STEM on Demand – Can Current State of Higher Education Infrastructure Meet Expectations?

  • Hatidza Jahic
  • Amila Pilav-Velic
Keywords: STEM, education, infrastructure, development

Abstract

One of the biggest challenges facing the education system in Bosnia and Herzegovina is bridging the gap between the current state of higher education and the demand for research, innovation and a robust STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) curriculum. Higher education instiutions (HEIs) face poor R&D infrastructure while companies struggle with limited resources and the lack of internal researchers, all of which affect their capabilities to utilize university knowledge and research that will lead to further collaborations and innovations in STEM.Universities are primarily seen as a source of future employees as well as as a source of knowledge and innovation. This study aims to provide an overview and systematic analysis of the current state of scientific and research infrastructure and human resources in public and private universities located in the Sarajevo Canton region. This is done by using primary data collected through semi-structured interviews and a self-reporting comprehensive questionnaire in order to identify areas where further reforms and investments are needed. An analysis of the secondary data sources, such as current strategic documents and the existing assessments of education, was conducted. Consequently, this study offers several practical implications, including policy recommendations in areas such as higher education, research infrastructure and academic excellence, cooperation with the private sector, and IT infrastructure improvements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Hatidza Jahic

University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Economics, Bosnia and Herzegovina
E-mail: hatidza.jahic@efsa.unsa.ba

Amila Pilav-Velic

University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Economics, Bosnia and Herzegovina
E-mail: amila.pilav-velic@efsa.unsa.ba

References

Belderbos, R., Carree, M. & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33(10), 1477-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003

BHAS (online). Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved from http://www.bhas.ba/index.php?lang=en

Buganza, T. & Verganti, R. (2009). Open innovation process to inbound knowledge: collaboration with universities in four leading firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 306-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060910974200

Butz, W. P., Bloom, G. A., Gross, M. E., Kelly, T. K., Kofner, A. & Rippen, H. E. (2006). Is there a shortage of scientists and engineers? Issue Paper: Science and Technology (Santa Monica, CA,The RAND Corporation).

Carlisle, D. & Weaver, C.G. (2018). STEM education centers: catalyzing the improvement of undergraduate STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 5(47), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0143-2

Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. & Walsh, J.P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273

Colombo, M.G. & Piva, E. (2020) Start-ups launched by recent STEM university graduates: The impact of university education on entre- preneurial entry. Research Policy, 49(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103993

Colombo, M.G., D‘Addda, D. & Piva, E. (2010). The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: an empirical analysis. Journal of Technological Transfer, 35(1), 113-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9111-9

Council (2009). Council conclusions of 12 May 2009 on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (‘ET 2020’). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52009XG0528(01)&from=EN

EU/CoE (2015). Priorities for the Development of Higher Education in Bosnia and Herzegovina for the period 2016-2026. Retrieved from http://mcp.gov.ba/attachments/bs_Migrirani_dokumenti/Sektori/Obrazovanje/Obrazovanje-strate%C5%A1ki/Prioriteti,b.pdf

EUA (2013). Internationalisation in European higher education: European policies, institutional strategies and EUA support. Retrieved from http://www.eua.be/Libraries/publications-homepage-list/EUA_International_Survey

European Commission (2006). Delivering on the modernsation agenda for universities: education, research and innovation. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/uri=CELEX:52006DC0208&from=EN

European Commission (2012). Rethinking Education:Investing in skills for better socio-economic outcomes. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52012DC0669&from=en

European Commission (2013). Education and Training in Europe2020. Responses from the EU Member States. Eurodyce Report. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4cd55a97-854d-4fff-8ebd-3fd3f38ca58a

European Union (2011). Supporting growth and jobs – An agenda for the modernisation of Europe’s higher education systems COM (2011) 567 final. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/education/library/policy/modernisation_en.pdf

FMON (2012). Strateški pravci razvoja visokog obrazovanja u Federaciji Bosne i Hercegovine od 2012. do 2022. godine „Sinergija i partnerstvo“. Retrieved from http://fmon.gov.ba/Upload/Dokumenti/9fef4cd0-f57a-4b51-aaa0-aaeadd4da691_Strate%C5%A1ki%20pravci%20razvoja%20visokog%20obrazovanja.pdf

Framework Law on Higher Education in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Official Gazette of BiH, 59/07, 59/09). Retrieved from http://cip.gov.ba/images/pdf/okvirni/Okvirni.eng.pdf

Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M

Hagedoorn, J., Link, A.N. & Vonortas, N.S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6

Harabi, N. (1998). Innovation through vertical relations between firms, suppliers and customers: a study of German firms. Industry and Innovation, 5(2), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719800000009

HEA (online). Agency for Development of Higher Education and Quality Assurance of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved from http://hea.gov.ba/akreditacija_vsu/Default.aspx

IBU (online). International Burch University. Retrieved from https://www.ibu.edu.ba/

IUS (online). International University Sarajevo. Retrieved from https://www.ius.edu.ba/

Laine, K., Leino, M. & Pulkkinen, P. (2015). Open Innovation Between Higher Education and Industry. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(3), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0259-2

Law on Higher Education of the Sarajevo Canton (Official Gazette of the Sarajevo Canton, 33/17). Retrieved from http://www.cip.gov.ba/images/pdf/zakoni/sarajevo/Zakon_o_visokom_obrazovanju_Kantona_Sarajevo_33-17.pdf

Lööf, H. & Broström, A. (2008). Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9001-3

Lööf, H., & Heshmati, A. (2002). Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: A firm-level innovation study. International Journal of Production Economics, 76(1), 61-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00147-5

Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109992

Mohnen, P. & C. Hoareau. (2003). What Type of Enterprise Forges Close with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from CIS 2. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1086

Murphy, P.K., Firetto, C.N. &Greene, J.A. (2017). Enriching students‘ scientific thinking through relational reasoning: Seeking evidence in texts, tasks, and talk. Educational Psychological Review, 29(1), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9387-x

Oliver, A.L. & Liebeskind, J.P. (1998). Three levels of networking for sourcing intellectual capital in biotechnology: implications for studying interorganisational networks. International Studies of Management and Organization, 27(4), 76–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1997.11656719

Pavitt, K. (1991). What makes basic research economically useful?. Research Policy, 20(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90074-Z

Prados, J. W. (1998). Engineering education in the United States: past, present and future. Retrieved from https://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE1998/ Icee/papers/255.pdf

Salter, A.J. & Martin, B.R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3

Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences (Boulder, CO, Westview Press).

Sithole, A., Chiyaka, T. E., McCarthy, P., Muping, M.D., Bucklein, K.B & Kibirige, J. (2017). Student Attraction, Persistance and Retention in STEM Programs: Successes and Continuing Challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n1p46

SSST (online). Sarajevo School of Science and Technology. Retrieved from https://ssst.edu.ba/UNSA (online). University of Sarajevo. Retrieved from www.unsa.ba

Vicente, N.P., Lucas, M., Carlos, V. & Bem-Haja, P. (2020). Higher education in a material world: Constraints to digital innovation in Portuguese universities and polytechnic institues. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10258-5

Vlada RS (2016). Prijedlog Strategije razvoja obrazovanja Republike Srpske za period 2016. – 2021. godine. Retrieved from http://www.atvbl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Prijedlog-strategije-razvoja-obrazovanja-RS-2016-2021-1.pdf

Wienstein, M., Blades, D. & Gleason, S.C. (2016) Questioning power: Deframing the STEM discourse. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166294

Yanez, A.G., Thumlert, K., Castell de S. and Jenson,, J. (2019). Pathways to sustainable futures: A “production pedagagogy” model for STEM education. Futures, 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.02.021

Zeidler, D.L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z

Published
2022-07-15
How to Cite
Jahic H., & Pilav-Velic A. (2022). STEM on Demand – Can Current State of Higher Education Infrastructure Meet Expectations?. Naše gospodarstvo/Our Economy, 66(3), 48-55. Retrieved from https://journals.um.si/index.php/oe/article/view/2126