Kritično mišljenje pri osnovnošolski matematiki: čuječ, osmislitven in rados-ten model učenja

Avtorji

  • Pariang Sonang Siregar Universitas Rokania
  • Neni Hermita Riau University image/svg+xml
  • Firman Santosa Universitas Rokania
  • Tety Herti Universitas Rokania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18690/

Ključne besede:

poglobljeno učenje, proceduralno znanje, konceptualno znanje, kritično mišljenje, po-učevanje matematike, osnovna šola.

Povzetek

Študija ocenjuje model poglobljenega učenja, ki vključuje čuječe, osmislitveno in ra-dostno učenje za premostitev vrzeli med proceduralnim in konceptualnim znanjem. Z uporabo mešanih metod v okviru študija lekcij je sodelovalo 7 učiteljev in 20 in-donezijskih četrtošolcev. Kvantitativni rezultati so pokazali značilno izboljšanje kritičnega mišljenja (F = 528,603, p < 0,000) z izjemno velikim učinkom (d = 7,36). Kvalitativne ugotovitve razkrivajo, da je model vzpostavil psihološko varno okolje, ki spodbuja samostojno konstrukcijo znanja. Kljub majhnemu vzorcu študija ponuja potrjen pedagoški okvir za spodbujanje matematičnega sklepanja višjega reda prek afektivne varnosti in metakognicije.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Biografije avtorja

  • Pariang Sonang Siregar, Universitas Rokania

    Associate Professor in the Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Universitas Rokania, Indonesia. His research interests include primary school mathematics education, enjoyable learning in primary schools, and differentiated mathematics education in primary schools.

  • Neni Hermita, Riau University

    Professor in the Department of Elementary Education, aculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Riau, Indonesia. Her research interests include science education, curriculum innovation, instructional media, and integrating local culture into elementary learning. She is also the holder of a national patent in educational technology, reflecting her dedication to developing innovative learning tools.

  • Firman Santosa, Universitas Rokania

    Lecturer in the Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Rokania, Indonesia. He holds a master's degree in information technology from the Universitas Putera Indonesia YPTK Padang. His research interests include data science, digital transformation, the Internet of Things, and data mining.

  • Tety Herti, Universitas Rokania

    Student in the Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Universitas Rokania. She has an interest in the world of children, particularly in the context of primary school education. Tety is an outstanding student who is involved in this research. 

Literatura

Ang, C., Embi, M., and Md Yunus, M. (2016). Enhancing the quality of the findings of a longitudinal case study: Reviewing trustworthiness via ATLAS.ti. The Qualitative Report, 21(10), 1855–1867. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2480

Beattie, S. (2024). Play. In Challenge Based Learning: Engaging with Students Through Interactivity (pp. 135-175). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0198-1_4

Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chen, S. Y., Chen, W. C., and Lai, C. F. (2025). Generative AI as a reflective scaffold in a UAV-based STEM project: A mixed-methods study on students’ higher-order thinking and cognitive transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 30(17), 24787–24814. https://doi.org–/10.1007/s10639-025-13758-4

Clanton Harpine, E. (2024). Creating an intrinsically motivating learning environment: Promoting stu-dent engagement and intrinsic motivation. In Service Learning in Higher Education: From pedagogy to practice (pp. 59–76). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51378-7_5

Cole, R. (2024). Inter-rater reliability methods in qualitative case study research. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(4), 1944–1975. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241231156971

Creswell, J. W., and Creswell, J. D. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods ap-proach (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Levin, M. (2018). Conceptual and procedural knowledge during strategy construction: A complex knowledge systems perspective. Cognition and Instruction, 36(3), 247–278. https://doi.o–rg/10.1080/07370008.2018.1464003

Li, C., and Wen, F. (2023). Promoting deep learning in mathematics education —based on understand-ing by design theory. Academic Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 4(4), 57–61. https://doi.org/1–0.25236/AJMS.2023.040409

McEachen, J., Fullan, M., and Quinn, J. (2018). NPDL Global Report. New Pedagogies for Deep Learning: A global partnership. Deep Learning Series, 5. https://deep-learning.global/wp-content/up-loads/2016/12/npdl-global-report-2016.pdf

Murtadlo, M., Albana, H., Helmy, M. I., Libriyanti, Y., Izazy, N. Q., and Saloom, G. (2024). Preserving the gotong royong character for Indonesian Gen-Z in the digital era. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(3), 1631–1640. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijer–e.v13i3.27175

Mystakidis, S., Berki, E., and Valtanen, J. (2019). The patras blended strategy model for deep and mean-ingful learning in quality life-long distance education. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 17(2), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.17.2.01

Nguyen, P. N. T., Tran, K.-T., and Buu Le, G. (2025). Enhancing learning performance in primary education: The roles of problem solving and creative thinking challenges. Journal of Elementary Education, 18(3), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.4930

Polatbekova, K., Yergubekova, Z., Bostanova, A., Shektibayev, N., and Abdigapbarova, U. (2025). De-velopment of the scientific and innovative potential of future teachers. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 38665. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22379-3

Richards, J. B., Hayes, M. M., and Schwartzstein, R. M. (2020). Teaching clinical reasoning and critical thinking: from cognitive theory to practical application. Chest, 158(4), 1617–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.525

Rittle-Johnson, B., and Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175. https://doi.org/–10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.175

Sablić, M., Mirosavljević, A., and Marinac, A. M. (2025). Students’ perceptions of peer feedback in lower elementary school grades. Journal of Elementary Education, 18(2). https://doi.org/1–0.18690/rei.3773

Sarwanto, S., Fajari, L. E. W., and Chumdari, C. (2021). Critical thinking skills and their impacts on elementary school students. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.6

Shapiro, S. S., and Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591

Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., and Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. Amer-ican Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283120–33002455

Thinwiangthong, S., Chatathicoon, S., Ya-amphan, D., and Somumchan, V. (2021). Early childhood students’ mathematical ability in highscope and lesson study context. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 42(3), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.3.15

Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry. University of Chicago. http://ucsmp.uchicago.edu/resources/van_hiele_levels.pdf

Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics educa-tion: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathe-matics, 54 (1), 9-35. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005212.03219.dc

Vila-Henninger, L. A. (2019). Turning talk into “rationales”: Using the extended case method for the coding and analysis of semi-structured interview data in ATLAS.ti. Bulletin of Sociological Meth-odology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 143(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/07–59106319852887

Wang, Q., and Abdullah, A. H. (2024). Enhancing students’ critical thinking through mathematics in higher education: A systemic review. SAGE Open, 14(3), 21582440241275651. https://do–i.org/10.1177/21582440241275651

Willis, J. (2007). Cooperative learning is a brain turn-on. Middle School Journal, 38(4), 4–13. https://doi.o–rg/10.1080/00940771.2007.11461587

Prenosi

Objavljeno

30.06.2026

Izjava o dostopnosti podatkov

Članek temelji na podatkih, ki so v celoti predstavljeni in analizirani v besedilu članka, zato dodatna hramba oziroma arhiviranje podatkov ni potrebno.

Številka

Letn. 19 Št. 2 (2026): Revija za elementarno izobraževanje

Rubrika

Znanstveni članki

Licenca

Avtorske pravice (c) 2026 Pariang Sonang Siregar, Neni Hermita, Firman Santosa, Tety Herti

Creative Commons licenca

To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.

Kako citirati

Siregar, P. S., Hermita, N., Santosa, F., & Herti, T. (2026). Kritično mišljenje pri osnovnošolski matematiki: čuječ, osmislitven in rados-ten model učenja. Revija za elementarno izobraževanje, 19(2), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.18690/