Diagnostic relevance of free light chain indices and their relation to the clinical presentation of multiple sclerosis

Vloga indeksov prostih lahkih verig pri diagnozi multiple skleroze in njihova povezava s kliničnimi znaki

Authors

  • Sanja Karakatič University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine Author
  • Jožef Magdič University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Neurology; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology Author
  • Sašo Karakatič University of Maribor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Institute of Informatics Author
  • Tomaž Omerzu University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Neurology Author
  • Evgenija Modrič University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Laboratory diagnostics Author
  • Tanja Hojs Fabjan University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Neurology; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.192

Keywords:

Multiple sclerosis, free light chains, kappa index, lambda index, functional systems, EDSS score

Abstract

Purpose: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) free light chains (FLC) are of promising diagnostic importance in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, research is required to confirm their utility as part of the diagnostic criteria for MS. In addition, very few publications can be found addressing the relationship of FLCs to the clinical presentation at the onset of MS. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the FLC kappa and lambda indices, and explored their relationship to the number and type of functional systems (FS) involved.

Methods: FLC indices were determined in paired CSF and serum samples from 71 patients with noninflammatory neurological diseases (non-MS, n = 29) and new-onset MS (MS, n = 42). The latter were further divided into two groups with mono- and polysymptomatic presentation. FS involvement was evaluated in accordance with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).

Results: Using both FLC indices along with the age and sex of patients, the diagnostic accuracy of MS was higher (AUC, 0.991; sensitivity, 95.5%; specificity, 95.8%) than that observed when using either the lambda index (AUC, 0.677; sensitivity, 68.0%; specificity, 60.0%) or kappa index (AUC, 0.957; sensitivity, 88.5%; specificity, 88.0%) alone. No differences were observed in the lambda (U = 78.0; p = 0.749) or kappa indices (U = 82.0; p = 0.885) between mono- and polysymptomatic patients. Nor was a correlation found between FLC indices and EDSS scores.

Conslusion: FLC indices could be useful diagnostic markers for MS. However, such indices do not differentiate between clinical presentations at disease onset and are not correlated with baseline EDSS scores.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Sanja Karakatič, University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine

    Maribor, Slovenia. E-mail: karakatic.sanja@gmail.com

  • Jožef Magdič, University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Neurology; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology

    Maribor, Slovenia.

  • Sašo Karakatič, University of Maribor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Institute of Informatics

    Maribor, Slovenia.

  • Tomaž Omerzu, University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Neurology

    Maribor, Slovenia.

  • Evgenija Modrič, University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Laboratory diagnostics

    Maribor, Slovenia.

  • Tanja Hojs Fabjan, University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Neurology; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology

    Maribor, Slovenia.

Downloads

Published

29.11.2021

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Karakatič, S., Magdič, J., Karakatič, S., Omerzu, T., Modrič, E., & Hojs Fabjan, T. (2021). Diagnostic relevance of free light chain indices and their relation to the clinical presentation of multiple sclerosis: Vloga indeksov prostih lahkih verig pri diagnozi multiple skleroze in njihova povezava s kliničnimi znaki. Acta Medico-Biotechnica, 13(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.192