Regional Differences in the Conditions of Technological Progress in Europe
Abstract
The spatial structure of the world is unequal, centres and peripheries alternate. There are significant social and development differences between countries in the world, but there is also an unequal development within the countries. The main purpose of the regional policy is to reduce spatial inequalities by catching up the underdeveloped areas. Nowadays, in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, technological progress creates possibilities for developing regions to catch up, because new technologies require new skills that are less dependent on factor endowments of countries. Most economies are unable to create new technologies because they do not have the appropriate resources or their institutional environment does not favour innovation. However, technological progress can also be observed in these countries by adopting and applying new technologies effectively. This research aims to illustrate the regional differences in the conditions of technological progress in Europe, using multivariate statistical methods. Based on the European Regional Competitiveness Index, the research question to be analysed is whether new technologies may be able to decrease spatial differences. We compare the European regions in the field of innovation in order to highlight the critical areas that can promote or prevent the reduction of inequalities.
Downloads
References
Annoni, P., & Dijkstra, L. (2019). The EU Regional Competitiveness Index 2019. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/work/2019_03_rci2019.pdf
Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013): Regional Competitiveness and Territorial Capital: A Conceptual Approach and Empirical Evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies, 47(9), 1383-1402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.681640
Corinne Autant-Bernard, C., Fadairo, M., & Massard, N. (2013). Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence. Research Policy, 42(1), 196-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.009
Barro, R. J., & Sala–i–Martin, X. (1997). Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009746629269
Basu, S., & Weil, D. N. (1998). Appropriate Technology and Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1025 – 1054. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555829
Békés, G. (2015). Measuring regional competitiveness: A survey of approaches, measurement and data. Discussion Papers Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest.
Caselli, F., & Coleman, W. J. (2006). The World Technology Frontier. The American Economic Review, 96(3), 499 – 522. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.499
European Commission (2019). Regional Competitiveness Index. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/maps/regional_competitiveness/
Fagerberg, J. (1987). A Technology Gap Approach to Why Growth Rates Differ. Research Policy, 16, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(87)90025-4
Grossmann, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994). Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.23
Growiec, J. (2006). The World Technology Frontier: What Can We Learn from the US States? Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics, 74(6), 777 – 807. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00686.x
Krugman, P. (1979). A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income. The Journal of Political Economy, 87(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1086/260755
Lukovics, M. (2009). Measuring Regional Disparities on Competitiveness Basis. In Bajmócy, Z.– Lengyel, I. (eds): Regional Competitiveness, Innovation and Environment. JATEPress, Szeged, pp. 39 – 53.
Sleuwaegen. L., & Ramboer, S. (2019). Regional competitiveness and high growth firms in the EU: the creativity premium. Applied Economics, https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1686454
