: From Global Crisis to Economic Growth. Which Way to Take? VOLUME I, ECONOMICS. Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade.
Baldini, M., Bosi, P., & Toso, S. (2002). Targeting welfare in Italy: Old problems and perspectives on reform. Fiscal Studies, 23(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2002.tb00054.x
Bargain, O., Caliendo, M., Haan, P., & Orsini, K. (2015). ‘Making work pay’ in a rationed labour market. Journal of Population Economics, 23, 323-351.
Bargain, O., Orsini, K., & Peichl, A. (2013). Comparing labour supply elasticities in Europe and the United States: New results. Journal of Human Resources, 49(3), 723-838. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.49.3.723
Bell, K. (2005). Tackling poverty and making work pay: Can tax credits do better? Presentation given at Institute for Fiscal Studies, 15 September 2005. Retrieved from http://www.ifs.org.uk/docs/bell_taxcredits05.ppt#5
Blundell, R. W., & Macurdy, T. (1999). Labour supply: A review of alternative approaches. In O. Aschenfleter & D. Card (Eds). Handbook of labour economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 27, pages 1559-1695. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03008-4
Blundell, R. W., Duncan A., McCrae J., & Meghir, C. (2000). The labour market impact of the working families tax credit. Fiscal Studies, 21(1), 75-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00581.x
Blundell, R., & Hoynes, H. W. (2004). Has ‘in-work’ benefit reform helped the labor market? In Seeking a premier economy: The economic effects of British economic reforms, 1980-2000 (pp. 411-460). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226092904.003.0011
Blundell, R. (2006). Earned Income Tax Credit policies: Impact and optimality. Labour Economics, 13, 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2006.04.001
Brewer, M. (2006). Tax credits: fixed or beyond repair? In: Chote, R. et al. (Eds.), The IFS Green Budget. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Brewer, M., Duncan, A., Shephard, A., & Suarez, M. J. (2006). Did working families’ tax credit work? The impact of in-work support on labour supply in Great Britain. Labour Economics, 13, 699-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2005.11.002
Clavet, N.-J., Tiberti, L., Vladisavljević, M., Žarković-Rakić, J., Anić, A., Krstić, G., & Ranđelović, S. (2019). Reduction of child poverty in Serbia: Benefit or employment strategy? Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 27, 615– 645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12197
Colonna, F., & Marcassa, S. (2013). Taxation and labour force participation: The case of Italy. Bank of Italy Occasional Paper No. 191. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2303708
Davies, P. (2018) Which countries have the worst income inequality in Europe?. Euronews. Retrieved from: https://www.euronews.com/2018/04/26/which-countries-have-the-worst-income-inequality-in-europe-.
De Luca, G., Rossetti, C., & Vuri, D. (2013). In-work benefits for married couples: An ex-ante evaluation of EITC and WTC policies in Italy. IZA Journal of Labour Policy, 3:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9004-3-23
European Commission (2010). Europe 2020: A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf
Eissa, N., & Hoynes, H. (1998). The Earned Income Tax Credit and the labour supply of married couples. NBER Working paper No. 6856. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6856
Eissa, N., & Liebman J. B. (1996). Labour tax supply response to the Earned Income Tax Credit. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 605-637. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946689
Eurostat (2019a). Employment Statistics. Statistics Explained. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Employment_statistics
Eurostat (2019b). Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income-EU-SILC survey. Retrieved from: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ilc_di12 .
Figari, F. (2010). Can in-work benefits improve social inclusion in the Southern European countries? Journal of European Social Policy, 20(4), 301-315.
Figari, F. (2015). From housewives to independent earners: Can the tax system help Italian women to work? Journal of Social Policy, 44(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000555
Haan, P., & Myck, M. (2007). Apply with caution: Introducing UK-style in-work support in Germany. Fiscal Studies, 28, 43-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2007.00047.x
Hazans, M. (2011). Informal workers across Europe: Evidence from 30 countries. IZA Discussion Paper 5871. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5912
Heckman, J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurements, 5, 475-492.
Heckman, J. (1979). Sample specification bias as a selection error. Econometrica, 47, 153-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
Immervoll, H., & O’Donoghue, C. (2001). Welfare benefits and work incentives: An analysis of the distribution of net replacement rates in Europe using EUROMOD, a multi-country microsimulation model. EUROMOD working paper EM4/01.
Immervoll, H., & Pearson, M. (2009). A good time for making work pay? Taking stock of in-work benefits and related measures across the OECD. IZA Policy Paper No 3.
Immervoll, H. (2012). Activation policies in OECD countries – An overview of current approaches. OECD Social Protection and Policy Note. Koettl, J. (2010). Does formal work pay in Serbia? The role of labour taxes and social benefit design in providing disincentives for formal work. A technical note prepared for the World Bank. Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Kolm, A. S., & Tonin, M. (2011). In-work benefits and unemployment. International Tax and Public Finance, 18(1), 74-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-010-9148-6
Krstić, G., & Sanfey, P. (2011). Earnings inequality and informal economy: Evidence from Serbia. Economics of Transition, 19(1), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2010.00400.x
Krstić, G., Arandarenko, M., Arsić, M., Radulović, B., Ranđelović, S., & Janković, I. (2015). Formalising the shadow economy in Serbia: Main findings and recommendations. In G. Krstić & F. Schneider (Eds.), Formalising the shadow economy in Serbia (pp. 123-158). Springer Open, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13437-6_9
Leibfritz, W. (2008). Increasing employment in FYR Macedonia: The role of labour taxation. A Policy Note prepared for the World Bank. Leppik, L. (2006). In-work benefits: Literature review. Tallin: PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies.
Li, J., & O’Donoghue, C. (2013). A survey of dynamic microsimulation models: Uses, model structure and methodology. International Journal of Microsimulation, 6(2), 3-55.
Löfller, M., Peichl, A., & Siegloch, S. (2014). Structural labour supply models and wage exogeneity. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8281. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2464472
McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp.105-142). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Meghir, C., & Phillips, D. (2010). Labour supply and taxes. In J. Mirrlees (Ed.), The Mirrlees review. (pp. 202-274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meyer, B., &Rosenbaum, D. (2000). Making single mothers work: Recent tax and welfare policy and its effects. National Tax Journal, 53(4), 1027-1062. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2000.4S1.02
Mojsoska-Blazevski, N. (2012). Taxation of labour: The effect of labour taxes and costs on employment in Macedonia. Post-Communist Economies, 24(2), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2012.675158
Mojsoska-Blazevski N., Petreski, M., &Petreska, D. (2015). Increasing the labour market activity of the poor, females, and informal workers: Let’s make work pay in Macedonia. Eastern European Economics, 53(6), 466-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2015.1103656
Myck, M., Kurowska, A., & Kundera, M. (2013). Financial support for families with children and its trade-offs: Balancing redistribution and parental work incentives. Baltic Journal of Economics, 13(2), 61-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2013.10840533
OECD (2009). A good time for making work pay? Taking stock of in-work benefits and related measures across the OECD. OECD Working Papers No. 81.
OECD (2019). Labour force participation rate. Retrieved from: https://data.oecd.org/emp/labour-force-participation-rate.htm.
Orsini, K. (2006). Is Belgium making work pay? KU Leuven Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.934317
Orsini, K., & Bargain, O. (2006). In-work policies in Europe: Killing two birds with one stone? Labour Economics, 13(6), 667-693. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2005.10.007
Owens, J. (2006). Fundamental tax reform: An international perspective. National Tax Journal, 59(1), 131–64. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2006.1.06
Ranđelović, S., & Žarković-Rakić, J. (2013). Improving working incentives: Evaluation of tax policy reform using SRMOD. International Journal of Microsimulation, 6(1), 157-176.
Saget, C. (1999). The determinants of female labour supply in Hungary. Economics of Transition, 7(3), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0351.00026
St Martin, A., & Whiteford, P. (2003). More jobs and better pay. OECD Observer No. 239, September 2003. Retrieved from http://oecdob-server.org/news/archivestory.php/aid/1077/More_jobs_and_better_pay.html
Saez, E. (2002). Optimal income transfer programs: Intensive versus extensive labour supply responses. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,117. 1039–73. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302760193959
Scholtz, J. K. (1994). The Earned Income Tax Credit: Participation, compliance, and anti-poverty effectiveness. National Tax Journal, 47, 59–81.
Scholtz, J. K. (1996). In-work benefits in the United States: The Earned Income Tax Credit. Economic Journal, 106, 156–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234939
SORS (Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia) (2016). Labour Force Survey in the Republic of Serbia, 2015, Bulletin 608, Belgrade: SORS.
Sutherland, H., & Figari, F. (2013). EUROMOD: the European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model. International Journal of Micro-simulation, 6(1), 4-26.
Van Soest, A. (1995). Structural models of family labour supply: A discrete choice approach. Journal of Human Resources, 30, 63-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/146191
Žarković-Rakić, J., Ranđelović, S., & Vladisavljević, M. (2016). Labour market effects of Social Security contributions reform in Serbia. Economic Annals, 208, 73–92. https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1608073Z
