Neoendogenous In- and Output of Selected Rural Areas: the Case of Economic Cycles in Slovenia

Keywords: rural areas, neoendogenous rural development, development potentials, economic cycles, Slovenia

Abstract

The article focuses on neoendogenous rural development that enables development of endogenous potentials of rural areas (human, social, economic, environmental etc. as development resources of the local territorial level) and external resources (i.e. RD programmes on national and EU level). Four Slovenian case study areas were chosen to test the existence, functioning and outcomes of economic cycles. The survey was undertaken on the smallest spatial-social unit (household), additionally existing voluntary local network (associations) and locally and widely connected economic structures (entrepreneurship) were observed. The research partly confirmed that the activation of endogenous potentials of rural areas is evident through the empowerment of (regional) economic cycles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Irma Potočnik Slavič, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Department of Geography; Ljubljana, Slovenia.

E-mail: irma.potocnik@ff.uni-lj.si

References

Ažman Momirski, L. et al. 2008: Terasirana pokrajina Goriških brd. Geografija Slovenije 17. Ljubljana, Geografski inštitut Antona Melika ZRC SAZU, 197 p. https://doi.org/10.3986/9789612545383

Bätzing, W., Ermann, U., Scheu, K. 1999: Regionale Absatzwege land- und forst-wirtschaftlicher Erzeugnisse aus dem Landkreis Neumarkt i. d. Opf. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Institut für Geographie, 38 p.

Foissner, P. 2000: Endogene Entwicklung in peripheren Regionen: Möglichkeiten der Aktivierung endogener Potenziale in der Region Vorpommern. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, Heft 4, p. 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03183795

Hacker, P. 2000: Regional economic cycles as an instrument of a sustainable endogenous economic policy – on the example of the food trade in the planning region Upper Franconia. Diploma work, Department of Economic Geography and Regional Planning, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, 30 p.

Herbert-Cheshire, L. 2000: Contemporary strategies for rural community develop-ment in Australia: a government perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, p. 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00054-6

Medmrežje: Vračanje gozdov ljubljanski nadškofiji, 2008.

http://24ur.com/novice/slovenija (19. 5. 2008).

Klemenčič, M. M. 2003: Civilizacijske razvojne stopnje in razvojni problemi obrobnih območij v Sloveniji. Dela 19, p. 153-164. https://doi.org/10.4312/dela.19.153-164

Klemenčič, M. M. 2006: Teoretski pogled na razvojne strukture slovenskega pode-želja. Slovenska politična geografija in podeželje na razpotju. Dela 25, p. 159-171. https://doi.org/10.4312/dela.25.159-171

Klemenčič, V. 1959: Pokrajina med Snežnikom in Slavnikom. Gospodarska geogra-fija. SAZU, Ljubljana, 197 p.

Lampič, B., Potočnik Slavič, I. 2006: Izbrane razvojne možnosti podeželja Zgornje Savinjske doline. V: Šalej, M. (ed.). Šaleška in Zgornja Savinjska dolina. Velenje: Erico, Inštitut za ekološke raziskave, p. 148-163.

Maier, J. 2002: Regional Economic Cycles as an Instrument of a Sustainable Regional Development in Rural Areas. Dela 17, p. 72-84. https://doi.org/10.4312/dela.17.72-84

Moseley, M. J. (edt.) 2003a: Local Partnerships for Rural Development. The European Experience. CABI Publishing, 210 p.

Mühlinghaus, S. 2002: Eigenständige Regionalentwicklung als Strategie für periphere ländliche Räume.Geographica Helvetica, Heft 2, 57. Jhg., p. 127-134.

Ploeg van der, J. D., Marsden, T. (edt.) 2008: Unfolding Webs: The Dynamics of Regional Rural Development. Van Gorcum, 262 p.

Potočnik Slavič, I. 2008: Endogeni razvojni potenciali podeželja. Doktorska diser-tacija, Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, 361 p.

Program razvoja podeželja 2007-2013, 2007. Ministrstvo za kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo in prehrano, 206 p.

Ray, C. 2006: Neo-endogenous Rural Development in the EU. In: Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage Publications, p. 278-291.

Rural Development in the EU, 2007: Statistical and Economic Information. Report 2007. EU, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, 358 p.

Slee, B. 1994: Theoretical aspects of the study of the endogenous development. V: van der Ploeg, J.D. in Long, A. (eds.). Born from within: Practice and perspec-tives of endogenous rural development. Assen, p. 184-194.

Svendsen, G. L. H., Sǿrensen, J. F. L. 2007: There´s more to the picture than meets the eye: Measuring tangible and intangible capital in two marginal communities in rural Denmark. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, p. 453-471.

Urry, J. 2003: Global complexity. Cambridge, 184 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33596-4_6

Volčini, K. et al. 2002: Razvojni problemi in možnosti občine Žužemberk. Dela 17, p. 238-249.

Vrišer, I. 1954: Goriška brda: gospodarska geografija. Geografski zbornik 2, p. 51-113.

Woods, M. 2005: Rural Geography. Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring. Sage Publications, 330 p.

Cajner, M. 2008: Gozdarstvo v Zgornji Savinjski dolini. Gozdno gospodarstvo Nazarje, Nazarje (30. 5. 2008, oral source).

Kostevc, V. 2008: Delovanje društev v občini Žužemberk, Občina Žužemberk (5. 3. 2008, oral source).

Markočič, A. 2008: Razvojne priložnosti občine Brda, občina Brda (16. 5. 2008, oral source).

Ribolica, D. 2008: Delovanje Vinske kleti Goriška Brda (11. 6. 2008, oral source).

Published
2010-06-15
How to Cite
Potočnik Slavič I. (2010). Neoendogenous In- and Output of Selected Rural Areas: the Case of Economic Cycles in Slovenia. Journal for Geography, 5(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.18690/rg.5.1.4006
Section
Scientific Articles