Usefulness of follicular fluid estradiol and progesterone concentration measurement in predicting outcome of IVF/ICSI natural cycles.

Uporabnost merjenja koncentracije estradiola in progesterona v folikularni tekočini pri napovedovanju izida IVF/ICSI postopka v naravnem ciklusu

  • Vida Gavrić Lovrec University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of reproductive medicine and gynecological endocrinology ; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ginecology and Obstetrics
  • Veljko Vlaisavljević University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of reproductive medicine and gynecological endocrinology
  • Borut Kovačič University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of reproductive medicine and gynecological endocrinology ; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ginecology and Obstetrics
  • Maksimiljan Gorenjak University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of laboratory diagnostics ; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ginecology and Obstetrics
  • Milan Reljič University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of reproductive medicine and gynecological endocrinology ; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ginecology and Obstetrics
Keywords: follicular fluid, natural cycle, estradiol, progesterone, IVF/ICSI, outcome

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to establish whether follicular fluid (FF) estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) measurement could be used to predict the outcome of unstimulated IVF/ICSI cycles.

Methods: 91 women underwent 150 unstimulated IVF/ICSI cycles (78 IVF and 72 ICSI). Follicular fluid samples were collected at the time of oocyte recovery. Using the ttest, FF E2 and FF P levels and their ratios (FF P/FF E2) were compared between cycles with successful (with oocyte) and unsuccessful (without oocyte) oocyte recovery, between cycles with and without fertilization and between nonconception and conception cycles.

Results: The oocyte recovery rate was 86.7% (123/150), the fertilization rate 68.3% (84/123) and the pregnancy rate per oocyte recovery 14.0% (21/150). The average FF E2 level was 3530 ± 1339 nmol/L, average FF P 20649 ± 9489 nmol/L and average FF P/FF E2 ratio 7.18 ± 6.42. There were no statistically significant differences in FF E2, FF P levels and their ratio between cycles with unsuccessful and successful oocyte recovery, between cycles without and with fertilization, and between nonconception and conception cycles.

Conclusion: From the FF E2 and P levels and their ratio, it is not possible to make inferences to the likelihood of oocyte recovery, fertilization and conception in unstimulated IVF/ICSI cycles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vida Gavrić Lovrec, University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of reproductive medicine and gynecological endocrinology ; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ginecology and Obstetrics

Ph. D., Maribor, Slovenia. E-mail: vida.gavric@ukc-mb.si

Veljko Vlaisavljević, University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of reproductive medicine and gynecological endocrinology

Maribor, Slovenia.

Borut Kovačič, University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of reproductive medicine and gynecological endocrinology ; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ginecology and Obstetrics

Maribor, Slovenia.

Maksimiljan Gorenjak, University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of laboratory diagnostics ; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ginecology and Obstetrics

Maribor, Slovenia.

Milan Reljič, University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of reproductive medicine and gynecological endocrinology ; University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ginecology and Obstetrics

Maribor, Slovenia.

Published
2021-11-27
How to Cite
Gavrić Lovrec V., Vlaisavljević V., Kovačič B., Gorenjak M., & Reljič M. (2021). Usefulness of follicular fluid estradiol and progesterone concentration measurement in predicting outcome of IVF/ICSI natural cycles . Acta Medico-Biotechnica, 5(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.65
Section
Articles