Engaging Economics and Traffic Engineering Students in Community Issues Using the MultiCreation Approach
Abstract
Effective teaching methods for the coming generations of pragmatic students and teachers are evolving towards much greater involvement on all sides, attempting to bridge real life and academia in innova-tive ways. Our theoretical foundation lays upon the Triple Helix, n-Tuple Helix theory and the innova-tion triangle, but in a problem-based multidisciplinary setting. After introducing and validating the Mul-tiCreation approach in teaching/learning for the business-academia collaboration, where multiple disci-plines, diverse profiles of students, professors, and managers have taken up various roles to address relevant business issues, we were encouraged to expand its applicability beyond the business world - toward societal problems. We retained the problem-based and participatory learning but shifted the positioning of the problem towards the safety of primary school children, incorporating economic, pro-ject-based, managerial, traffic engineering, logistical, regulatory, and governance issues. By including two primary schools, collaborating with their principals, advisory teams, and teachers, as well as chil-dren and parents, in two different cities, we aimed to provide complete research, engineering and educa-tion for the stakeholders so that the schools could just hand in documentation to the relevant municipal bodies to be acted upon effectuation. The involved students came from two faculties - of economics and traffic engineering, steered by three university professors on the subjects of project management and basic and advanced techniques for traffic management. The blended learning components took place as prescribed in the MultiCreation approach, during two semesters of two academic years. They combined countermeasures and solutions. The MultiCreation approach has been enhanced regarding its components and workflow and its effectiveness has been validated in a multi-stakeholder environ-ment of direct and indirect educational beneficiaries.
Downloads
References
Ataizi, M. (2012). ‘Communities of practice’, in Seel, N. M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, Springer US, Boston, MA.
Booth, S. E., (2012). Cultivating knowledge sharing and trust in online communities for educators. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47(1), 1-31.
Caro-Gonzalez, A. (2019). The “6I Research Model”: Evolution of an Innovative Institutional STI Policy Framework at the University of Deusto. Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 48, 104-112. DOI: 10.22163/fteval.2019.376.
Caro-Gonzalez, A., & Serra, A. (Coords.) et al. (2020). Towards social innovation ecosystems: From linear pairwise forms of interaction to common-purpose-driven networks for shared prosperity. Position Paper, Bilbao.
Caro-Gonzalez, A., & Ferreira-Lopes, L (2020). Universities in transition: The 6i Model for strategic governance and management. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 13(1). DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.1.67.13
CEDEFOP. (2019). Overview of national qualifications framework developments in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/8609_en.pdf
David Merrill, M., Drake, L., Lacy, J . M., Pratt, J., & the ID2 Research Group. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5-7.
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: university–industry–government innovation in action. London: Routledge.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix—university–industry–government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14, 14–19.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: a “Triple Helix” of university–industry–government relations, introduction to a theme issue. Minerva, 36, 203–208.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Res Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Evans, L. (2004). Traffic Safety. Bloomfield Hills, MI, Science Serving Society, pp. 412-425.
Fromkin, H., Geller, R. J., & Rubin, L., (2006). Safe and Healthy School Environment. Oxford University Press.
Farnell, T. (2020). ‘Community engagement in higher education: trends, practices and policies’, NESET report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2766/071482.
JRC (2021). The Communities of Practice Playbook - A playbook to collectively run and develop communities of practice.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1996). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, learning in doing. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Li, L. (2005). The Effects of Trust and Shared Vision on Inward Knowledge Transfer in Subsidiaries' Intra- and Inter- Organizational Relationships. International Business Review, 14(1), 77-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.12.005
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, ..., and an N-tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-based Economy? Journal of Knowledge Economy, 3, 25–35. DOI 10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4
O’Shea, G., Farny, S., & Hakala, H. (2021). The buzz before business: a design science study of a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Bussiness Economics, 56, 1097–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00256-4
Petrevska Nechkoska, R., & Mojsovska Salamovska, S. (2017). Context-appropriate implementation of blended learning in higher education in Western Balkans. In I. Vrdoljak Raguz (Ed.), DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting (Vol. 3, pp. 506–518). Presented at the DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, Dubrovnik. Croatia: University of Dubrovnik.
Petrevska Nechkoska, R. (2019). Tactical management in complexity: managerial and informational aspects. Heidelberg: Springer. Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030228033
Petrevska Nechkoska, R., Angeloska Dichovska, M. (2020). MultiCreation – participatory learning approach for business – academia collaboration. Teaching Methods for Economics and Business Sciences. Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference. Maribor: University of Maribor Press, Slovenia. DOI https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-356-2.4
Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428–461. Sagepub.com, DOI: 10.1177/1059601114560063Sein,
M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37-56.
Tubbs, N. (2014). The new teacher: An introduction to teaching in comprehensive education. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis.
Wagner, E. (2011). Essay: In search of the secret handshakes of ID. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 1(1), 33–38.
